Forum Discussion
Stable version of Edge insider browser
- Thanks for the discussion. We feel this has come to a natural conclusion, so we are closing this off to new comments - it's good to be aware of using content from other sites, but we do understand this was used to help make an argument rather than passing it off as your own content. But it doesn't seem like anything productive will come from further discussion here.
tomscharbach wrote:HotCakeX "First of all that's Microsoft's Copyright, those are pictures from Microsoft Windows. no one can claim Copyright for them. Second, the text is not copyrighted, it's trivial ordinary text shared and distributed on different forums and websites and I could argue that I wrote them myself. By the way, something else for you to learn: Copyrightable authorship is original expression contributed by an author that contains at least a minimum amount of creativity. ... An individual work that appears on a website can be registered if it constitutes copyrightable subject matter and contains a sufficient amount of original authorship. Nothing about that text is original, unique or creative."
Whatever the merits of your interpretation of copyright law as applicable to reproducing materials from newspaper, magazine and online media articles without attribution, you might want to review the "Microsoft Community Code of Conduct", specifically this provision: "Cite the source of anything you post or upload, if it isn't your own original content. Be honest about your sources."
I don't have anything further to say on the subject. If you think that my comments are inappropriate, please feel free to report them to the moderators.
It was my post and what I experience and the pictures are from Microsoft Windows, no copyright infringement or anything happened (nothing was even copyrightable) , but accusing and blaming other members is against code of conduct and I have reported it.
HotCakeX "It was my post and what I experience and the pictures are from Microsoft Windows, no copyright infringement or anything happened (nothing was even copyrightable) , but accusing and blaming other members is against code of conduct and I have reported it."
In for a dime, in for a dollar, I guess.
To help Microsoft access my comments, the following is a roadmap underlying my observation that "A quiet note: The following material (text and graphic) appears to be directly reproduced from parts of the article "https://techdows.com/2019/10/you-cant-uninstall-chromium-based-microsoft-edge-stable-from-windows-10.html", dated October 12, 2019, appearing on the Techdows website."
Taking your post as a whole:
(1) The following constitutes original content:
(2-A) The following content appears to have been reproduced from the Technows article without attribution:
(2-B) This is the content as it appears in the Technows article:
(3-A) The following content appears to have been reproduced from the Technows article without attribution:
(3-B) This is the content as it appears in the Technows article:
(4-A) The following content appears to have been reproduced from the Technows article without attribution:
(4-B) This is the content as it appears in the Technows article:
I also stand by my observation that reproduction of this material without attribution is "a possible copyright violation". When I posted my comment, I noted that "I assume that the lack of attribution in your original post was an oversight." I expected, frankly, that you would quickly correct the situation by attributing the reproduced materials to Technows. I did not expect your response, which I find baffling. I leave it to Microsoft to sort out (a) whether there is a "a possible copyright violation", (b) whether either or both of us has violated the "https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/page/codeofconduct", and (c) take appropriate action.
- Spoiler
tomscharbach wrote:HotCakeX "It was my post and what I experience and the pictures are from Microsoft Windows, no copyright infringement or anything happened (nothing was even copyrightable) , but accusing and blaming other members is against code of conduct and I have reported it."
In for a dime, in for a dollar, I guess.
To help Microsoft access my comments, the following is a roadmap underlying my observation that "A quiet note: The following material (text and graphic) appears to be directly reproduced from parts of the article "You can’t uninstall Chromium-based Microsoft Edge Stable from Windows 10", dated October 12, 2019, appearing on the Techdows website."
Taking your post as a whole:
(1) The following constitutes original content:
(2-A) The following content appears to have been reproduced from the Technows article without attribution:
(2-B) This is the content as it appears in the Technows article:
(3-A) The following content appears to have been reproduced from the Technows article without attribution:
(3-B) This is the content as it appears in the Technows article:
(4-A) The following content appears to have been reproduced from the Technows article without attribution:
(4-B) This is the content as it appears in the Technows article:
I also stand by my observation that reproduction of this material without attribution is "a possible copyright violation". When I posted my comment, I noted that "I assume that the lack of attribution in your original post was an oversight." I expected, frankly, that you would quickly correct the situation by attributing the reproduced materials to Technows. I did not expect your response, which I find baffling. I leave it to Microsoft to sort out (a) whether there is a "a possible copyright violation", (b) whether either or both of us has violated the "Microsoft Community Code of Conduct", and (c) take appropriate action.
Okay now this is beyond a constructive feedback (which was noted) and it's become Harassment and annoying.
you mentioned your feedback and now you keep Accusing and Harassing me repetitively.at first when I opened this topic you denied it and talked against it,
then when you lost that argument, you changed subject to copyright and threatened me with legal actions that I am violating copyright law.
again after losing that argument and after I proved that material is Microsoft's Copyrighted and the text is not copyrightable, you changed subject Again and accused me of violating the Code of Conduct.this is clearly a Personal Attack. you are obviously looking for a way to hurt and harm me. at first none of these were a problem for you but after losing each argument, you changed the subject and started abusing me with a different off topic subject. this is Nothing but Abuse and I don't stand it, I've reported all of this.