This is great!
but... for big corps with massive geography and number of users over 50k completely anonymized data makes all these insights too general. It's basically just a fancy picture and nothing else in that case because you can't tell whether you need a global wide adoption campaign (tons of money) or more efficient and cheaper local one to boost productivity of the least "educated" region.
It's a challenge when it comes to similar analysis but with more granularity. How would you suggest to understand whether particular country or job level requires additional trainings?
How does MS approaching this challenge? You have over 100k employees (probably most of them are M365 users in your own tenant). Are you looking at completely anonymized data to understand adoption level as well?
Would be great to see some additional slices (AAD attributes?) in these dashboards in future. That would allow big companies to better understand where exactly they should focus their efforts to get the most out of M365 services.