Continued Investment in Azure App Service
This blog was originally published to the App Service team blog Recent Investments Premium v4 (Pv4) Azure App Service Premium v4 delivers higher performance and scalability on newer Azure infrastructure while preserving the fully managed PaaS experience developers rely on. Premium v4 offers expanded CPU and memory options, improved price-performance, and continued support for App Service capabilities such as deployment slots, integrated monitoring, and availability zone resiliency. These improvements help teams modernize and scale demanding workloads without taking on additional operational complexity. App Service Managed Instance App Service Managed Instance extends the App Service model to support Windows web applications that require deeper environment control. It enables plan-level isolation, optional private networking, and operating system customization while retaining managed scaling, patching, identity, and diagnostics. Managed Instance is designed to reduce migration friction for existing applications, allowing teams to move to a modern PaaS environment without code changes. Faster Runtime and Language Support Azure App Service continues to invest in keeping pace with modern application stacks. Regular updates across .NET, Node.js, Python, Java, and PHP help developers adopt new language versions and runtime improvements without managing underlying infrastructure. Reliability and Availability Improvements Ongoing investments in platform reliability and resiliency strengthen production confidence. Expanded Availability Zone support and related infrastructure improvements help applications achieve higher availability with more flexible configuration options as workloads scale. Deployment Workflow Enhancements Deployment workflows across Azure App Service continue to evolve, with ongoing improvements to GitHub Actions, Azure DevOps, and platform tooling. These enhancements reduce friction from build to production while preserving the managed App Service experience. A Platform That Grows With You These recent investments reflect a consistent direction for Azure App Service: active development focused on performance, reliability, and developer productivity. Improvements to runtimes, infrastructure, availability, and deployment workflows are designed to work together, so applications benefit from platform progress without needing to re-architect or change operating models. The recent General Availability of Aspire on Azure App Service is another example of this direction. Developers building distributed .NET applications can now use the Aspire AppHost model to define, orchestrate, and deploy their services directly to App Service — bringing a code-first development experience to a fully managed platform. We are also seeing many customers build and run AI-powered applications on Azure App Service, integrating models, agents, and intelligent features directly into their web apps and APIs. App Service continues to evolve to support these scenarios, providing a managed, scalable foundation that works seamlessly with Azure's broader AI services and tooling. Whether you are modernizing with Premium v4, migrating existing workloads using App Service Managed Instance, or running production applications at scale - including AI-enabled workloads - Azure App Service provides a predictable and transparent foundation that evolves alongside your applications. Azure App Service continues to focus on long-term value through sustained investment in a managed platform developers can rely on as requirements grow, change, and increasingly incorporate AI. Get Started Ready to build on Azure App Service? Here are some resources to help you get started: Create your first web app — Deploy a web app in minutes using the Azure portal, CLI, or VS Code. App Service documentation — Explore guides, tutorials, and reference for the full platform. Aspire on Azure App Service — Now generally available. Deploy distributed .NET applications to App Service using the Aspire AppHost model. Pricing and plans — Compare tiers including Premium v4 and find the right fit for your workload. App Service on Azure Architecture Center — Reference architectures and best practices for production deployments.Beyond the Desktop: The Future of Development with Microsoft Dev Box and GitHub Codespaces
The modern developer platform has already moved past the desktop. We’re no longer defined by what’s installed on our laptops, instead we look at what tooling we can use to move from idea to production. An organisations developer platform strategy is no longer a nice to have, it sets the ceiling for what’s possible, an organisation can’t iterate it's way to developer nirvana if the foundation itself is brittle. A great developer platform shrinks TTFC (time to first commit), accelerates release velocity, and maybe most importantly, helps alleviate everyday frictions that lead to developer burnout. Very few platforms deliver everything an organization needs from a developer platform in one product. Modern development spans multiple dimensions, local tooling, cloud infrastructure, compliance, security, cross-platform builds, collaboration, and rapid onboarding. The options organizations face are then to either compromise on one or more of these areas or force developers into rigid environments that slow productivity and innovation. This is where Microsoft Dev Box and GitHub Codespaces come into play. On their own, each addresses critical parts of the modern developer platform: Microsoft Dev Box provides a full, managed cloud workstation. Dev Box gives developers a consistent, high-performance environment while letting central IT apply strict governance and control. Internally at Microsoft, we estimate that usage of Dev Box by our development teams delivers savings of 156 hours per year per developer purely on local environment setup and upkeep. We have also seen significant gains in other key SPACE metrics reducing context-switching friction and improving build/test cycles. Although the benefits of Dev Box are clear in the results demonstrated by our customers it is not without its challenges. The biggest challenge often faced by Dev Box customers is its lack of native Linux support. At the time of writing and for the foreseeable future Dev Box does not support native Linux developer workstations. While WSL2 provides partial parity, I know from my own engineering projects it still does not deliver the full experience. This is where GitHub Codespaces comes into this story. GitHub Codespaces delivers instant, Linux-native environments spun up directly from your repository. It’s lightweight, reproducible, and ephemeral ideal for rapid iteration, PR testing, and cross-platform development where you need Linux parity or containerized workflows. Unlike Dev Box, Codespaces can run fully in Linux, giving developers access to native tools, scripts, and runtimes without workarounds. It also removes much of the friction around onboarding: a new developer can open a repository and be coding in minutes, with the exact environment defined by the project’s devcontainer.json. That said, Codespaces isn’t a complete replacement for a full workstation. While it’s perfect for isolated project work or ephemeral testing, it doesn’t provide the persistent, policy-controlled environment that enterprise teams often require for heavier workloads or complex toolchains. Used together, they fill the gaps that neither can cover alone: Dev Box gives the enterprise-grade foundation, while Codespaces provides the agile, cross-platform sandbox. For organizations, this pairing sets a higher ceiling for developer productivity, delivering a truly hybrid, agile and well governed developer platform. Better Together: Dev Box and GitHub Codespaces in action Together, Microsoft Dev Box and GitHub Codespaces deliver a hybrid developer platform that combines consistency, speed, and flexibility. Teams can spin up full, policy-compliant Dev Box workstations preloaded with enterprise tooling, IDEs, and local testing infrastructure, while Codespaces provides ephemeral, Linux-native environments tailored to each project. One of my favourite use cases is having local testing setups like a Docker Swarm cluster, ready to go in either Dev Box or Codespaces. New developers can jump in and start running services or testing microservices immediately, without spending hours on environment setup. Anecdotally, my time to first commit and time to delivering “impact” has been significantly faster on projects where one or both technologies provide local development services out of the box. Switching between Dev Boxes and Codespaces is seamless every environment keeps its own libraries, extensions, and settings intact, so developers can jump between projects without reconfiguring or breaking dependencies. The result is a turnkey, ready-to-code experience that maximizes productivity, reduces friction, and lets teams focus entirely on building, testing, and shipping software. To showcase this value, I thought I would walk through an example scenario. In this scenario I want to simulate a typical modern developer workflow. Let's look at a day in the life of a developer on this hybrid platform building an IOT project using Python and React. Spin up a ready-to-go workstation (Dev Box) for Windows development and heavy builds. Launch a Linux-native Codespace for cross-platform services, ephemeral testing, and PR work. Run "local" testing like a Docker Swarm cluster, database, and message queue ready to go out-of-the-box. Switch seamlessly between environments without losing project-specific configurations, libraries, or extensions. 9:00 AM – Morning Kickoff on Dev Box I start my day on my Microsoft Dev Box, which gives me a fully-configured Windows environment with VS Code, design tools, and Azure integrations. I select my teams project, and the environment is pre-configured for me through the Dev Box catalogue. Fortunately for me, its already provisioned. I could always self service another one using the "New Dev Box" button if I wanted too. I'll connect through the browser but I could use the desktop app too if I wanted to. My Tasks are: Prototype a new dashboard widget for monitoring IoT device temperature. Use GUI-based tools to tweak the UI and preview changes live. Review my Visio Architecture. Join my morning stand up. Write documentation notes and plan API interactions for the backend. In a flash, I have access to my modern work tooling like Teams, I have this projects files already preloaded and all my peripherals are working without additional setup. Only down side was that I did seem to be the only person on my stand up this morning? Why Dev Box first: GUI-heavy tasks are fast and responsive. Dev Box’s environment allows me to use a full desktop. Great for early-stage design, planning, and visual work. Enterprise Apps are ready for me to use out of the box (P.S. It also supports my multi-monitor setup). I use my Dev Box to make a very complicated change to my IoT dashboard. Changing the title from "IoT Dashboard" to "Owain's IoT Dashboard". I preview this change in a browser live. (Time for a coffee after this hardwork). The rest of the dashboard isnt loading as my backend isnt running... yet. 10:30 AM – Switching to Linux Codespaces Once the UI is ready, I push the code to GitHub and spin up a Linux-native GitHub Codespace for backend development. Tasks: Implement FastAPI endpoints to support the new IoT feature. Run the service on my Codespace and debug any errors. Why Codespaces now: Linux-native tools ensure compatibility with the production server. Docker and containerized testing run natively, avoiding WSL translation overhead. The environment is