Forum Discussion
Anthony_Weaver
Dec 04, 2019Copper Contributor
Sensitivity labels
I want to publish sensitivity labels; use sensitive data types to automatically label files with a sensitivity label and then create DLP policies based on a label. Is all this possible now?
Dec 04, 2019
Hi @Anthony Weaver
You can publish sensitivity labels
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/sensitivity-labels
You can automatically label files based on sensitive info type
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/apply-sensitivity-label-automatically
You cannot base DLP policies on sensitivity labels currently, only retention labels and sensitive content types. There is a uservoice open for it currently.
https://office365.uservoice.com/forums/289138-office-365-security-compliance/suggestions/35826649-create-dlp-policy-based-on-sensitivity-label
Hope that answers your question
Best, Chris
You can publish sensitivity labels
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/sensitivity-labels
You can automatically label files based on sensitive info type
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/apply-sensitivity-label-automatically
You cannot base DLP policies on sensitivity labels currently, only retention labels and sensitive content types. There is a uservoice open for it currently.
https://office365.uservoice.com/forums/289138-office-365-security-compliance/suggestions/35826649-create-dlp-policy-based-on-sensitivity-label
Hope that answers your question
Best, Chris
- Anthony_WeaverDec 05, 2019Copper Contributor
- Dec 13, 2019Hi Anthony_Weaver
Per Article
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/data-loss-prevention-policies
You can currently use only a retention label as a condition, not a sensitivity label. We're currently working on support for using a sensitivity label in this condition.
No timeframe given. Unfortunately no articles on the Microsoft 365 Roadmap yet
Best, Chris- JonasBackDec 13, 2019Iron Contributor
ChrisHoardMVP Thanks for confirming this. You have any idea why that is so? Maybe the Information Protection team thinks it's not really necessary since the actual document protected by Information Protection is encrypted and should not be able to be opened by unahtorized anyway so they simply don't think we need to DLP protect it?