Forum Discussion
owinoakelo
Microsoft
Sep 26, 2022Azure AD SCIM Validator is in General Availability (GA) Status
You can now validate the compatibility of your SCIM provisioning endpoint and Azure AD code base using our Azure AD SCIM Validator. This tool can be used by ISVs who want to build SCIM compatible ser...
marhav
Oct 04, 2023Copper Contributor
Hello.
These days, I'm working on implementing support for the SCIM protocol into a client application and using the SCIM Validator to check its functionality. A few days ago, the SCIM Validator sent me a multi-value PATCH operation for nested parameters in this format:
"Operations": [
{
"op":"replace",
"value":
{
"name.givenName":"Aron",
"name.familyName":"Raul",
}
}
]
Today, I noticed that instead of the original nine tests, a tenth one, "PATCH User- Disable User," has appeared, and the format of the patch replace operation has changed. Now, the multi-value operation for nested parameters looks like this:
"Operations": [
{
"op": "replace",
"value": {
"name": {
"givenName": "Trevion",
"familyName": "Larissa"
},
}
}
]
Does an SCIM client that wants to collaborate with AAD need to support both the above-mentioned variations, or will the one from today be sufficient?
- owinoakeloOct 04, 2023
Microsoft
marhav This is an issue on our end and an appropriate fix has been deployed and is rolling out now. Please support the one you received previously.