Forum Discussion

umamasurkar28's avatar
umamasurkar28
Icon for Microsoft rankMicrosoft
Nov 18, 2025

Microsoft Zero Trust Assessment v2: Operationalizing Security with Precision

In an era where cyber threats evolve faster than ever, organizations can’t afford blind spots. Zero Trust is no longer optional it’s the foundation of modern security. With the release of the Microsoft Zero Trust Assessment v2, enterprises now have a powerful tool to measure, prioritize, and remediate security gaps with actionable intelligence. 

 

What Is Zero Trust Assessment v2?

The Zero Trust Assessment is a security posture evaluation tool designed to help organizations operationalize Zero Trust principles. It automates checks across hundreds of configuration items aligned with:

  • Secure Future Initiative (SFI)
  • Zero Trust pillars: Identity, Devices, Applications, Data, Infrastructure and Networks
  • Industry standards: NIST, CISA, CIS
  • Microsoft’s internal security baselines
  • Insights from thousands of real-world customer implementations
How Does It Work?

The assessment follows a structured, automated workflow:

1. Data Collection & Configuration Analysis
  • Scans your Microsoft 365 environment and connected workloads.
  • Evaluates identity configurations (e.g., MFA enforcement, conditional access policies).
  • Reviews device compliance (e.g., Intune policies, OS hardening).
  • Pulls telemetry from Azure AD, Microsoft Defender, and other integrated services.
2. Automated Testing Against Standards
  • Runs hundreds of tests mapped to Zero Trust principles.
  • Benchmarks your settings against:
    • NIST Cybersecurity Framework
    • CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model
    • Microsoft security baselines
  • Flags misconfigurations and policy gaps.
3. Risk Scoring & Prioritization
  • Assigns risk levels based on:
    • Impact (how critical the gap is)
    • Effort (complexity of remediation)
  • Provides a prioritized list of actions so you can focus on what matters most.
4. Actionable Recommendations
  • Generates clear remediation steps not vague advice.
  • Links to Microsoft Learn and security documentation for quick implementation.
  • Suggests policy templates and automation scripts where applicable.
5. Comprehensive Reporting
  • Delivers a detailed report with:
    • Trends over time
    • Risk heatmaps
    • Compliance scores
  • Enables executive dashboards for leadership visibility.
Integration with Microsoft Security Tools

Zero Trust Assessment v2 doesn’t operate in isolation it integrates seamlessly with Microsoft’s security ecosystem:

  • Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
    Detects device vulnerabilities and feeds compliance data into the assessment.
  • Microsoft Intune
    Ensures device configuration policies align with Zero Trust principles.
  • Microsoft Sentinel
    Correlates assessment findings with threat intelligence for proactive incident response.
  • Azure AD Conditional Access
    Validates identity policies like MFA and session controls.
  • Microsoft Purview
    Extends Zero Trust to data governance and compliance.

This integration ensures that remediation steps can be automated and enforced across your environment, reducing manual effort and accelerating security posture improvement.

Sample Remediation Workflow Diagram

Below is a simplified view of how remediation flows after an assessment:

This closed-loop process ensures continuous improvement and operationalization of Zero Trust.

Key Benefits
  • Speed: Automates what used to take weeks of manual audits.
  • Accuracy: Aligns with global standards and Microsoft’s own security posture.
  • Operationalization: Moves Zero Trust from theory to practice with actionable steps.
  • Future-Ready: Tests will soon be available enabling continuous improvement.
Why This Matters

Blind spots in identity or device security can lead to breaches, financial loss and reputational damage.

Zero Trust Assessment v2 helps you:

  • Respond faster to evolving threats.
  • Reduce risk with prioritized remediation.
  • Build resilience by embedding Zero Trust principles into daily operations.

 

1 Reply

  • GökselATAKAN's avatar
    GökselATAKAN
    Copper Contributor

    I downloaded when i see on LinkedIn and ran the Microsoft Zero Trust Assessment v2 tool with the required permissions. The results were quite good overall. it gives a clear picture of current posture and highlights gaps in Identity and Device settings.

    However, I have a few observations and suggestions:

    1. It would be even more useful if it were integrated into the Defender side (like a dashboard in Microsoft Defender) rather than being a standalone PowerShell module/report.
    2. There are already many tools in this space, and one of the earlier tools, the “Maester” tool, appears to work in a very similar way in fact, I’ve heard that this new tool may even be incorporated into Maester.
    3. My suggestion: Microsoft could consider building a unified dashboard-style page that brings together all the tools that matter rather than having many separate ones. This would help in having a consolidated view and reduce tool-sprawl.

      What it does well
      • The tool automates checks across many configuration items aligned with the Zero Trust pillars, industry standards (such as NIST, CISA, CIS) and Microsoft’s internal baselines. 
      • It produces actionable recommendations and links to remediation steps; not just “here’s a problem” but “here’s how to fix it”. 
      • The tool is open-source, which gives transparency and the ability for community input. 

        Areas for improvement / limitations
      • The tool currently appears to focus first on the Identity and Devices pillars of Zero Trust. The other pillars (Applications, Data, Infrastructure/Network) are to come. 
      • Because it runs as a PowerShell module and produces a report (or HTML/Excel output), it doesn’t feel fully “native” in the central security console/dashboard of Microsoft. Some users state they expect deeper integration.
      • With many tools in the Microsoft ecosystem (and third-party tools), tool sprawl becomes a challenge. Having multiple separate assessment tools means multiple reports, consoles, possibly overlapping functionality.
      • There may be challenges around scaling and complexity: large tenants may take “several hours” to run depending on environment size.

        Overall suggestion
        Given its strengths and limitations, it seems the tool is valuable, but would gain increased adoption and usability if it were:
      • More tightly integrated into the main Microsoft security platform (e.g., visible in Defender portal)
      • Expanded to cover all Zero Trust pillars more rapidly
      • Presented via a unified dashboard that aggregates results from this and other assessments/tools (so security teams have one “pane of glass”)
      • Optimised for large/complex tenants with minimal performance/time issues

Resources