Feedback about MS-102 retirement

Just adding my thoughts here because I’m completely on the same page.

I honestly don’t get the logic behind retiring an expert‑level exam like MS‑102 and replacing it with an associate‑level one. Microsoft 365 is massive, and MS‑102 has been one of the few certifications that actually reflects the depth of what we do day‑to‑day. Losing it feels like we’re removing a key part of the certification path. I am the guy that did both your 100/101 and the beta of 102 and to have this AI chucked at us after removing SPO and EXO exams.

AB‑650 might cover some of the MS‑102 content, sure, but it also brings in a lot of AI‑heavy material that doesn’t replace the core admin and engineering skills the expert exam validated and we actually use daya to day. With MS‑900 already gone, and the Exchange and SharePoint exams retired years ago (which im still peeeeeeeeed about), we’re left without any proper certification that covers those workloads — even though they’re still critical in real environments. Want proof, check how many 3rd party content sites the MCTs are using for SPO and EXO, check and your see.

It really feels like the Microsoft 365 exams aren’t being treated with the seriousness they deserve. We need solid, role‑based exams that actually map to the responsibilities we have, not more AI‑focused content replacing foundational and expert‑level material. And we also need actual content deigners and writer and not AI slop or 3rd parties who put slop together, much like the refreshed md-102.

Could you or someone from the team please give some clear communication around the retirement of MS‑102 on the actual pages, why the change at a fundamental/curriculum planning structure and what the roadmap looks like for Microsoft 365 certifications going forward? A lot of us rely on these exams for professional development, for training work (IE contract work) and planning, so knowing the direction at this point will forge my participation going forward