fully reproducible across any device I log in from. 12:30 PM – Midday Testing & Sync I toggle between Dev Box and Codespaces to test and validate the integration. I do this in my Dev Box Edge browser viewing my codespace (I use my Codespace in a browser through this demo to highlight the difference in environments. In reality I would leverage the VSCode "Remote Explorer" extension and its GitHub Codespace integration to use my Codespace from within my own desktop VSCode but that is personal preference) and I use the same browser to view my frontend preview. I update the environment variable for my frontend that is running locally in my Dev Box and point it at the port running my API locally on my Codespace. In this case it was a web socket connection and HTTPS calls to port 8000. I can make this public by changing the port visibility in my Codespace. https://fluffy-invention-5x5wp656g4xcp6x9-8000.app.github.dev/api/devices wss://fluffy-invention-5x5wp656g4xcp6x9-8000.app.github.dev/ws This allows me to: Preview the frontend widget on Dev Box, connecting to the backend running in Codespaces. Make small frontend adjustments in Dev Box while monitoring backend logs in Codespaces. Commit changes to GitHub, keeping both environments in sync and leveraging my CI/CD for deployment to the next environment. We can see the Dev Box running local frontend and the Codespace running the API connected to each other, making requests and displaying the data in the frontend! Hybrid advantage: Dev Box handles GUI previews comfortably and allows me to live test frontend changes. Codespaces handles production-aligned backend testing and Linux-native tools. Dev Box allows me to view all of my files in one screen with potentially multiple Codespaces running in browser of VS Code Desktop. Due to all of those platform efficiencies I have completed my days goals within an hour or two and now I can spend the rest of my day learning about how to enable my developers to inner source using GitHub CoPilot and MCP (Shameless plug). The bottom line There are some additional considerations when architecting a developer platform for an enterprise such as private networking and security not covered in this post but these are implementation details to deliver the described developer experience. Architecting such a platform is a valuable investment to deliver the developer platform foundations we discussed at the top of the article. While in this demo I have quickly built I was working in a mono repository in real engineering teams it is likely (I hope) that an application is built of many different repositories. The great thing about Dev Box and Codespaces is that this wouldn’t slow down the rapid development I can achieve when using both. My Dev Box would be specific for the project or development team, pre loaded with all the tools I need and potentially some repos too! When I need too I can quickly switch over to Codespaces and work in a clean isolated environment and push my changes. In both cases any changes I want to deliver locally are pushed into GitHub (Or ADO), merged and my CI/CD ensures that my next step, potentially a staging environment or who knows perhaps *Whispering* straight into production is taken care of. Once I’m finished I delete my Codespace and potentially my Dev Box if I am done with the project, knowing I can self service either one of these anytime and be up and running again! Now is there overlap in terms of what can be developed in a Codespace vs what can be developed in Azure Dev Box? Of course, but as organisations prioritise developer experience to ensure release velocity while maintaining organisational standards and governance then providing developers a windows native and Linux native service both of which are primarily charged on the consumption of the compute* is a no brainer. There are also gaps that neither fill at the moment for example Microsoft Dev Box only provides windows compute while GitHub Codespaces only supports VS Code as your chosen IDE. It's not a question of which service do I choose for my developers, these two services are better together! *Changes have been announced to Dev Box pricing. A W365 license is already required today and dev boxes will continue to be managed through Azure. For more information please see: Microsoft Dev Box capabilities are coming to Windows 365 - Microsoft Dev Box | Microsoft Learn
Unlocking Application Modernisation with GitHub Copilot
AI-driven modernisation is unlocking new opportunities you may not have even considered yet. It's also allowing organisations to re-evaluate previously discarded modernisation attempts that were considered too hard, complex or simply didn't have the skills or time to do. During Microsoft Build 2025, we were introduced to the concept of Agentic AI modernisation and this post from Ikenna Okeke does a great job of summarising the topic - Reimagining App Modernisation for the Era of AI | Microsoft Community Hub. This blog post however, explores the modernisation opportunities that you may not even have thought of yet, the business benefits, how to start preparing your organisation, empowering your teams, and identifying where GitHub Copilot can help. I’ve spent the last 8 months working with customers exploring usage of GitHub Copilot, and want to share what my team members and I have discovered in terms of new opportunities to modernise, transform your applications, bringing some fun back into those migrations! Let’s delve into how GitHub Copilot is helping teams update old systems, move processes to the cloud, and achieve results faster than ever before. Background: The Modernisation Challenge (Then vs Now) Modernising legacy software has always been hard. In the past, teams faced steep challenges: brittle codebases full of technical debt, outdated languages (think decades-old COBOL or VB6), sparse documentation, and original developers long gone. Integrating old systems with modern cloud services often requiring specialised skills that were in short supply – for example, check out this fantastic post from Arvi LiVigni (@arilivigni ) which talks about migrating from COBOL “the number of developers who can read and write COBOL isn’t what it used to be,” making those systems much harder to update". Common pain points included compatibility issues, data migrations, high costs, security vulnerabilities, and the constant risk that any change could break critical business functions. It’s no wonder many modernisation projects stalled or were “put off” due to their complexity and risk. So, what’s different now (circa 2025) compared to two years ago? In a word: Intelligent AI assistance. Tools like GitHub Copilot have emerged as AI pair programmers that dramatically lower the barriers to modernisation. Arvi’s post talks about how only a couple of years ago, developers had to comb through documentation and Stack Overflow for clues when deciphering old code or upgrading frameworks. Today, GitHub Copilot can act like an expert co-developer inside your IDE, ready to explain mysterious code, suggest updates, and even rewrite legacy code in modern languages. This means less time fighting old code and more time implementing improvements. As Arvi says “nine times out of 10 it gives me the right answer… That speed – and not having to break out of my flow – is really what’s so impactful.” In short, AI coding assistants have evolved from novel experiments to indispensable tools, reimagining how we approach software updates and cloud adoption. I’d also add from my own experience – the models we were using 12 months ago have already been superseded by far superior models with ability to ingest larger context and tackle even further complexity. It's easier to experiment, and fail, bringing more robust outcomes – with such speed to create those proof of concepts, experimentation and failing faster, this has also unlocked the ability to test out multiple hypothesis’ and get you to the most confident outcome in a much shorter space of time. Modernisation is easier now because AI reduces the heavy lifting. Instead of reading the 10,000-line legacy program alone, a developer can ask Copilot to explain what the code does or even propose a refactored version. Rather than manually researching how to replace an outdated library, they can get instant recommendations for modern equivalents. These advancements mean that tasks which once took weeks or months can now be done in days or hours – with more confidence and less drudgery - more fun! The following sections will dive into specific opportunities unlocked by GitHub Copilot across the modernisation journey which you may not even have thought of. Modernisation Opportunities Unlocked by Copilot Modernising an application isn’t just about updating code – it involves bringing everyone and everything up to speed with cloud-era practices. Below are several scenarios and how GitHub Copilot adds value, with the specific benefits highlighted: 1. AI-Assisted Legacy Code Refactoring and Upgrades Instant Code Comprehension: GitHub Copilot can explain complex legacy code in plain English, helping developers quickly understand decades-old logic without scouring scarce documentation. For example, you can highlight a cryptic COBOL or C++ function and ask Copilot to describe what it does – an invaluable first step before making any changes. This saves hours and reduces errors when starting a modernisation effort. Automated Refactoring Suggestions: The AI suggests modern replacements for outdated patterns and APIs, and can even translate code between languages. For instance, Copilot can help convert a COBOL program into JavaScript or C# by recognising equivalent constructs. It also uses transformation tools (like OpenRewrite for Java/.NET) to systematically apply code updates – e.g. replacing all legacy HTTP calls with a modern library in one sweep. Developers remain in control, but GitHub Copilot handles the tedious bulk edits. Bulk Code Upgrades with AI: GitHub Copilot’s App Modernisation capabilities can analyse an entire codebase and generate a detailed upgrade plan, then execute many of the code changes automatically. It can upgrade framework versions (say from .NET Framework 4.x to .NET 6, or Java 8 to Java 17) by applying known fix patterns and even fixing compilation errors after the upgrade. Teams can finally tackle those hundreds of thousand-line enterprise applications – a task that could take multiple years with GitHub Copilot handling the repetitive changes. Technical Debt Reduction: By cleaning up old code and enforcing modern best practices, GitHub Copilot helps chip away at years of technical debt. The modernised codebase is more maintainable and stable, which lowers the long-term risk hanging over critical business systems. Notably, the tool can even scan for known security vulnerabilities during refactoring as it updates your code. In short, each legacy component refreshed with GitHub Copilot comes out safer and easier to work on, instead of remaining a brittle black box. 2. Accelerating Cloud Migration and Azure Modernisation Guided Azure Migration Planning: GitHub Copilot can assess a legacy application’s cloud readiness and recommend target Azure services for each component. For instance, it might suggest migrating an on-premises database to Azure SQL, moving file storage to Azure Blob Storage, and converting background jobs to Azure Functions. This provides a clear blueprint to confidently move an app from servers to Azure PaaS. One-Click Cloud Transformations: GitHub Copilot comes with predefined migration tasksthat automate the code changes required for cloud adoption. With one click, you can have the AI apply dozens of modifications across your codebase. For example: File storage: Replace local file read/writes with Azure Blob Storage SDK calls. Email/Comms: Swap out SMTP email code for Azure Communication Services or SendGrid. Identity: Migrate authentication from Windows AD to Azure AD (Entra ID) libraries. Configuration: Remove hard-coded configurations and use Azure App Configuration or Key Vault for secrets. GitHub Copilot performs these transformations consistently, following best practices (like using connection strings from Azure settings). After applying the changes, it even fixes any compile errors automatically, so you’re not left with broken builds. What used to require reading countless Azure migration guides is now handled in minutes. Automated Validation & Deployment: Modernisation doesn’t stop at code changes. GitHub Copilot can also generate unit tests to validate that the application still behaves correctly after the migration. It helps ensure that your modernised, cloud-ready app passes all its checks before going live. When you’re ready to deploy, GitHub Copilot can produce the necessary Infrastructure-as-Code templates (e.g. Azure Resource Manager Bicep files or Terraform configs) and even set up CI/CD pipeline scripts for you. In other words, the AI can configure the Azure environment and deployment process end-to-end. This dramatically reduces manual effort and error, getting your app to the cloud faster and with greater confidence. Integrations: GitHub Copilot also helps tackle larger migration scenarios that were previously considered too complex. For example, many enterprises want to retire expensive proprietary integration platforms like MuleSoft or Apigee and use Azure-native services instead, but rewriting hundreds of integration workflows was daunting. Now, GitHub Copilot can assist in translating those workflows: for instance, converting an Apigee API proxy into an Azure API Management policy, or a MuleSoft integration into an Azure Logic App. Multi-Cloud Migrations: if you plan to consolidate from other clouds into Azure, GitHub Copilot can suggest equivalent Azure services and SDK calls to replace AWS or GCP-specific code. These AI-assisted conversions significantly cut down the time needed to reimplement functionality on Azure. The business impact can be substantial. By lowering the effort of such migrations, GitHub Copilot makes it feasible to pursue opportunities that deliver big cost savings and simplification. 3. Boosting Developer Productivity and Quality Instant Unit Tests (TDD Made Easy): Writing tests for old code can be tedious, but GitHub Copilot can generate unit test cases on the fly. Developers can highlight an existing function and ask Copilot to create tests; it will produce meaningful test methods covering typical and edge scenarios. This makes it practical to apply test-driven development practices even to legacy systems – you can quickly build a safety net of tests before refactoring. By catching bugs early through these AI-generated tests, teams gain confidence to modernise code without breaking things. It essentially injects quality into the process from the start, which is crucial for successful modernisation. DevOps Automation: GitHub Copilot helps modernise your build and deployment process as well. It can draft CI/CD pipeline configurations, Dockerfiles, Kubernetes manifests, and other DevOps scripts by leveraging its knowledge of common patterns. For example, when setting up a GitHub Actions workflow to deploy your app, GitHub Copilot will autocomplete significant parts (like build steps, test runs, deployment jobs) based on the project structure. This not only saves time but also ensures best practices (proper caching, dependency installation, etc.) are followed by default. Microsoft even provides an extension where you can describe your Azure infrastructure needs in plain language and have GitHub Copilot generate the corresponding templates and pipeline YAML. By automating these pieces, teams can move to cloud-based, automated deployments much faster. Behaviour-Driven Development Support: Teams practicing BDD write human-readable scenarios (e.g. using Gherkin syntax) describing application behaviour. GitHub Copilot’s AI is adept at interpreting such descriptions and suggesting step definition code or test implementations to match. For instance, given a scenario “When a user with no items checks out, then an error message is shown,” GitHub Copilot can draft the code for that condition or the test steps required. This helps bridge the gap between non-technical specifications and actual code. It makes BDD more efficient and accessible, because even if team members aren’t strong coders, the AI can translate their intent into working code that developers can refine. Quality and Consistency: By using AI to handle boilerplate and repetitive tasks, developers can focus more on high-value improvements. GitHub Copilot’s suggestions are based on a vast corpus of code, which often means it surfaces well-structured, idiomatic patterns. Starting from these suggestions, developers are less likely to introduce errors or reinvent the wheel, which leads to more consistent code quality across the project. The AI also often reminds you of edge cases (for example, suggesting input validation or error handling code that might be missed), contributing to a more robust application. In practice, many teams find that adopting GitHub Copilot results in fewer bugs and quicker code reviews, as the code is cleaner on the first pass. It’s like having an extra set of eyes on every pull request, ensuring standards are met. Business Benefits of AI-Powered Modernisation Bringing together the technical advantages above, what’s the payoff for the business and stakeholders? Modernising with GitHub Copilot can yield multiple tangible and intangible benefits: Accelerated Time-to-Market: Modernisation projects that might have taken a year can potentially be completed in a few months, or an upgrade that took weeks can be done in days. This speed means you can deliver new features to customers sooner and respond faster to market changes. It also reduces downtime or disruption since migrations happen more swiftly. Cost Savings: By automating repetitive work and reducing the effort required from highly paid senior engineers, GitHub Copilot can trim development costs. Faster project completion also means lower overall project cost. Additionally, running modernised apps on cloud infrastructure (with updated code) often lowers operational costs due to more efficient resource usage and easier maintenance. There’s also an opportunity cost benefit: developers freed up by Copilot can work on other value-adding projects in parallel. Improved Quality & Reliability: GitHub Copilot’s contributions to testing, bug-fixing, and even security (like patching known vulnerabilities during upgrades) result in more robust applications. Modernised systems have fewer outages and security incidents than shaky legacy ones. Stakeholders will appreciate that with GitHub Copilot, modernisation doesn’t mean “trading one set of bugs for another” – instead, you can increase quality as you modernise (GitHub’s research noted higher code quality when using Copilot, as developers are less likely to introduce errors or skip tests). Business Agility: A modernised application (especially one refactored for cloud) is typically more scalable and adaptable. New integrations or features can be added much faster once the platform is up-to-date. GitHub Copilot helps clear the modernisation hurdle, after which the business can innovate on a solid, flexible foundation (for example, once a monolith is broken into microservices or moved to Azure PaaS, you can iterate on it much faster in the future). AI-assisted modernisation thus unlocks future opportunities (like easier expansion, integrations, AI features, etc.) that were impractical on the legacy stack. Employee Satisfaction and Innovation: Developer happiness is a subtle but important benefit. When tedious work is handled by AI, developers can spend more time on creative tasks – designing new features, improving user experience, exploring new technologies. This can foster a culture of innovation. Moreover, being seen as a company that leverages modern tools (like AI Copilot) helps attract and retain top tech talent. Teams that successfully modernise critical systems with Copilot will gain confidence to tackle other ambitious projects, creating a positive feedback loop of improvement. To sum up, GitHub Copilot acts as a force-multiplier for application modernisation. It enables organisations to do more with less: convert legacy “boat anchors” into modern, cloud-enabled assets rapidly, while improving quality and developer morale. This aligns IT goals with business goals – faster delivery, greater efficiency, and readiness for the future. Call to Action: Embrace the Future of Modernisation GitHub Copilot has proven to be a catalyst for transforming how we approach legacy systems and cloud adoption. If you’re excited about the possibilities, here are next steps and what to watch for: Start Experimenting: If you haven’t already, try GitHub Copilot on a sample of your code. Use Copilot or Copilot Chat to explain a piece of old code or generate a unit test. Seeing it in action on your own project can build confidence and spark ideas for where to apply it. Identify a Pilot Project: Look at your application portfolio for a candidate that’s ripe for modernisation – maybe a small legacy service that could be moved to Azure, or a module that needs a refactor. Use GitHub Copilot to assess and estimate the effort. Often, you’ll find tasks once deemed “too hard” might now be feasible. Early successes will help win support for larger initiatives. Stay Tuned for Our Upcoming Blog Series: This post is just the beginning. In forthcoming posts, we’ll dive deeper into: Setting Up Your Organisation for Copilot Adoption: Practical tips on preparing your enterprise environment – from licensing and security considerations to training programs. We’ll discuss best practices (like running internal awareness campaigns, defining success metrics, and creating Copilot champions in your teams) to ensure a smooth rollout. Empowering Your Colleagues: How to foster a culture that embraces AI assistance. This includes enabling continuous learning, sharing prompt techniques and knowledge bases, and addressing any scepticism. We’ll cover strategies to support developers in using Copilot effectively, so that everyone from new hires to veteran engineers can amplify their productivity. Identifying High-Impact Modernisation Areas: Guidance on spotting where GitHub Copilot can add the most value. We’ll look at different domains – code, cloud, tests, data – and how to evaluate opportunities (for example, using telemetry or feedback to find repetitive tasks suited for AI, or legacy components with high ROI if modernised). Engage and Share: As you start leveraging Copilot for modernisation, share your experiences and results. Success stories (even small wins like “GitHub Copilot helped reduce our code review times” or “we migrated a component to Azure in 1 sprint”) can build momentum within your organisation and the broader community. We invite you to discuss and ask questions in the comments or in our tech community forums. Take a look at the new App Modernisation Guidance—a comprehensive, step-by-step playbook designed to help organisations: Understand what to modernise and why Migrate and rebuild apps with AI-first design Continuously optimise with built-in governance and observability Modernisation is a journey, and AI is the new compass and Copilot to guide the way. By embracing tools like GitHub Copilot, you position your organisation to break through modernisation barriers that once seemed insurmountable. The result is not just updated software, but a more agile, cloud-ready business and a happier, more productive development team. Now is the time to take that step. Empower your team with Copilot, and unlock the full potential of your applications and your developers. Stay tuned for more insights in our next posts, and let’s modernise what’s possible together!Search Less, Build More: Inner Sourcing with GitHub Copilot and ADO MCP Server
