Forum Discussion
Shompinice
Jan 29, 2021Iron Contributor
Thorough visual refresh, creating an Edge that fully complies with the Fluent Design System design.
I know that I have seen the new icon system. For non-professional users, what is the most intuitive and smooth design? I think it is "acrylic", we need acrylic, we need XAML controls (such as context menu), without these, I don't understand how this design can be called "Fluent design"?
1.Regarding the sidebar, I noticed that it is trying to be consistent with the new version of the sidebar, but it is still far from it.
https://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml/pull/4009
This is a new version of the navigation bar style discussed in the XAML/WinUI3 community.
Huge difference, for example, why is there such a huge margin? The character size and line height are also inconsistent, so this doesn’t even look like a company’s product, but Edge copied the Windows design.
2.The second difference is the context menu
https://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml/pull/3958
This is a discussion about the context menu style in the XAML/WinUI3 community.
This is its style (unfinished)
This is the menu of the new Windows Insider touch keyboard
https://blogs.windows.com/windows-insider/2021/01/27/announcing-windows-10-insider-preview-build-213...
This is the menu of Edge
Microsoft Edge on Chromium: What Does It Mean?
I don't mean to say that you have to make the context menu like this, but if you use XAML controls, its style will automatically change with system updates. I noticed that some menus in Windows 10 2004 have adopted rounded rectangles. Another difference is that the menu has an acrylic effect, which I think is too important. If there is no transparent effect, I think it cannot be called a "fluent design"
- KamSilver Contributor
Shompinice LOL I can't wait to ask you this:
Why is your profile pic to the left of the feedback button?!
- I like the rounded right-click menus and the transparency effect on them
- msekmfb1Iron Contributor
I agree, this would look much better: