Forum Discussion
Unexpected Service Principal Additions After Purview Label Schema Migration
Hi everyone,
I recently migrated our Microsoft Purview label schema in our tenant and noticed some interesting audit log entries right after the migration. Specifically, Entra ID recorded Add service principal actions for:
- Microsoft Edge management service
- Purview Ecosystem (https://api.purview.microsoft.com)
Both events were logged under my admin account, with the User-Agent showing kiota-dotnet/1.16.4, which suggests an automated process or Microsoft Graph SDK interaction.
Here are some details:
- Operation: Add service principal
- Result: Success
- Tags: disableLegacyUserImpersonationClient, disableLegacyUserImpersonationResource, and for Purview: GitCreatedApp
- Triggered at: The exact time I completed the label schema migration.
My question:
- Is this expected behavior when migrating Purview label schemas?
- Are these service principals required for Purview and Edge management integration?
- Any best practices to confirm these additions are legitimate and secure?
Thanks in advance for your insights!
Best regards
Stephan
2 Replies
- David_C06Copper Contributor
Hello Stephen, sorry but not clear for me ?
- did you import/migrate your Sensitivity labels structure from one M365 tenant to another ? like in a Merge and acquisition scenario ?
- are you talking about the migration of sensitivity label schema to the new label scheme planned by Microsoft on group label usage described in article below?
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/migrate-sensitivity-label-scheme
If you talk of the migration to new label scheme article link I added, I need on my side to size the risk impact of this migration to my existing M365 tenant with 22000 users ...Hopefully I have a LAB to validate it. Your feed backs might interest me also. Are you using sub labels applying protection on Specified recipients ? or critical group based labels like us e.g Secret/Finance or Secret/Legal ?
- StephanGeeIron Contributor
The migration of sensitivity label schema to the new label scheme planned by Microsoft on group label usage described in article below?
Sorry for the too long waiting time - i must have not seen the mail