Forum Discussion
Exchange 2016 Security updates
Hello. If I am just applying Exchange monthly security updates which we do using our software distribution product, not Windows update, do I still need to put the server in maintenance mode like I would have to with a CU? It seems like starting with Exchange 2013, the update process has become more complicated than with 2010. Any particular reason for this? In 2010, I simply did a switch over of all the DB's, ran security updates or installed a CU, switched back and did the other server. Done....
7 Replies
- Deleted
Deleted https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=105091
MS recommends to restart your server before and after update. Restarting a server without putting in into maintenance mode is not the best idea.
So first start the maintenance mode which will switch over the database copies, the restart your server, turn off antivirus software, patch it, restart again, turn on antivirus, switch off maintenance mode and finally, when you‘re in a hurry, start redistribution of the DBs.
- DeletedSo what happens if a server restarts on it's own. Servers do that. A bugcheck or an exception and there's an unplanned restart. My assumption is all the DB's fail over to the mailbox server and when the rebooted server comes back up, all is good. Just seems like they make you go through a lot of trouble just to patch a server. Flushing queues, stopping the cluster service etc. Guess the question is what is so different about 2013/16 than 2010 that you have to do all this. Example, MBX1 is running a bit slow and a reboot is needed. I can't just activate DB's on MBX2 and reboot the thing? I have to put it in maintenance mode first? Seem ridiculous.
- Deleted
Deleted If it seems ridiculous to you, don’t do it. Your server, your decision.