Blog Post

Exchange Team Blog
2 MIN READ

Exchange team seeking helpdesk data

The_Exchange_Team's avatar
The_Exchange_Team
Platinum Contributor
Oct 10, 2007

One of the areas we know can be costly for our customers is the cost of having a large helpdesk staff to investigate and resolve issues reported by users. We've done an extensive scrub of MSIT's helpdesk data (pivoted by root cause rather than symptom) and have identified several areas where we can improve in future releases of exchange. For example there are a couple of key NDRs that repeatedly cause problems for users and so we're working on reducing the frequency of those where possible, and where not, having better ways of helping the end user or helpdesk engineer resolve the problem.

We've completed our analysis of MSIT's data, and now we'd like to crosscheck that information with helpdesk data from other organizations to ensure that we aren't designing a product only for ourselves [:)]. The key information we need is:

  • Preferred: Helpdesk call data specific to exchange & outlook end-users, with volume information (e.g. # of calls for each issue + length of each call), organized by root cause (example: size restriction configured incorrectly on connector resulted in NDRs)
  • Acceptable: Helpdesk call data specific to exchange & outlook end-users, with volume information (e.g. # of calls for each issue + length of each call), organized by symptom (example: user received 5.2.2 NDR)

So if you are willing to share your helpdesk data with us (please filter out any personally identifiable information first though!), we would really appreciate it – email us at exblown AT Microsoft DOT com if you're willing, and we'll work with you to figure out the data format (excel or CSV is preferred).

What do you get in return? The chance to have a clear and direct impact on the next release of exchange and um... our undying gratitude? [:)] Seriously though, although we know this will probably entail some work for those who participate, we really encourage you to do so, I can't tell you how many folks inside the product team are chomping at the bit to have more data on what are the pain points for helpdesks. When we have a more complete picture of what we're going to do to solve these problems, we'll also post it here.

- KC Lemson

Updated Jul 01, 2019
Version 2.0

15 Comments

  • I would echo bday's request about the GAL.  

    A "last updated" item in the address book UI would be nice so the users know if they have that day's version of the GAL

    A "Get Latest GAL" button would also be nice so you can force Outlook to get the current version if they _are_ running an old version.

    Thomas Price
    IT Dept.
    TEAM
  • BDay: oy... tough one. I can totally see why that would be expensive for you guys but the only solution I can think of is to include some kind of "Last updated: " in the addressbook UI to give people a hint as to the freshness. Thanks for the comment though, we'll think about this some more.
  • I don't know if this is really an Exchange issue or just stupid user edumacation. We spend a lot of time explaining why in Outlook Cached Mode they won't see new users or DL modifications in the GAL 0.094 seconds after they make the changes. Explaining how Exchange generates an OAB and Outlook downloads it once a day (unless configured differently) gets tiring. :)
  • Carol - we would absolutely love it if you emailed us your top 5 or 10 list of what you hear most commonly, and gave us an idea of how much time you spend resolving these issues.
  • Please, please don't forget we are not all running massive organisations with large support staffs and loads of scripting wizards.
    Don't forget either that SBS is very much tailored to the US market. SBS and does not work very well in Europe or for small businesses distributed around the world. Different countries => different legal systems  => multiple forests => NO SBS.
    So we are busy deploying Exchange on single servers.
    Don’t forget the users of your product who don't have any helpdesk software and cannot respond to this request.
    I’m not quite sure how I could participate, perhaps with an ongoing checklist of things I’m spending unnecessary time on, but you’d have to put up a website and allow a sort of round table-type input where we could add weight to existing issues and add new ones.