Security Review for Microsoft Edge version 138
We have reviewed the new settings in Microsoft Edge version 138 and determined that there are no additional security settings that require enforcement. The Microsoft Edge version 128 security baseline, which can be downloaded from the Microsoft Security Compliance Toolkit, continues to be our recommended configuration. Microsoft Edge version 138 introduces 6 new Computer and User settings and we have included a spreadsheet listing the new settings. There are two settings we would like to highlight for consideration as they enabling previewing behavior that will be enabled by default in a future release. Control whether TLS 1.3 Early Data is enabled in Microsoft Edge This setting allows enterprises to control whether the browser uses TLS 1.3 Early Data, a performance feature that sends HTTPS requests in parallel with the TLS handshake. This setting allows for faster use of secure connections. Enterprise customers are encouraged to test to identify any compatibility issues prior to the enablement. Specifies whether to block requests from public websites to devices on a user's local network This setting helps prevent malicious websites from probing or interacting with internal resources (i.e. printers, routers, or internal APIs), reducing the risk of lateral movement or data exposure. Enterprise customers are encouraged to test for any intentional requests from public to local devices. One thing to note on this policy setting is you may see a deprecation claim in the setting title. This was in error and will be corrected in a subsequent release. As a friendly reminder, all available settings for Microsoft Edge are documented here, and all available settings for Microsoft Edge Update are documented here. Please continue to give us feedback through the Security Baselines Discussion site or this post.Security baseline for Windows Server 2025, version 2506
Microsoft is pleased to announce the June 2025 revision of the security baseline package for Windows Server 2025 (v2506)! You can download the baseline package from the Microsoft Security Compliance Toolkit, test the recommended configurations in your environment, and customize / implement them as appropriate. Starting with this release, we plan to revise the Windows Server baseline more frequently to keep pace with evolving threats, new Windows features, and community feedback. Summary of Changes in This Release (v2506) This release includes several changes made since the last release of the security baseline for Windows Server 2025 in January 2025 to further assist in the security of enterprise customers along with better aligning with the latest standards. The changes include what is now depicted in the table below. Security Policy Change Summary Deny log on through Remote Desktop Services Allow remote logon for non-admin local accounts on MS and add “BUILTIN\Guests” to both DC and MS. WDigest Authentication Remove from the baseline Allow Windows Ink Workspace Remove from the baseline Audit Authorization Policy Change Set to “Success” in both DC and MS Include command line in process creation events Enable in both DC and MS Control whether exclusions are visible to local users Moved to Not Configured as it is overridden by the parent setting. Deny log on through Remote Desktop Services We updated SeDenyRemoteInteractiveLogonRight on member servers to use S-1-5-114 (Local account and member of Administrators group) instead of S-1-5-113 (all local accounts) to strike a better balance between security and operational flexibility. This change continues to block remote RDP access for high-risk local admin accounts—our primary threat vector—while enabling legitimate use cases for non-admin local accounts, such as remote troubleshooting and maintenance during failover or domain unavailability. By allowing non-admin local accounts to log on interactively, we preserve a secure recovery path without weakening protection for privileged accounts. In addition, to strengthen the Remote Desktop Services (RDS) posture on both Windows Server 2025 Domain Controllers and Member Servers, we added the Guests group to the "Deny log on through Remote Desktop Services" policy. While the Guest account is disabled by default, explicitly denying its RDP access adds a defense-in-depth measure that helps prevent misuse if the group is ever enabled or misconfigured. This complements the existing restriction on Local Account logon for DCs and helps ensure a consistent security posture across server roles. WDigest Authentication We removed the policy "WDigest Authentication (disabling may require KB2871997)" from the security baseline because it is no longer necessary for Windows Server 2025. This policy was originally enforced to prevent WDigest from storing users plaintext passwords in memory, which posed a serious credential theft risk. However, starting with 24H2 update (KB5041160) for Windows Server 2022 and continuing into Windows Server 2025, the engineering teams have deprecated this policy. As a result, there is no longer a need to explicitly enforce this setting, and the policy has been removed from the baseline to reflect the current default behavior. Allow Windows Ink Workspace We removed the policy “Allow Windows Ink Workspace” from the Windows Server 2025 security baseline. This policy applies only to Windows client editions and is not available on Windows Server. Including it in the baseline caused confusion removing an unnecessary setting from the baseline reduces GPO processing time and helps ensure all recommended settings are applicable for the Windows Server environment. Audit Authorization Policy Change We set Audit Authorization Policy Change (Success) on the baseline for both Domain Controllers and Member Servers to ensure visibility into any changes that affect the system’s security posture, including modifications to user rights and audit policies. These changes directly impact how access is granted and how activity is monitored, making them critical to detect for both security and compliance purposes. Logging successful changes helps identify misconfigurations, unauthorized privilege assignments, or malicious tampering — especially in cases of lateral movement or privilege escalation. Because these events occur infrequently, they generate minimal log volume while offering high forensic and operational value. While Failure auditing is not set, it is available as an optional setting on both Domain Controllers and Member Servers for organizations that have the monitoring capability to interpret and act on failed attempts to modify security policies. This provides an added layer of visibility in high-assurance or tightly controlled environments. Include command line in process creation events We added Include command line in process creation events in the baseline to improve visibility into how processes are executed across the system. Capturing command-line arguments allows defenders to detect and investigate malicious activity that may otherwise appear legitimate, such as abuse of scripting engines, credential theft tools, or obfuscated payloads using native binaries. This