Forum Discussion
Advanced threat protection - Whitelist Users/Internal Mail Servers?
Greetings, Since implementing advanced threat protection we have recieved many complaints from end users across the organizaton that use a printer to scan a file in and email it to themselves. Afte...
Hello Victor,
I did find that thread and implemented the workaround. Thanks for the reference. Is this something you plan on building into the ATP Settings Page any time?
Victor_Ungureanu
Microsoft
MicrosoftI'm not aware of such a plan and, even if it exists, I don't think that's a priority because there is this possibility to use a transport rule.
I'm guessing that the delay in receiving the emails is the reason for which you would like to be able to exclude some senders from scanning. I know that it's not a good solution for your scenario, but there is a new feature called Dynamic Delivery for Safe Attachments (https://blogs.office.com/2016/01/14/leading-the-way-in-the-fight-against-dangerous-email-threats/) which was designed exactly for this purpose, to mitigate the impact of the delayed delivery, so there were some investments done in this area.
I'm guessing that the delay in receiving the emails is the reason for which you would like to be able to exclude some senders from scanning. I know that it's not a good solution for your scenario, but there is a new feature called Dynamic Delivery for Safe Attachments (https://blogs.office.com/2016/01/14/leading-the-way-in-the-fight-against-dangerous-email-threats/) which was designed exactly for this purpose, to mitigate the impact of the delayed delivery, so there were some investments done in this area.
This still has not been addressed by Microsoft in a practical manner. The dynamic delivery does little if anything for delays that can take upwards of 5 min