Developers burn cycles context‑switching: opening five repos to find a logging example, searching a wiki for a data masking rule, scrolling chat history for the latest pipeline pattern. Organisations that I speak to are often on the path of transformational platform engineering projects but always have the fear or doubt of "what if my engineers don't use these resources". While projects like Backstage still play a pivotal role in inner sourcing and discoverability I also empathise with developers who would argue "How would I even know in the first place, which modules have or haven't been created for reuse". In this blog we explore how we can ensure organisational standards and developer satisfaction without any heavy lifting on either side, no custom model training, no rewriting or relocating of repositories and no stagnant local data. Using GitHub Copilot + Azure DevOps MCP server (with the free `code_search` extension) we turn the IDE into an organizational knowledge interface. Instead of guessing or re‑implementing, engineers can start scaffolding projects or solving issues as they would normally (hopefully using Copilot) and without extra prompting. GitHub Copilot can lean into organisational standards and ensure recommendations are made with code snippets directly generated from existing examples. What Is the Azure DevOps MCP Server + code_search Extension? MCP (Model Context Protocol) is an open standard that lets agents (like GitHub Copilot) pull in structured, on-demand context from external systems. MCP servers contain natural language explanations of the tools that the agent can utilise allowing dynamic decision making of when to implement certain toolsets over others. The Azure DevOps MCP Server is the ADO Product Team's implementation of that standard. It exposes your ADO environment in a way Copilot can consume. Out of the box it gives you access to: Projects – list and navigate across projects in your organization. Repositories – browse repos, branches, and files. Work items – surface user stories, bugs, or acceptance criteria. Wiki's – pull policies, standards, and documentation. This means Copilot can ground its answers in live ADO content, instead of hallucinating or relying only on what’s in the current editor window. The ADO server runs locally from your own machine to ensure that all sensitive project information remains within your secure network boundary. This also means that existing permissions on ADO objects such as Projects or Repositories are respected. Wiki search tooling available out of the box with ADO MCP server is very useful however if I am honest I have seen these wiki's go unused with documentation being stored elsewhere either inside the repository or in a project management tool. This means any tool that needs to implement code requires the ability to accurately search the code stored in the repositories themself. That is where the code_search extension enablement in ADO is so important. Most organisations have this enabled already however it is worth noting that this pre-requisite is the real unlock of cross-repo search. This allows for Copilot to: Query for symbols, snippets, or keywords across all repos. Retrieve usage examples from code, not just docs. Locate standards (like logging wrappers or retry policies) wherever they live. Back every recommendation with specific source lines. In short: MCP connects Copilot to Azure DevOps. code_search makes that connection powerful by turning it into a discovery engine. What is the relevance of Copilot Instructions? One of the less obvious but most powerful features of GitHub Copilot is its ability to follow instructions files. Copilot automatically looks for these files and uses them as a “playbook” for how it should behave. There are different types of instructions you can provide: Organisational instructions – apply across your entire workspace, regardless of which repo you’re in. Repo-specific instructions – scoped to a particular repository, useful when one project has unique standards or patterns. Personal instructions – smaller overrides layered on top of global rules when a local exception applies. (Stored in .github/copilot-instructions.md) In this solution, I’m using a single personal instructions file. It tells Copilot: When to search (e.g., always query repos and wikis before answering a standards question). Where to look (Azure DevOps repos, wikis, and with code_search, the code itself). How to answer (responses must cite the repo/file/line or wiki page; if no source is found, say so). How to resolve conflicts (prefer dated wiki entries over older README fragments). As a small example, a section of a Copilot instruction file could look like this: # GitHub Copilot Instructions for Azure DevOps MCP Integration This project uses Azure DevOps with MCP server integration to provide organizational context awareness. Always check to see if the Azure DevOps MCP server has a tool relevant to the user's request. ## Core Principles ### 1. Azure DevOps Integration - **Always prioritize Azure DevOps MCP tools** when users ask about: - Work items, stories, bugs, tasks - Pull requests and code reviews - Build pipelines and deployments - Repository operations and branch management - Wiki pages and documentation - Test plans and test cases - Project and team information ### 2. Organizational Context Awareness - Before suggesting solutions, **check existing organizational patterns** by: - Searching code across repositories for similar implementations - Referencing established coding standards and frameworks - Looking for existing shared libraries and utilities - Checking architectural decision records (ADRs) in wikis ### 3. Cross-Repository Intelligence - When providing code suggestions: - **Search for existing patterns** in other repositories first - **Reference shared libraries** and common utilities - **Maintain consistency** with organizational standards - **Suggest reusable components** when appropriate ## Tool Usage Guidelines ### Work Items and Project Management When users mention bugs, features, tasks, or project planning: ``` ✅ Use: wit_my_work_items, wit_create_work_item, wit_update_work_item ✅ Use: wit_list_backlogs, wit_get_work_items_for_iteration ✅ Use: work_list_team_iterations, core_list_projects The result... To test this I created 3 ADO Projects each with between 1-2 repositories. The repositories were light with only ReadMe's inside containing descriptions of the "repo" and some code snippets examples for usage. I have then created a brand-new workspace with no context apart from a Copilot instructions document (which could be part of a repo scaffold or organisation wide) which tells Copilot to search code and the wikis across all ADO projects in my demo environment. It returns guidance and standards from all available repo's and starts to use it to formulate its response. In the screenshot I have highlighted some key parts with red boxes. The first being a section of the readme that Copilot has identified in its response, that part also highlighted within CoPilot chat response. I have highlighted the rather generic prompt I used to get this response at the bottom of that window too. Above I have highlighted Copilot using the MCP server tooling searching through projects, repo's and code. Finally the largest box highlights the instructions given to Copilot on how to search and how easily these could be optimised or changed depending on the requirements and organisational coding standards. How did I implement this? Implementation is actually incredibly simple. As mentioned I created multiple projects and repositories within my ADO Organisation in order to test cross-project & cross-repo discovery. I then did the following: Enable code_search - in your Azure DevOps organization (Marketplace → install extension). Login to Azure - Use the AZ CLI to authenticate to Azure with "az login". Create vscode/mcp.json file - Snippet is provided below, the organisation name should be changed to your organisations name. Start and enable your MCP server - In the mcp.json file you should see a "Start" button. Using the snippet below you will be prompted to add your organisation name. Ensure your Copilot agent has access to the server under "tools" too. View this setup guide for full setup instructions (azure-devops-mcp/docs/GETTINGSTARTED.md at main · microsoft/azure-devops-mcp) Create a Copilot Instructions file - with a search-first directive. I have inserted the full version used in this demo at the bottom of the article. Experiment with Prompts – Start generic (“How do we secure APIs?”). Review the output and tools used and then tailor your instructions. Considerations While this is a great approach I do still have some considerations when going to production. Latency - Using MCP tooling on every request will add some latency to developer requests. We can look at optimizing usage through copilot instructions to better identify when Copilot should or shouldn't use the ADO MCP server. Complex Projects and Repositories - While I have demonstrated cross project and cross repository retrieval my demo environment does not truly simulate an enterprise ADO environment. Performance should be tested and closely monitored as organisational complexity increases. Public Preview - The ADO MCP server is moving quickly but is currently still public preview. We have demonstrated in this article how quickly we can make our Azure DevOps content discoverable. While their are considerations moving forward this showcases a direction towards agentic inner sourcing. Feel free to comment below how you think this approach could be extended or augmented for other use cases! Resources MCP Server Config (/.vscode/mcp.json) { "inputs": [ { "id": "ado_org", "type": "promptString", "description": "Azure DevOps organization name (e.g. 