setting supports modern threat detection techniques with minimal performance overhead and is widely recommended. Visibility of Microsoft Defender Antivirus Exclusions We updated the configuration for the policy "Control whether exclusions are visible to local users" (Computer Configuration\Windows Components\Microsoft Defender Antivirus) to Not Configured in this release. This change was made because the parent policy "Control whether or not exclusions are visible to Local Admins" is already set to Enabled, which takes precedence and effectively overrides the behavior of the former setting. As a result, explicitly configuring the child policy is unnecessary and may introduce confusion without impacting actual behavior. You can continue to manage exclusion visibility through the parent policy, which provides the intended control over whether local administrators can view exclusion lists. UEFI Lock and Virtualization-Based Protections In Windows, some security features are protected by Secure Boot and the TPM. When combined with firmware protections that lock UEFI configuration variables, these protections become tamper-resistant: Windows can detect and respond to unauthorized hardware changes or tamper attempts, making it significantly harder for attackers to disable key security features after deployment. In the Windows Server 2025 security baseline, two policy categories are configured to take advantage of UEFI lock: Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) — managed via the policy: System\Device Guard\Turn On Virtualization Based Security Local Security Authority (LSA) Protection — managed via the policy: System\Local Security Authority\Configure LSASS to run as a protected process While there are no changes to the recommended settings for these policies in this release, we want to highlight their role in strengthening system defenses and provide guidance to help you make informed deployment decisions. UEFI lock enforces these protections in a way that prevents local or remote tampering—even by administrators. This aligns with strong security requirements in sensitive or high-assurance environments. However, it also introduces important operational considerations: Some hardware platforms may not fully support UEFI lock Compatibility issues, reduced performance, or system instability may occur Once enabled, UEFI lock is difficult to reverse Please let us know your thoughts by commenting on this post or through the Security Baseline Community.Security Review for Microsoft Edge version 137
We have reviewed the new settings in Microsoft Edge version 137 and determined that there are no additional security settings that require enforcement. The Microsoft Edge version 128 security baseline continues to be our recommended configuration which can be downloaded from the Microsoft Security Compliance Toolkit. Microsoft Edge version 137 introduced 5 new Computer and User settings, we have included a spreadsheet listing the new settings to make it easier for you to find. As a friendly reminder, all available settings for Microsoft Edge are documented here, and all available settings for Microsoft Edge Update are documented here. Please continue to give us feedback through the Security Baselines Discussion site or this post.Security Review for Microsoft Edge version 136
We are pleased to announce the security review for Microsoft Edge, version 136. We have reviewed the new settings in Microsoft Edge version 136 and determined that there are no additional security settings that require enforcement. The Microsoft Edge version 128 security baseline continues to be our recommended configuration which can be downloaded from the Microsoft Security Compliance Toolkit. Microsoft Edge version 136 introduced 4 new Computer and User settings, we have included a spreadsheet listing the new settings to make it easier for you to find. As a friendly reminder, all available settings for Microsoft Edge are documented here, and all available settings for Microsoft Edge Update are documented here. Please continue to give us feedback through the Security Baselines Discussion site or this post.Security Review for Microsoft Edge version 135
We are pleased to announce the security review for Microsoft Edge, version 135. We have reviewed the new settings in Microsoft Edge version 135 and determined that there are no additional security settings that require enforcement. The Microsoft Edge version 128 security baseline continues to be our recommended configuration which can be downloaded from the Microsoft Security Compliance Toolkit. Microsoft Edge version 135 introduced 5 new Computer and User settings, we have included a spreadsheet listing the new settings to make it easier for you to find. As a friendly reminder, all available settings for Microsoft Edge are documented here, and all available settings for Microsoft Edge Update are documented here. Please continue to give us feedback through the Security Baselines Discussion site or this post.Security Review for Microsoft Edge version 134
We have reviewed the new settings in Microsoft Edge version 134 and determined that there are no additional security settings that require enforcement. The Microsoft Edge version 128 security baseline continues to be our recommended configuration which can be downloaded from the Microsoft Security Compliance Toolkit. Microsoft Edge version 134 introduced 12 new Computer and User settings and we have included a spreadsheet listing the new settings to make it easier for you to find. There are however two settings we would like to highlight Configure Edge Scareware Blocker Protection This is an important new feature for combatting the most prevalent social-engineering attacks on the web. While we are not ready to enforce this setting yet, organizations should consider its impact and determine if it is right for their environments. In a future baseline, this will be set to a value of Enabled. Additional details can be found here. JavaScript optimization settings These v8 JavaScript engine policies (located under Microsoft Edge\Content settings) control whether Edge will perform JIT-compilation of JavaScript code on websites. Disabling JIT-compilation improves security against many memory-safety vulnerabilities but can slow website performance on script-heavy sites. These policies control only JavaScript compilation and do not impact Web Assembly (WASM) compilation, which remains enabled by default unless Edge’s Enhanced Security Mode (ESM) is in use. Disabling the optimizer disables the two JIT optimizing compilers (Maglev and Turbofan) but WASM can continue to use JIT compiler (LiftOff). The disablement of these two compilers reduces the browser’s attack surface significantly. These policies are an addition to the existing ESM policies. If the Enterprise has set the ESM policies, then ESM policy takes precedence over V8 optimizer disablement. As a friendly reminder, all available settings for Microsoft Edge are documented here, and all available settings for Microsoft Edge Update are documented here. Please continue to give us feedback through the Security Baselines Discussion site or this post.
