Forum Discussion
Customizing the "modern" experiences in SharePoint Online - your opinion?
Microsoftthx Oliver Zeiser for starting this thread. We are absolutely interested on input around this. Would like to also point out that whatever is currently supported from customization perspective, is just a start and more capabilities will be supported gradually when those are finalized and ready to get published.
We would though absolutely be interested on hearing what are the key missing capabilities currently and other input around the questions what Oliver pointed out.
Your input truly matters, so thx for everyone's feedback and comments advance.
Vesa wrote:
► thx @Oliver Zeiser for starting this thread. We are absolutely interested on input around this. Would like to also point out that whatever is currently supported from customization perspective, is just a start and more capabilities will be supported gradually when those are finalized and ready to get published.
We would though absolutely be interested on hearing what are the key missing capabilities currently and other input around the questions what Oliver pointed out.
Your input truly matters, so thx for everyone's feedback and comments advance.
C'mon Vesa, you are turning into a shepherd who's sole Microsoft job it is to keep the flock at ease.
Your response is straight from the Community Manager 101 Textbook, chapter "How to silence threads"
You very well know what everyone wants to customize, you have been in this game for years.
You also know about Oliviers UserVoice post, so this reply here is kinda stupid to all those who are watching these threads.
https://sharepoint.uservoice.com/forums/329214-sites-and-collaboration/suggestions/13385364-allow-javascript-customization-and-css-branding-th
- VesaJuvonen
Thx Danny for the feedback. Let's be clear on few things.
- We are absolutely aware of the generic scenarios what we need to support
- We are working on enabling these in the modern experiences, like mentioned in the MSDN documentation and in Ignite presentations - we simply do not have infinite resources, so things happen gradually and input always helps on prioritizing which scenarios will be implemented first, since we no longer wait two-three years on showing new capabilities - and I think this is great
- I do not see any harm on asking scenario input from the community - maybe someone has missed the previous UserVoice entry or the discussion, so getting more input on the functional scenarios can't cause harm
- We absolutely understand that frustration around missing capabilities and team is working hard to address these gradually as fast as we can
We absolutely take community input into account around the new experiences, since we want to ensure that existing customers and partners benefit from the new capabilities. We do however release capabilities now gradually, which no doubt causes challenges to follow up on what's exactly supported and when you can enable your required scenarios.
I'd encourige people to evaluate modern experiences and take them into use, when needed capabilities and customization options are available. Each deployment has slightly different requirements, so this is definitely not black and white decision. We do highly value constructive feedback and try to align on the input we get from the field. We also understand that it might seem that it takes too long every now and then, but everyone from MS side is working hard to ensure that modern experiences will also support needed scenarios.
thx for your input.
The technique that worked perfectly fine since SharePoint 2010 was UserCustomActions
► UserCustomActions worked in the first Modern Experience releases ◄
and when some names on this list reported that, Microsoft DISABLED them without notice.
UserCustomActions are still loaded when you open QuickEdit in the Modern Experience,
so I presume at least one Microsoft Engineer is now looking for a new position.
So it is not a matter of programming skills, resources or knowledge!
YOU TURNED SOMETHING OFF!
All this is starting to smell fishy
🐟 Are you guys working on something that will not allow us 100% access to the Browser DOM?
🐟 Is Edge going to be promoted as the "safest Workforce Browser", that enables more Office365 features than other browsers, just like Open-with-Explorer only works in IE?
🐟 Is all that "Sharing is caring" just a smoke screen, and has Satya chosen to finish that battle Microsoft started in 1995, when they tried to claim the Internet.
I really appreciate your input Danny and you know we are both thinking the same way. We have had simmilar discussions when all this modern stuff startet in the good old o365 Yammer Network already. I am totaly with you and what really scares me is the fact that Microsoft is putting so much effort into trying to break customizations (look at the article from Vesa...).
And yes, there are still ways to customize, but I will never mention those (bugs/features) again because we know what happend last time.... I asked for support and the posibillities got killed....
So what I am looking for this time is input from the community on "if and how" people out there are actually using this modern stuff. The way I see it, the modern experience is awesome from a technology point of view. But it lacks so many features that it seems hard to believe that people are actually using it in real world projects.
I was hoping, some comments here would prove me wrong. And I am trying to find out what other customers are doing and how they are dealing with this.
Asking this question in the developer community might not be the best idea and I am aware of this. But I am also seriously looking for feedback. The Uservoice thread i have startet will only show the people that share my thinking, but I am not able to find out about the people that like the new experience. And neither will it tell me about what people out there are really using.
•Are they sticking to classic?
•Don't they care because they are still onprem? (I personally believe this must be the reason why people are still so quiet...)
•Are they already making plans to move back to onprem?
•Do they even care about the modern experience and groups and teams and....
•Are they really using and loving it?And the other questions go to MS:
•Why are you doing all this?
•Don't you want customizations anymore? If so, why?
•Do you think (or does your monitoring show you...) people don't need it?
•Why are you not reacting to the uservoice thread anymore? It is one of the three most popular ones.... (https://sharepoint.uservoice.com/forums/329214-sites-and-collaboration/suggestions/13385364-allow-javascript-customization-and-css-branding-th)And the last questions go to VesaJuvonen :
•AFAIK the PnP team is monitoring the usage of PnP. Are there any statistics you can share about the number of tenants that are using customizations in O365 compared to the tenants that are not using it but still show significant usage of sharepoint online?
•Personally I am only seeing companies move to sharepoint online within a few countries within europe. And of course companies within the U.S. But in most companies, sharepoint online is still beeing looked at very cautious compared to onprem. Is this reality or am I just wrong with that, looking at the PnP statistics?
