Forum Widgets
Latest Discussions
Domain controller showing "Not ready for migration"
I want to get the MDI sensor upgraded to v3 on our domain controllers. When I go into Settings > Sensors, two of our DCs are listed as "Ready for migration", but the third says "Not ready for migration". As far as I can tell, this DC meets all the prerequisites listed at Migrate from sensor v2.x to sensor v3.x - Microsoft Defender for Identity | Microsoft Learn. In the Troubleshooting section of that article, it says "hover over the status on the Sensors page to see a tooltip that lists the reasons the server doesn't meet the migration prerequisites", but I see no such tooltip, no matter where I hover. I tried opening a support request with Microsoft 365 Support, only to be told that I have to contact Azure support. We don't currently have an Azure support plan, so I guess we don't qualify for support. Anyone got any suggestions for things I can try?SolvedRyanSteele-CoVJul 30, 2026Steel Contributor43Views0likes2CommentsVery High Increase in CPU activity after Update Microsoft Defender for Identity sensor
All our servers that are running this sensor (DCs, Certificate servers, AD Connect servers) showed a massive increase in average CPU utilization from virtually straight after the sensor was automatically updated to version 2.254.19112.470 (late night UK time). Two of our DCs are sitting on 100% CPU today and we can't find anything to resolve it. Has anyone else seen this since running this version and if so what actions did you take ? How would we go back to rolling back to the previous version when it appears it will just be automatically updated soon after ? This is our monitoring of CPU utilization from one of the majorly affected DCs but every server with the sensor had the exact same graph showing a major increase in CPU at the same date and time i.e. just after the sensor was updated.SolvedTomHazJan 19, 2026Tin Contributor1.3KViews4likes7CommentsChange password for krbtgt account
What is the criteria that MDI uses to determine whether the https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-for-identity/security-posture-assessments/accounts#change-password-for-krbtgt-account recommendation has been completed? I'm working with an org where the passwordLastSet attribute on the krbtgt account says "never", yet this recommendation is showing "Completed".SolvedrgsteeleNov 16, 2025Tin Contributor369Views1like6CommentsMDI AD CS sensor not switching from removed DC
We are in the process of replacing our Domain Controllers. What I found is that the MDI sensor on our PKI server is still stuck with a domain controller which has been demoted and removed from the domain. (Sensor version: 2.250.18972.18405) I guess, if I reinstall the sensor, it will find a new domain controller - but what if it finds a DC that is to be decommissioned? Should I reinstall the sensor until it choses a "new" DC? Thank you in advance, DanielSolvedkuglidaniNov 07, 2025Tin Contributor359Views0likes2CommentsIncorrect Secure Score recommendation - Remove unnecessary replication permissions
Hi, In our environment, we got the "Remove unnecessary replication permissions for Entra Connect AD DS Connector Account" secure score recommendation. Based on the https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-for-identity/remove-replication-permissions-microsoft-entra-connect replication permission is needed when PHS is in use. We are using PTA, but PHS is also enabled as a fallback. On the Entra Connect server I ran the following: Import-Module ADSyncDiagnostics Invoke-ADSyncDiagnostics -PasswordSync The result is: Password Hash Synchronization cloud configuration is enabled If I remove the replication permission, we soon receive an alert that password hash sync did not occour. Is it normal? I would say that the sensor should be able to detect PHS usage hence not recommending to remove the permissions. Thank you in advance, DanielSolved482Views0likes3CommentsMDI Activation vs. Manual/Scripted Install.
Hi, we recently noticed the new ‘Activation’ feature MDI added with MDE in our portal (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-for-identity/deploy/activate-capabilities), and we’re very interested in the capabilities, but concerned about one thing the documentation states. In the documentation, it says that the activation is just the ‘core’ protections, while the installer package is a more robust defense. I was wondering if there were key differences, like losing out on some stuff, or if both installations would cover the same activities, etc. before we go through with preferring one method to the other. Thanks!Solveddhorne25Mar 12, 2025Copper Contributor361Views0likes2CommentsEasiest way to view remediated risk detections?
I'm looking in Lighthouse at a series of risky logins that are remediated. The thing is, this tenant previously experienced a breach that got remediated, so I'm trying to be extra cautious. When I click "View in Entra", it brings up no risk detections. If I navigate to Protection > Risky Activities > Risky Sign-Ins I get nothing. Switching to all statuses, I still get nothing. Same thing happens if I got to Risk Detections, nothing. Short of bringing up each user, and checking every single login to try to find what was risky, is there a way I can see these once the statuses are remediated? It seems like I SHOULD able to... But here are the different ways I've tried filtering Risk detections: Risky Sign-Ins Trying to understand the users popping in Lighthouse, but they don't appear with any of these filters (or the defaults).... Anyone able to advise? THanksSolvedunderQualifriedJan 28, 2025Iron Contributor255Views0likes2CommentsUnable to access Update 3 for Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics 1.9
Hi, Microsoft Tech Community and Ricky Simpson from Microsoft, I cannot download Update 3 for Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics 1.9. Whenever I tried to access the download update from this https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/description-of-update-3-for-microsoft-advanced-threat-analytics-1-9-954cb9b7-9646-78ce-2000-2a257b64df7c, it seemed the ID number 56725 was missing, and an error code of 404 was returned. Tried URL: https://www.microsoft.com/download/details.aspx?id=56725 Hope you can fix this problem as soon as possible, because Microsoft ATA still plays an important role in most of the enterprise network, including my company's network. Best regards for all people in the communitySolvedshiroinekotfsOct 15, 2024Brass Contributor659Views0likes3CommentsMissing remediation actions
Hi everyone, Remediation actions such as Disable/Enable user in AD, Force password reset are currently not available through the Defender portal (user page, advanced hunting). Anyone aware of this change? https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-for-identity/remediation-actions#supported-actionsSolvedkoroioanSep 25, 2024Copper Contributor768Views1like1CommentMDI & gMSA config
Hi, We have followed the MDI Deployment guide from Microsoft: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-for-identity/deploy/deploy-defender-identity We have also cross referenced this guide: https://jeffreyappel.nl/how-to-implement-defender-for-identity-and-configure-all-prerequisites/ The MDI Portal shows the gMSA account. The MDI agents are running fine and reporting to the MDI Portal. However, when we look at Services.msc on the Domain Controllers, the MDI agent runs under the security context of "Local Service" and not the gMSA account. Can anyone advise us on whether this is correct? or should we see the gMSA account in Service.msc console? And what other config may be required to make it run under the gMSA account? Thank you SK (screenshot below)SolvedShimKwanJul 07, 2024Brass Contributor1.1KViews0likes2Comments
Tags
- Sensor52 Topics
- microsoft 365 defender45 Topics
- identity protection36 Topics
- alerts17 Topics
- security posture17 Topics
- logging14 Topics
- azure active directory11 Topics
- updates10 Topics
- requirements8 Topics
- Investigations8 Topics