Forum Widgets
Latest Discussions
MECM MSIX Application Creation Error
Apologies if this needs to go into the MECM forum. I receive the following error message when trying to import an MSIX into MECM: 'Error: Part URI is not valid per rules defined in the Open Packaging Conventions specification'. The MSIX is for Adobe InDesign 2026. I have successfully created MSIX packages for other Adobe Creative Suite products and imported them into MECM. I have been through the manifest for the InDesign MSIX I created, the file system, the metadata (such as package name) and can see nothing that would trip it up. I have also looked for any path lengths over 255 and found none. The only thing I found which I think may be a problem is in the content_types.xml - a tilda in the application extension entry: <Default Extension="xml~" ContentType="application/octet-stream" /> As usual, there is not much online. I have skimmed through the OPC specification, but can see nothing about limitations. Have anyone else come across this problem?CrazylarryApr 13, 2026Brass Contributor65Views0likes4Comments- JohnMcC1983Jan 27, 2026Copper Contributor56Views0likes1Comment
Trying to MSIX package LOB application that needs TWAIN access
So I think this isn't possible but I just wanted to ask. I've a LOB application that needs to access TWAIN scanning devices. How this works in a normal environment is that the TWAINDSM.dll (TWAIN Data source manager) is loaded from c:\windows\system32 This then scans the C:\Windows\twain_32 or C:\Windows\twain_64 depending on if the app is x86 or x64 The scanning manufacturers will have their TWAIN drivers installed to c:\windows\twain_32 (or 64) as subfolders and the TWAIN Data source manager scans these subfolders for available TWAIN devices that can be connected to. All this breaks down in an MSIX environment because the container doesn't have access to C:\windows\twain_32\ManfactureDriverN folder It can see the folders and when the TWAINDSM tries to initialize the driver it fails, most likely due to sandbox limitations. Does anyone know of a solution to this, or apps like this will always need to stick to MSI packaging because of this limiation. Thanks.oconobeeDec 09, 2025Copper Contributor356Views1like7CommentsMicrosoft MSIX Packaging Tool Fails to create package due to AppXManifest (Typelib/Version/LibFlag)
The MMPT will fail to save the package after capturing an installation of Altova XmlSpy Enterprise. This is due to the MMPT reading a reading a registry string value for a Com Version and adding it into the AppXManifest in an incorrect form that violates the COM schema extension validation ST_VersionCom. The error from the MMPT log: [11/10/2025 11:17:46 AM] [Debug] MakeAppx : error: Failure at packageWriter2->Close( manifestStream, contentGroupMapStream.Get()) - 0x80080204 - The specified package format is not valid: The package manifest is not valid. [11/10/2025 11:17:46 AM] [Debug] MakeAppx : error: Error info: /*[local-name()="Package" and namespace-uri()="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/manifest/foundation/windows10"]/*[local-name()="Extensions" and namespace-uri()="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/manifest/foundation/windows10"][1]/*[local-name()="Extension" and namespace-uri()="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/manifest/com/windows10"][1]/*[local-name()="ComInterface" and namespace-uri()="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/manifest/com/windows10"][1]/*[local-name()="TypeLib" and namespace-uri()="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/manifest/com/windows10"][2]/*[local-name()="Version" and namespace-uri()="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/manifest/com/windows10"][1]/@LibraryFlag [11/10/2025 11:17:46 AM] [Debug] '#0' violates pattern constraint of '[0-9a-fA-F]'. [11/10/2025 11:17:46 AM] [Debug] The attribute 'LibraryFlag' with value '#0' failed to parse. [11/10/2025 11:17:46 AM] [Debug] Cleaning up output file "\\?\%UserProfile%\Desktop\Altova-XmlSpy_28.0.0.0_x64__xwfzvwzp69w2e.msix". [11/10/2025 11:17:46 AM] [Debug] MakeAppx : error: Failure at (CreatePackage( overwrite, hashAlgorithm, fileList, outputPath, manifestStream.Get(), forceCompressionNone, performanceOptions, encryptPackage, encryptionOptions, cgmPath, mainPackagePathForResourceExemption, makepriExeFullPath)) - 0x80080204 - The specified package format is not valid: The package manifest is not valid. [11/10/2025 11:17:46 AM] [Debug] MakeAppx : error: Package creation failed. [11/10/2025 11:17:46 AM] [Debug] MakeAppx : error: 0x80080204 - The specified package format is not valid: The package manifest is not valid. [11/10/2025 11:17:46 AM] [Error] MakeAppx.exe failed, exit code = 1 [11/10/2025 11:17:46 AM] [Error] Error Finalizing Package: Process MakeAppx.exe failed with exit code 1. The values in the registry placed by the application that were captured: And the produced AppXManifest file contained: <com:TypeLib Id="744838d2-7537-47e2-affa-6e0d5fbb61c9"> <com:Version VersionNumber="1.0" LocaleId="0" LibraryFlag="#0"> <com:Win32Path Path="VFS\ProgramFilesX64\Altova\SharedBetweenVersions\AltovaScc32to64Bridge.exe" /> </com:Version> </com:TypeLib> As a workaround, it is possible to manually remove the '#' character from the LibraryFlag field in the AppXManifest allows the package to save. The MMPT should properly read this value as if it were a REG_DWORD of value 0 and generate a valid AppXmanifest. This is a common registry interpretation to make. Alternatively, as the value of 0 is meaningless, the parameter could be dropped, but if the vendor had requested "#1" this should also be handled.128Views0likes0CommentsShortcut icons disappear