'contoso')" } ], "servers": { "ado": { "type": "stdio", "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@azure-devops/mcp", "${input:ado_org}"] } } } Copilot Instructions (/.github/copilot-instructions.md) # GitHub Copilot Instructions for Azure DevOps MCP Integration This project uses Azure DevOps with MCP server integration to provide organizational context awareness. Always check to see if the Azure DevOps MCP server has a tool relevant to the user's request. ## Core Principles ### 1. Azure DevOps Integration - **Always prioritize Azure DevOps MCP tools** when users ask about: - Work items, stories, bugs, tasks - Pull requests and code reviews - Build pipelines and deployments - Repository operations and branch management - Wiki pages and documentation - Test plans and test cases - Project and team information ### 2. Organizational Context Awareness - Before suggesting solutions, **check existing organizational patterns** by: - Searching code across repositories for similar implementations - Referencing established coding standards and frameworks - Looking for existing shared libraries and utilities - Checking architectural decision records (ADRs) in wikis ### 3. Cross-Repository Intelligence - When providing code suggestions: - **Search for existing patterns** in other repositories first - **Reference shared libraries** and common utilities - **Maintain consistency** with organizational standards - **Suggest reusable components** when appropriate ## Tool Usage Guidelines ### Work Items and Project Management When users mention bugs, features, tasks, or project planning: ``` ✅ Use: wit_my_work_items, wit_create_work_item, wit_update_work_item ✅ Use: wit_list_backlogs, wit_get_work_items_for_iteration ✅ Use: work_list_team_iterations, core_list_projects ``` ### Code and Repository Operations When users ask about code, branches, or pull requests: ``` ✅ Use: repo_list_repos_by_project, repo_list_pull_requests_by_repo ✅ Use: repo_list_branches_by_repo, repo_search_commits ✅ Use: search_code for finding patterns across repositories ``` ### Documentation and Knowledge Sharing When users need documentation or want to create/update docs: ``` ✅ Use: wiki_list_wikis, wiki_get_page_content, wiki_create_or_update_page ✅ Use: search_wiki for finding existing documentation ``` ### Build and Deployment When users ask about builds, deployments, or CI/CD: ``` ✅ Use: pipelines_get_builds, pipelines_get_build_definitions ✅ Use: pipelines_run_pipeline, pipelines_get_build_status ``` ## Response Patterns ### 1. Discovery First Before providing solutions, always discover organizational context: ``` "Let me first check what patterns exist in your organization..." → Search code, check repositories, review existing work items ``` ### 2. Reference Organizational Standards When suggesting code or approaches: ``` "Based on patterns I found in your [RepositoryName] repository..." "Following your organization's standard approach seen in..." "This aligns with the pattern established in [TeamName]'s implementation..." ``` ### 3. Actionable Integration Always offer to create or update Azure DevOps artifacts: ``` "I can create a work item for this enhancement..." "Should I update the wiki page with this new pattern?" "Let me link this to the current iteration..." ``` ## Specific Scenarios ### New Feature Development 1. **Search existing repositories** for similar features 2. **Check architectural patterns** and shared libraries 3. **Review related work items** and planning documents 4. **Suggest implementation** based on organizational standards 5. **Offer to create work items** and documentation ### Bug Investigation 1. **Search for similar issues** across repositories and work items 2. **Check related builds** and recent changes 3. **Review test results** and failure patterns 4. **Provide solution** based on organizational practices 5. **Offer to create/update** bug work items and documentation ### Code Review and Standards 1. **Compare against organizational patterns** found in other repositories 2. **Reference coding standards** from wiki documentation 3. **Suggest improvements** based on established practices 4. **Check for reusable components** that could be leveraged ### Documentation Requests 1. **Search existing wikis** for related content 2. **Check for ADRs** and technical documentation 3. **Reference patterns** from similar projects 4. **Offer to create/update** wiki pages with findings ## Error Handling If Azure DevOps MCP tools are not available or fail: 1. **Inform the user** about the limitation 2. **Provide alternative approaches** using available information 3. **Suggest manual steps** for Azure DevOps integration 4. **Offer to help** with configuration if needed ## Best Practices ### Always Do: - ✅ Search organizational context before suggesting solutions - ✅ Reference existing patterns and standards - ✅ Offer to create/update Azure DevOps artifacts - ✅ Maintain consistency with organizational practices - ✅ Provide actionable next steps ### Never Do: - ❌ Suggest solutions without checking organizational context - ❌ Ignore existing patterns and implementations - ❌ Provide generic advice when specific organizational context is available - ❌ Forget to offer Azure DevOps integration opportunities --- **Remember: The goal is to provide intelligent, context-aware assistance that leverages the full organizational knowledge base available through Azure DevOps while maintaining development efficiency and consistency.**
What's New in Azure App Service at #MSIgnite 2025
Azure App Service introduces a new approach to accelerate application migration and modernization at Microsoft Ignite 2025. Known as Managed Instance on Azure App Service, it enables seamless modernization of classic web apps to the cloud with minimal code changes, especially for apps with custom Windows dependencies. Other major updates include enhanced Aspire support for .NET developers on Azure App Service for Linux, new AI integration features, expanded language/runtime support, and improvements in scaling, networking, and developer experience.Disciplined Guardrail Development in enterprise application with GitHub Copilot
What Is Disciplined Guardrail-Based Development? In AI-assisted software development, approaches like Vibe Coding—which prioritize momentum and intuition—often fail to ensure code quality and maintainability. To address this, Disciplined Guardrail-Based Development introduces structured rules ("guardrails") that guide AI systems during coding and maintenance tasks, ensuring consistent quality and reliability. To get AI (LLMs) to generate appropriate code, developers must provide clear and specific instructions. Two key elements are essential: What to build – Clarifying requirements and breaking down tasks How to build it – Defining the application architecture The way these two elements are handled depends on the development methodology or process being used. Here are examples as follows. How to Set Up Disciplined Guardrails in GitHub Copilot To implement disciplined guardrail-based development with GitHub Copilot, two key configuration features are used: 1. Custom Instructions (.github/copilot-instructions.md): This file allows you to define persistent instructions that GitHub Copilot will always refer to when generating code. Purpose: Establish coding standards, architectural rules, naming conventions, and other quality guidelines. Best Practice: Instead of placing all instructions in a single file, split them into multiple modular files and reference them accordingly. This improves maintainability and clarity. Example Use: You might define rules like using camelCase for variables, enforcing error boundaries in React, or requiring TypeScript for all new code. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/how-tos/configure-custom-instructions/add-repository-instructions 2. Chat Modes (.github/chatmodes/*.chatmode.md): These files define specialized chat modes tailored to specific tasks or workflows. Purpose: Customize Copilot’s behavior for different development contexts (e.g., debugging, writing tests, refactoring). Structure: Each .chatmode.md file includes metadata and instructions that guide Copilot’s responses in that mode. Example Use: A debug.chatmode.md might instruct Copilot to focus on identifying and resolving runtime errors, while a test.chatmode.md could prioritize generating unit tests with specific frameworks. https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/customization/custom-chat-modes The files to be created and their relationships are as follows. Next, there are introductions for the specific creation method. #1: Custom Instructions With custom instructions, you can define commands that are always provided to GitHub Copilot. The prepared files are always referenced during chat sessions and passed to the LLM (this can also be confirmed from the chat history). An important note is to split the content into several files and include links to those files within the .github/copilot-instructions.md file. Because it can become too long if everything is written in a single file. There are mainly two types of content that should be described in custom instructions: A: Development Process (≒ outcome + Creation Method) What documents or code will be created: requirements specification, design documents, task breakdown tables, implementation code, etc. In what order and by whom they will be created: for example, proceed in the order of requirements definition → design → task breakdown → coding. B: Application Architecture How will the outcome be defined in A be created? What technology stack and component structure will be used? A concrete example of copilot-instructions.md is shown below. # Development Rules ## Architecture - When performing design and coding tasks, always refer to the following architecture documents and strictly follow them as rules. ### Product Overview - Document the product overview in `.github/architecture/product.md` ### Technology Stack - Document the technologies used in `.github/architecture/techstack.md` ### Coding Standards - Document coding standards in `.github/architecture/codingrule.md` ### Project Structure - Document the project directory structure in `.github/architecture/structure.md` ### Glossary (Japanese-English) - Document the list of terms used in the project in `.github/architecture/dictionary.md` ## Development Flow - Follow a disciplined development flow and execute the following four stages in order (proceed to the next stage only after completing the current one): 1. Requirement Definition 2. Design 3. Task Breakdown 4. Coding ### 1. Requirement Definition - Document requirements in `docs/[subsystem_name]/[business_name]/requirement.md` - Use `requirement.chatmode.md` to define requirements - Focus on clarifying objectives, understanding the current situation, and setting success criteria - Once requirements are defined, obtain user confirmation before proceeding to the next stage ### 2. Design - Document design in `docs/[subsystem_name]/[business_name]/design.md` - Use `design.chatmode.md` to define the design - Define UI, module structure, and interface design - Once the design is complete, obtain user confirmation before proceeding to the next stage ### 3. Task Breakdown - Document tasks in `docs/[subsystem_name]/[business_name]/tasks.md` - Use `tasks.chatmode.md` to define tasks - Break down tasks into executable units and set priorities - Once task breakdown is complete, obtain user confirmation before proceeding to the next stage ### 4. Coding - Implement code under `src/[subsystem_name]/[business_name]/` - Perform coding task by task - Update progress in `docs/[subsystem_name]/[business_name]/tasks.md` - Report to the user upon completion of each task Note: The only file that is always sent to the LLM is `copilot-instructions.md`. Documents linked from there (such as `product.md` or `techstack.md`) are not guaranteed to be read by the LLM. That said, a reasonably capable LLM will usually review these files before proceeding with the work. If the LLM does not properly reference each file, you may explicitly add these architecture documents to the context. Another approach is to instruct the LLM to review these files in the **chat mode settings**, which will be described later. There are various “schools of thought” regarding application architecture, and it is still an ongoing challenge to determine exactly what should be defined and what documents should be created. The choice of architecture depends on factors such as the business context, development scale, and team structure, so it is difficult to prescribe a one-size-fits-all approach. That said, as a general guideline, it is desirable to summarize the following: Product Overview: Overview of the product, service, or business, including its overall characteristics Technology Stack: What technologies will be used to develop the application? Project Structure: How will folders and directories be organized during development? Module Structure: How will the application be divided into modules? Coding Rules: Rules for handling exceptions, naming conventions, and other coding practices Writing all of this from