MicrosoftArpita Duppala thanks for the ACK, VERY much appreciated 
BUT sorry 
,
I again have to express my concern about the quality and embracement customers expect from Microsoft regarding products and services, and here I also think about Support which is getting worse and worse . . .
If I rewind to the time frame where Windows 2000 were released (Active Directory) and the accompanied Recourse Kit.
On the shelf it took almost 1,5 m and the technical details included here were amazing, we are a lot of "silverback's" that want this to reappear!
We miss the quality and the deep technical description, PLEASE bring it back, PLEASE!!!!!
Documentation here https://docs.microsoft.com/ is so superficial, that it is almost useless, sorry!
MarkRussinovich , we miss your whitepapers, deep dive on Windows, Case of the Unexplained, explanations of Scheduling algorithm on NUMA vs. non NUMA, etc.
I (Maybe I'm the lonely rider?) want the technical quality back as delivered in the Windows Internals classes and books, that you and David Solomon provided "PLEASE COME BACK" 
, , , , , , and show the way to describe things, so we, the customers, understands it and get the opportunity to get the best out of the technology the Microsoft provides.
Right now we are fighting to implement workarounds, waiting for the next release, that may (or may not) solve the issue.
Also deploying CU every month without description of all included fixes to e.g. AzHCI, how should we, the customers, be able to prove we have change management, we can't.
-Ib
