MicrosoftNone of the discussions appear to be convincing as comprising mostly real public users like myself coming by to post - certainly not after the grand show of strange defence and your own comment here.
I dunno why you're telling me it is an option & voluntary choice to go passwordless and password use is still available - as if that's answering my question. It is a completely irrelevant point.
I asked why Microsoft an OS software provider would suggest this when it is not a very secure option in my opinion at all? And that is something it should take into consideration because offering the option when one of them is not secure at all for its business is just nonsensical?
I pointed out my concern - that passwordless is in fact not secure at all. That is on point for this topic. Was the expectation only for users to come by with technical support type queries or simple ones that poked holes at the feature? That's your controlled ideal narrative - don't act so surprised when I point out the big elephant in the room.
How is this any different from writing all our passwords on a piece of paper - which we all know not to do? None of you have answered that - just tried to deflect the query, using childish tactics when all of you could have just not answered and left it as a user comment.
If you can't come up with a sensible rebuttal to that - you should have just kept quiet and let my comment fade into silence instead of this circus show.