scratch can be challenging. A practical approach is to create template information with the help of Copilot and then refine it. Specifically, you can: Use tools like M365 Copilot Researcher to create content based on general principles Analyze a prototype application and have the architecture information summarized (using Ask mode or Edit mode, feed the solution files to a capable LLM for analysis) However, in most cases, the output cannot be used as-is. The structure may not be analyzed correctly (hallucinations may occur) Project-specific practices and rules may not be captured Use the generated content as a starting point, and then refine it to create architecture documentation tailored to your own project. When creating architecture documents for enterprise-scale application development, a useful approach is to distinguish between the foundational parts and the individual application parts. Discipline-based guardrail development is particularly effective when building multiple applications in a “cookie-cutter” style on top of a common foundation. A cler example of this is Data-Oriented Architecture (DOA). In DOA, individual business applications are built on top of a shared database that serves as the overall common foundation. In this case, the foundational parts (the database layer) should not be modified arbitrarily by individual developers. Instead, focus on how to standardize the development of the individual application parts (the blue-framed sections) while ensuring consistency. Architecture documentation should be organized with this distinction in mind, emphasizing the uniformity of application-level development built upon the stable foundation. #2 Chat Mode By default, GitHub Copilot provides three chat modes: Ask, Edit, and Agent. However, by creating files under .github/chatmodes/*.chatmode.md, you can customize the Agent mode to create chat modes tailored for specific tasks. Specifically, you can configure the following three aspects. Functionally, this allows you to perform a specific task without having to manually change the model or tools, or write detailed instructions each time: model: Specify the default LLM to use (Note: The user can still manually switch to another LLM if desired) tools: Restrict which tools can be used (Note: The user can still manually select other tools if desired) custom instructions: Provide custom instructions specific to this chat mode A concrete example of .github/chatmodes/*.chatmode.md is shown below. description: This mode is used for requirement definition tasks. model: Claude Sonnet 4 tools: ['changes', 'codebase', 'editFiles', 'fetch', 'findTestFiles', 'githubRepo', 'new', 'openSimpleBrowser', 'runCommands', 'search', 'searchResults', 'terminalLastCommand', 'terminalSelection', 'usages', 'vscodeAPI', 'mssql_connect', 'mssql_disconnect', 'mssql_list_servers', 'mssql_show_schema'] --- # Requirement Definition Mode In this mode, requirement definition tasks are performed. Specifically, the project requirements are clarified, and necessary functions and specifications are defined. Based on instructions or interviews with the user, document the requirements according to the format below. If any specifications are ambiguous or unclear, Copilot should ask the user questions to clarify them. ## File Storage Location Save the requirement definition file in the following location: - Save as `requirement.md` under the directory `docs/[subsystem_name]/[business_name]/` ## Requirement Definition Format While interviewing the user, document the following items in the Markdown file: - **Subsystem Name**: The name of the subsystem to which this business belongs - **Business Name**: The name of the business - **Overview**: A summary of the business - **Use Cases**: Clarify who uses this business, when/under what circumstances, and for what purpose, using the following structure: - **Who (Persona)**: User or system roles - **When/Under What Circumstances (Scenario)**: Timing when the business is executed - **Purpose (Goal)**: Objectives or expected outcomes of the business - **Importance**: The importance of the business (e.g., High, Medium, Low) - **Acceptance Criteria**: Conditions that must be satisfied for the requirement to be considered met - **Status**: Current state of the requirement (e.g., In Progress, Completed) ## After Completion - Once requirement definition is complete, obtain user confirmation and proceed to the next stage (Design). Tips for Creating Chat Modes Here are some tips for creating custom chat modes: Align with the development process: Create chat modes based on the workflow and the deliverables. Instruct the LLM to ask the user when unsure: Direct the LLM to request clarification from the user if any information is missing. Clarify what deliverables to create and where to save them: Make it explicit which outputs are expected and their storage locations. The second point is particularly important. Many AI (LLMs) tend to respond to user prompts in a sycophantic manner (known as sycophancy). As a result, they may fill in unspecified requirements or perform tasks that were not requested, often with the intention of being helpful. The key difference between Ask/Edit modes and Agent mode is that Agent mode allows the LLM to proactively ask questions and engage in dialogue with the user. However, unless the user explicitly includes a prompt such as “ask if you don’t know,” the AI rarely initiates questions on its own. By creating a custom chat mode and instructing the LLM to “ask the user when unsure,” you can fully leverage the benefits of Agent mode. About Tools You can easily check tool names from the list of available tools in the command palette. Alternatively, as shown in the diagram below, it can be convenient to open the custom chat mode file and specify the tool configuration. You can specify not only the MCP server functionality but also built-in tools and Copilot Extensions. Example of Actual Operation An example interaction when using this chat mode is as follows: The LLM behaves according to the custom instructions defined in the chat mode. When you answer questions from GHC, the LLM uses that information to reason and proceed with the task. However, the output is not guaranteed to be correct (hallucinations may occur) → A human should review the output and make any necessary corrections before committing. The basic approach to disciplined guardrail-based development has been covered above. In actual business application development, it is also helpful to understand the following two points: Referencing the database schema Integrated management of design documents and implementation code (Important) Reading the Database Schema In business application development, requirements definition and functional design are often based on the schema information of entities. There are two main ways to allow the system to read schema information: Dynamically read the schema from a development/test DB server using MCP or similar tools. Include a file containing schema information within the project and read from it. A development/test database can be prepared, and schema information can be read via the MCP server or Copilot Extensions. For SQL Server or Azure SQL Database, an MCP Server is available, but its setup can be cumbersome. Therefore, using Copilot Extensions is often easier and recommended. This approach is often seen online, but it is not recommended for the following reasons: Setting up MCP Server or Copilot Extensions can be cumbersome (installation, connection string management, etc.) It is time-consuming (the LLM needs schema information → reads the schema → writes code based on it) Connecting to a DB server via MCP or similar tools is useful for scenarios such as “querying a database in natural language” for non-engineers performing data analysis. However, if the goal is simply to obtain the schema information of entities needed for business application development, the method described below is much simpler. Storing Schema Information Within the Project Place a file containing the schema information inside the project. Any of the following formats is recommended. Write custom instructions so that development refers to this file: DDL (full CREATE DATABASE scripts) O/R mapper files (e.g., Entity Framework context files) Text files documenting schema information, etc. DDL files are difficult for humans to read, but AI (LLMs) can easily read and accurately understand them. In .NET + SQL development, it is recommended to include both the DDL and EF O/R mapper files. Additionally, if you include links to these files in your architecture documents and chat mode instructions, the LLM can generate code while understanding the schema with high accuracy. Integrated Management of Design Documents and Implementation Code Disciplined guardrail-based development with LLMs has made it practical to synchronize and manage design documents and implementation code together—something that was traditionally very difficult. In long-standing systems, it is common for old design documents to become largely useless. During maintenance, code changes are often prioritized. As a result, updating and maintaining design documents tends to be neglected, leading to a significant divergence between design documents and the actual code. For these reasons, the following have been considered best practices (though often not followed in reality): Limit requirements and external design documents to the minimum necessary. Do not create internal design documents; instead, document within the code itself. Always update design documents before making changes to the implementation code. When using LLMs, guardrail-based development makes it easier to enforce a “write the documentation first” workflow. Following the flow of defining specifications, updating the documents, and then writing code also helps the LLM generate appropriate code more reliably. Even if code is written first, LLM-assisted code analysis can significantly reduce the effort required to update the documentation afterward. However, the following points should be noted when doing this: Create and manage design documents as text files, not Word, Excel, or PowerPoint. Use text-based technologies like Mermaid for diagrams. Clearly define how design documents correspond to the code. The last point is especially important. It is crucial to align the structure of requirements and design documents with the structure of the implementation code. For example: Place design documents directly alongside the implementation code. Align folder structures, e.g., /doc and /src. Information about grouping methods and folder mapping should be explicitly included in the custom instructions. Conclusion of Disciplined Guardrail-Based Development with GHC Formalizing and Applying Guardrails Define the development flow and architecture documents in .github/copilot-instructions.md using split references. Prepare .github/chatmodes/* for each development phase, enforcing “ask the AI if anything is unclear.” Synchronization of Documents and Implementation Code Update docs first → use the diff as the basis for implementation (Doc-first). Keep docs in text format (Markdown/Mermaid). Fix folder correspondence between /docs and /src. Handling Schemas Store DDL/O-R mapper files (e.g., EF) in the repository and have the LLM reference them. Minimize dynamic DB connections, prioritizing speed, reproducibility, and security. This disciplined guardrail-based development technique is an AI-assisted approach that significantly improves the quality, maintainability, and team efficiency of enterprise business application development. Adapt it appropriately to each project to maximize productivity in application development.