Hello! I wanted to add shortcuts of some applications to my desktop, then I found out it's impossible for a normal user. You have to either attach it to the task bar or the Start menu, and pray Microsoft won't mess up with your Start menu layout in the next update (happened twice already). I found out this discussion and followed the instructions (going to explorer.exe shell:AppsFolder and creating shortcuts from there), but it only worked for a few minutes. In less than 10 minutes, two of the six shortcuts I've created using this method had their icons replaced by white paper icons. After restarting the computer, only one remained with its original icon (Figma Desktop). And after updating Figma, it completely disappeared (not leaving just a white paper, the shortcut completely vanished from the desktop). When I go to the same folder, they are iconless there as well. So, how can I make desktop shortcuts that keep their nice icons even after restarting or updating the software? Thanks in advance!WicCaesarOct 31, 2025Copper Contributor99Views0likes0CommentsAdd Environment Variable to MSIX package using PSF Fixups in Packaging Tool - what am I missing?
Hi everyone, I am currently testing packaging apps into the MSIX format and have been successful for any simple installers. Now that I am trying to package more advanced installers I have to utilize PSF Fixups, in which I have issues with the Environment Fixup. Even though I have read up on previous discussions regarding this, I simply cannot get this fixup to be successfully added and recognized within the MSIX App. I am judging this based on that the same app will tell in its own app options whether the environment variable is available or not. Some key info (Tried attaching several screenshots, but it wilI not let me. Hopefully the necessary information comes across): Using MSIX Packaging Tool version 1.2024.405.0 Using the included PSF Fixup for Environment Variables within MSIX Packaging Tool. All PSF Fixup files are included in the MSIX Package. In the manifest file the executable "PsfLauncher64.exe" is pointed at. Basically, the config.json is formatted in the following way if I were to change out anything referring to the actual app name. What am I possibly missing out on or have misunderstood here? Any help in leading me into the right direction is very much appreciated, thanks!HanessaSep 22, 2025Copper Contributor369Views0likes5CommentsReset user choice for windows.protocol tel:
Hi everyone, we ship an MSIX that registers a full-trust Dialer.exe as a windows.protocol handler for tel: so users can place calls from Outlook etc. Goal After installing our MSIX, we’d like Windows to show the “How do you want to open this?” prompt again for tel: so users see the new option. With our old MSI this was easy, we deleted HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Shell\Associations\UrlAssociations\<protocol>\UserChoice via the manifest entry: <RemoveRegistryKey Id="WipeDialerOnInstall" Root="HKCU" Key="SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Shell\Associations\UrlAssociations\tel\UserChoice" Action="removeOnInstall"/> Problem With MSIX there seems to be no manifest option to mimic that. We tried deleting UserChoice on first app start (HKCU, RegDeleteTree/SHDeleteKey), but it did not work. Questions Is there any supported or recommended way to trigger the default-app prompt (or clear the choice) for a specific protocol when using MSIX? Is deleting UserChoice from a full-trust MSIX app considered supported/allowed for Store submissions? Any guidance or stance appreciated! Thanks!EDNTAug 28, 2025Copper Contributor257Views0likes3CommentsI'm not seeing what I expected to see with Windows Application Packaging
I'm following along in a YouTube video I found that covers MSIX. I've created a simple WPF app in .NET 9, which is just a Hello World app. Then I added the Windows Application Packaging project. Or at least that's what I'm trying to do. What I got was two new projects added to my VS solution. Given my app's name is MyApp, one of the new projects is called MyAppInstaller, and the other new app is called "MyAppInstaller (Package)". I was expecting to see only the MyAppInstaller project added. I'm wondering if I've done something wrong.Rod-FAug 23, 2025Iron Contributor112Views0likes1Comment
Tags
- MSIX76 Topics
- appinstaller9 Topics
- msix packaging tool7 Topics
- APPX5 Topics
- MSIX Packaging Tools4 Topics
- appattach3 Topics
- MSIX AppAttach launch failure3 Topics
- MSIX LIMITATIONS3 Topics
- Access MSIX Container3 Topics
- UWP3 Topics