Forum Discussion
FSLogix profile configurations for App virtualization only scenario
Soo Kuan Teo curious to know the specific reason around why it would still be needed for remote app only scenario.
bhushangawale, I may be mistaken in this, however it's preferable to have the UPD/FSLogix containers stored in a central location, as opposed to locally on each host's C drive. If you're deploying RemoteApps via WVD then I can see no reason not to take advantage of the benefits of the more streamlined FXLogix containers instead of the more usual UPD storage on a network accessible drive. Also I'm not aware of how to configure that location under the WVD way of doing things. Likely FSLogix is your only real method of configuring where they will reside. It's also Microsoft best practice at this point for WVD deployments, even if the user profiles are goign to be small due to only being RemoteApp deployments.
- Soo Kuan TeoApr 28, 2020
Microsoft
The apps you published may also have user data that needs to be stored in user profile, for example Outlook.