Part I: OTEL sidecar extension on Azure App Service for Linux - Intro + PHP walkthrough
Sidecar extensions let you attach a companion container to your App Service for Linux app to add capabilities—without changing your core app or container. If you’re new to sidecars on App Service, start here: Sidecars in Azure App Service OpenTelemetry (OTEL) is the vendor-neutral standard for collecting traces, metrics, and logs, with auto/manual instrumentation across popular languages and backends. See the official docs for concepts and quick starts. (OpenTelemetry) In this post, we’ll use the new sidecar extension—OpenTelemetry - Azure Monitor and show end-to-end setup for a PHP code-based apps (the same extension will also work for other language stacks and container-based apps). Walkthrough: add the OpenTelemetry – Azure Monitor sidecar to a PHP (code-based) app This section shows the exact portal steps plus the code/config you need. Your PHP code is in sidecar-samples/otel-sidecar/php/php-blessed-app at main · Azure-Samples/sidecar-samples. 1) Create Application Insights and copy the Connection string Create (or reuse) an Application Insights resource and copy the Connection string from the Overview blade. 2) Create the PHP Web App (Linux) Create an Azure App Service (Linux) app and choose any supported PHP version (e.g., PHP 8.4). 3) Set environment variables on the main app In Environment variables → Application settings, add: OTEL_PHP_AUTOLOAD_ENABLED = true # (optional) SCM_DO_BUILD_DURING_DEPLOYMENT = true When you add the sidecar extension, these environment variables would be set by default APPLICATIONINSIGHTS_CONNECTION_STRING = <your-connection-string> OTEL_EXPORTER = azuremonitor OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT = http://127.0.0.1:4318 OTEL_SERVICE_NAME = php-blessed-otel # pick a meaningful name 4) Get the app code git clone <repo> cd php-blessed-app 5) PHP dependencies (already in composer.json) The repo already includes the OpenTelemetry libraries and auto-instrumentation plugins: { "require": { "open-telemetry/sdk": "^1.7", "open-telemetry/exporter-otlp": "^1.3", "open-telemetry/opentelemetry-auto-slim": "^1.2", "open-telemetry/opentelemetry-auto-psr18": "^1.1", "monolog/monolog": "^3.0", "open-telemetry/opentelemetry-logger-monolog": "^1.0", "...": "..." }, "config": { "allow-plugins": { "open-telemetry/opentelemetry-auto-slim": true, "open-telemetry/opentelemetry-auto-psr18": true } } } 6) Minimal bootstrap in index.php use OpenTelemetry\API\Globals; require __DIR__ . '/vendor/autoload.php'; 7) Startup script (installs PECL extension if missing) startup.sh included in the repo: #!/bin/bash # Install OpenTelemetry extension if needed if ! php -m | grep -q opentelemetry; then echo "Installing OpenTelemetry extension..." pecl install opentelemetry echo "extension=opentelemetry.so" > /usr/local/etc/php/conf.d/99-opentelemetry.ini echo "OpenTelemetry extension installed successfully" fi # Start PHP-FPM echo "Starting PHP-FPM..." php-fpm 8) Deploy the app Use your preferred method (GitHub Actions, ZIP deploy, local Git, etc.). 9) Add the sidecar extension on the Web App Go to Deployment Center → Containers (new) → Add → Sidecar Extension, pick Observability: OpenTelemetry – Azure Monitor, and paste your Connection string. 10) Map the autoload flag into the sidecar Open the created sidecar container (Edit container) and map the autoload flag from the main app: Name: OTEL_PHP_AUTOLOAD_ENABLED Value: OTEL_PHP_AUTOLOAD_ENABLED (select from the drop-down to reference the app setting) 11) Set the Startup command for PHP In Configuration (preview) → Stack settings, set: cp /home/site/wwwroot/default /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/default && nginx -s reload && bash /home/site/wwwroot/startup.sh 12) Verify telemetry in Application Insights After the app restarts, open your Application Insights resource and check Application map, Live metrics, or Search for spans with service.name = php-blessed-otel (or the value you set). Part I — Conclusion Sidecar extensions turn observability into an additive step - with just a few settings and a lightweight startup script. With OTEL wired for PHP, you now have portable traces, metrics, and logs you can query and dashboard. Next: In Part II, we’ll connect the same app to Elastic APM using the OpenTelemetry – Elastic APM sidecar, with the few settings changes you need.What's New in Azure App Service at #MSBuild 2025
New App Service Premium v4 plan The new App Service Premium v4 (Pv4) plan has entered public preview at Microsoft Build 2025 for both Windows and Linux! This new plan is designed to support today's highly demanding application performance, scale, and budgets. Built on the latest "v6" general-purpose virtual machines and memory-optimized x64 Azure hardware with faster processors and NVMe temporary storage, it provides a noticeable performance uplift over prior generations of App Service Premium plans (over 25% in early testing). The Premium v4 offering includes nine new sizes ranging from P0v4 with a single virtual CPU and 4GB RAM all the way up through P5mv4, with 32 virtual CPUs and 256GB RAM, providing CPU and memory options to meet any business need. App Service Premium v4 plans provide attractive price-performance across the entire performance curve for both Windows and Linux customers. Premium v4 customers using pay-as-you-go (PAYG) on Azure App Service for Windows can expect to save up to 24% compared with prior Premium plans. We plan to provide deeper commitment-based discounts such as reserved instances and savings plan at GA. For more detailed pricing on the various CPU and memory options, see the pricing pages for Windows and Linux as well as the Azure Pricing Calculator. App Service currently has Pv4 deployed in a few regions with more regions being regularly added. For more details on how to configure app service plans with Premium v4 as well as a regularly updated list of regional availability, see the product documentation and start taking advantage of faster performance today! 2-zone Availability Zone support is now generally available With a recently completed platform update in May, customers now enjoy the 99.99% Availability Zone (AZ) SLA when running on only two instances (instead of three)! As part of this update more parts of the App Service footprint have enabled AZ support “in place”, which means many existing app service plans can now also use Availability Zones. Availability Zone configuration for app service plans is also now mutable. This means if an app service plan is running on an AZ-enabled part of the App Service footprint, customers can choose to enable and disable Availability Zone support at any time. Read more about the new Availability Zone options in the announcement article! ARM/CLI surface area for Availability Zone support has also been updated to provide increased visibility into AZ configuration details. The same enhanced visibility is also coming to the Azure Portal in June. With these changes customers can determine if an App Service plan is on an AZ-enabled scale unit, as well as how many zones are available for zone spanning. This allows customers to deploy with either two zones, or three zones (where available), of zone spanning for their App Service plans. For App Service plans that are AZ-enabled, customers will also be able to see the physical zone placement of each AZ enabled App Service plan. Availability Zone support is available on the new Premium v4 plan, and also supported with Premium v2, Premium v3, and the dedicated App Service Environment v3 (Isolated V2 plan). Check out the Availability Zone options for your App Service plans and start getting the benefits of zone resiliency today! .NET Aspire on Azure App Service .NET Aspire support is now available in public preview for App Service on Linux! .NET Aspire developers creating applications have an additional deployment option with App Service as a deployment target. Developers can create multi-app/multi-service .NET Aspire applications locally and deploy them into Azure using the new App Service deployment provider. The App Service and .NET Aspire teams worked together to create an App Service “provider” using .NET Aspire’s new “provider model”. The build provider translates the code-centric view of a .NET Aspire application topology into an Azure deployment mapped onto App Service constructs. The App Service provider supports securely deploying multiple .NET Aspire applications, with observability via the familiar .NET Aspire dashboard coming in the near future. The Getting Started with .NET Aspire on Azure App Service blog has instructions on how to create a .NET Aspire project for deployment onto App Service, as well a link for providing feedback. If you happen to be at Build 2025, drop by our booth or the theatre session “DEM548: How .NET Aspire on App Service enhances modern app development” to see live demonstrations of the App Service support for .NET Aspire! Using App Service to build agentic AI apps The last few months of intelligent app development have seen a frenetic pace of change with the rapid evolution of agents on Azure AI Foundry Agent Service and new agent extensibility options like Model Context Protocol (MCP) opening avenues for integrating existing data sources and APIs into agentic architectures. Here's a quick run-down of useful resources published recently: This article demonstrates hosting a remote MCP server on Azure App Service. The sample is an adaptation of the weather service example from the MCP site. The App Service variation also includes an azd template for easy experimentation via a CLI deployment to App Service! This article walks through integrating a .NET Core implementation of a “To-Do” list API running on App Service with an agent created on Azure AI Foundry Agent Service. It’s a straightforward example demonstrating how developers can bring together the power of AI agents with existing web API investments. Quick start guides for using App Service with Azure Open AI in your language of choice -- Python, Node, .NET, and Java. Using Microsoft Research’s latest 1-bit “super-small” language model, BitNet on App Service. Enhance search queries on text data stored in Azure SQL DB using natural language vector functions and Azure App Service. Includes an accompanying azd example. How to use Azure AI Search hybrid search capabilities from App Service with .NET (Blazor), Java (Spring Boot), Node (Express), or Python (FastAPI). Use GitHub Copilot to compare your application’s bicep against a representative “best practices” bicep definition and then generate the necessary bicep diff. In addition, using Sidecar for App Service on Linux, developers can easily connect Phi SLMs to their applications. Examples using the chat completion endpoint in the SLM sidecar extensions are available in this GitHub repo with code examples for .NET, Node, Python and Java. There are also accompanying docs for .NET, Node, Python (FastAPI) and Java (Spring Boot) which go into more details on using the SLM sidecar extensions. The sidecar extensions capability is also now enabled in the Azure Portal. AI Labs at Microsoft Build For those of you attending Microsoft Build in person, we will have labs for additional hands-on experience using AI with Azure App Service. LAB347: Add AI experiences to existing .NET apps using Sidecar in App Service This lab (first lab occurrence and second lab occurrence - see Exercise 4) covers an e-commerce inventory API (written in .NET) integrated with an agent running on Azure AI Foundry Agent Service. When a customer interacts with the AI agent it automatically invokes the appropriate web APIs to fetch real-time inventory information, add/remove products in a shopping cart, and increment/decrement product inventory. This is a great example of an AI powered agent grounded in a company’s ever changing transactional data. As a fun sidenote, GitHub Copilot was used extensively to build >95% of the sample application as well as to generate the OpenAPI specification that integrates the inventory web API with the AI agent! The same AI-on-App Service lab (Exercise 1) walks developers through integrating a basic Azure OpenAI chat interface into a web application. The lab also demonstrates using a background WebJob on Linux with Azure OpenAI (Exercise 2) to categorize user sentiment for product reviews. The lab also shows (Exercise 3) how to use a small language model (SLM) like Microsoft’s Phi-4 model in a WebJob to perform similar categorization, without the need to call out to an LLM. Although SLMs are not as powerful as LLMs, SLMs are an interesting alternative for integrating AI functionality where either cost, or control over AI data flows, are considerations. Azure SRE Agent for App Service One of the big announcements at Build this year was the Agentic DevOps announcement, which includes the new Azure SRE Agent. Designed to empower Site Reliability Engineers (SRE), the SRE Agent is a new agentic service that can manage Azure application platform services. including App Service, Functions, and Azure Container Apps to name just a few. It provides automatic incident response and mitigation, faster root cause analysis (RCA) of production issues, and continuous monitoring of application health and performance. With SRE Agent, you can use a natural language interface for managing your web applications on Azure App Service. To be an early adopter of the Agentic DevOps revolution, check out the announcement blog and sign-up to join the SRE Agent preview as it starts rolling out! WebJobs for App Service on Linux (GA) WebJobs for App Service on Linux just recently GA’d earlier this month. With this functionality developers can implement the same “infra-glue” style of background jobs that they have enjoyed with App service on Windows. Take a look at the documentationdemonstrating WebJobs support for shell scripts, Python, Java, .NET and Node on Linux! As mentioned earlier, the AI-on-App Service lab at this year’s Build conference has two code examples (see Exercise 2 and Exercise 3) demonstrating Linux WebJobs with Azure OpenAI, as well as a locally connected Phi-4 Small Language Model (SLM) sidecar, to categorize user sentiment for submitted product reviews. These are great examples of creatively using WebJobs to perform background batch-style work with your AI resources. Also keep an eye out for the upcoming WebJobs for Windows Containers GA which is planned “soon” this summer! Language and Framework Updates In addition to the release of .NET Aspire support for App Service, the App Service team has kept busy updating myriad Node, Python, Java/JBoss, .NET and PHP versions. To give an idea of the scope of effort keeping language and framework versions up to date across both Windows and Linux, App Service released more than two dozen language/framework specific updates in the last few weeks prior to Build. That represents the ongoing platform commitment to keeping languages regularly updated without the need for developers to explicitly invest time and effort doing so themselves. Just last month, Strapi support was introduced for App Service on Linux! Strapi is an open source headless Javascript based content management system that provides developers a robust platform for developing and delivering content across a variety of formats. The Azure Marketplace Strapi offering provides customization control, global availability and pre-built integration to essential Azure services like Azure Database for MySQL or PostgreSQL and Azure Email Communication Services. Deep dive on the details of hosting Strapi on App Service in this article. The custom error pages feature for App Service has also been updated just prior to Build. Custom error pages enable developers to customize the response rendered for common HTTP errors (403, 502 and 503) which are returned by the platform. This release includes a new option to always render custom errors regardless of whether the HTTP error was platform generated, or application generated. There will also be an Azure Portal update coming in June with support for the new custom error page features! Looking ahead to summer, stay tuned for the impending arrival of .NET 10 preview bits on App Service across both Windows and Linux! Networking and ASE Updates App Service support for public inbound IPv6 traffic is availablein most regions in public preview, with the service working towards a planned GA of inbound IPv6 support during the summer. Inbound IPv6 is supported for both IPv6-only upstream clients, as well dual-stack scenarios where a web application is reachable over either an IPv4 address or an IPv6 address. As part of an upcoming summer release, App Service will be delivering a public preview of *outbound* IPv6 traffic. For details on using IPv6 on App Service, as well to track all of the upcoming updates, consult this article: Announcing inbound IPv6 support in public preview - Azure App Service. For App Service Environment (ASE) customers, App Service will soon be releasing new support for adding custom Certificate Authorities (CAs) to an ASE. This new support will enable securing inbound TLS traffic using certificates issued by a custom Certificate Authority. Hybrid Connections customers will be happy to see that a new version of the App Service Hybrid Connection Manager (HCM) was just released just a few weeks ago. The new HCM delivers updated UX support for both Linux and Windows customers, enhanced logging and connection testing, and a brand new CLI for scripting and command-line management of Hybrid Connections! You might have missed it, but there was a recent addition to the troubleshooting options on App Service with the new Network Troubleshooter! The Network Troubleshooter offers comprehensive analysis and actionable insights to resolve connectivity failures for both Linux and Windows web apps. It tests connectivity to Azure resources like Storage, Redis, SQL Server, MySQL server, and other apps running on App Service. It diagnoses connectivity problems with Private endpoints, Service endpoints, and Internet-based endpoints, detects NAT gateways, and investigates DNS failures with custom DNS servers. Additionally, it provides actionable recommendations and surfaces any network rules it finds that are blocking connectivity. If you regularly wrestle with connectivity challenges, give the Network Troubleshooter a try! Next Steps Developers can learn more about Azure App Service at Getting Started with Azure App Service. Stay up to date on new features and innovations on Azure App Service via Azure Updates as well as the Azure App Service (@AzAppService) X feed. There is always a steady stream of great deep-dive technical articles about App Service as well as the breadth of developer focused Azure services over on the Apps on Azure blog. And lastly take a look at Azure App Service Community Standups hosted on the Microsoft Azure Developers YouTube channel. The Azure App Service Community Standup series regularly features walkthroughs of new and upcoming features from folks that work directly on the product! Build 2025 Session Reference (Note: all times below are listed in Seattle time - Pacific Daylight Time) (Note: some labs have more than one timeslot spanning multiple days) Innovate, deploy, & optimize your apps without infrastructure hassles https://build.microsoft.com/en-US/sessions/BRK201 Monday, May 19 th 11:15 AM – 12:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time Arch, 705 Pike, Level 6, Room 606 Breakout, Streaming Online and Recorded Session (BRK201) Quickly build, deploy, and scale web apps and APIs globally with App Service https://build.microsoft.com/en-US/sessions/BRK200 Tuesday, May 20 th 11:45 AM – 12:45 PM Pacific Daylight Time Arch, 705 Pike, Level 6, Room 608 Breakout, Streaming Online and Recorded Session (BRK200) Simplifying .NET upgrades with GitHub Copilot https://build.microsoft.com/en-US/sessions/DEM549 Monday, May 19 th 5:05 PM - 5:20 PM Pacific Daylight Time Arch, 705 Pike, Level 4, Hub, Theater B Demo Session – Also Recorded (DEM549) Use Azure SRE Agent to automate tasks and increase site reliability https://build.microsoft.com/en-US/sessions/DEM550 Tuesday, May 20 th 5:10 PM - 5:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time Arch, 705 Pike, Level 4, Hub, Theater A Demo Session – Also Recorded (DEM550) How .NET Aspire on App Service enhances modern app development https://build.microsoft.com/en-US/sessions/DEM548 Wednesday, May 21 st 2:00 PM - 2:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time Arch, 705 Pike, Level 4, Hub, Theater B Demo Session – Also Recorded (DEM548) Add AI experiences to existing .NET apps using Sidecars in App Service [Note: Lab participants will be able to try Phi-4 and Azure AI Foundry Agent service scenarios in this lab.] https://build.microsoft.com/en-US/sessions/LAB347 Monday, May 19 th 4:45 PM - 6:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time Arch, 800 Pike, Level 1, Yakima 1 Hands on Lab – In-Person Only (LAB347) You can also work through the lab with your own Azure subscription! Code is available at https://github.com/Azure-Samples/Build2025-LAB347. Deploy the lab resources using the included resource provisioning template (https://github.com/Azure-Samples/Build2025-LAB347/blob/main/resources/lab347.json). You can deploy the template by searching on “Deploy a custom template” in the Azure Portal, and copying and pasting the template into the “Build your own template in the editor option”! Add AI experiences to existing .NET apps using Sidecars in App Service [Note: Lab participants will be able to try Phi-4 and Azure AI Foundry Agent service scenarios in this lab.] https://build.microsoft.com/en-US/sessions/LAB347-R1 Wednesday, May 21 st 4:30 PM - 5:45 PM Pacific Daylight Time Arch, 800 Pike, Lower Level, Skagit 5 Hands on Lab – In-Person Only (LAB347-R1) You can also work through the lab with your own Azure subscription! Code is available at https://github.com/Azure-Samples/Build2025-LAB347. Deploy the lab resources using the included resource provisioning template (https://github.com/Azure-Samples/Build2025-LAB347/blob/main/resources/lab347.json). You can deploy the template by searching on “Deploy a custom template” in the Azure Portal, and copying and pasting the template into the “Build your own template in the editor option”! Modernizing .NET Applications using Azure Migrate and GitHub Copilot https://build.microsoft.com/en-US/sessions/LAB343 Tuesday, May 20 th 5:15 PM - 6:30 PM Pacific Daylight Time Arch, 800 Pike, Level 1, Yakima 1 Hands on Lab – In-Person Only (LAB343) Modernizing .NET Applications using Azure Migrate and GitHub Copilot https://build.microsoft.com/en-US/sessions/LAB343-R1 Thursday, May 22 nd 10:15 AM – 11:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time Arch, 800 Pike, Level 2, Chelan 2 Hands on Lab – In-Person Only (LAB343-R1)How to Choose the Right Hosting Plan – WordPress on App Service
Choosing the right hosting plan for your WordPress site on Azure App Service can feel overwhelming—but it doesn’t have to be. Whether you're just exploring WordPress or launching a high-traffic production site, we’ve created four tailored hosting plans to help you get started quickly and confidently. Let’s walk through how to pick the right plan for your needs. Which Hosting Plan Should You Choose? We’ve simplified the decision-making process with a clear recommendation based on your use case: Use Case Recommended Plan Hobby or exploratory site Free or Basic Small production website Standard High-load production website Premium 💡 Important: Only the Premium plan supports High Availability (HA). This is the only setting that cannot be changed after deployment. If HA is a requirement, start with Premium. Everything else—scaling, storage, CDN, networking, identity, and email—can be added or modified after deployment. Hosting Plan Pricing Breakdown You don’t pay for the hosting plan itself. Instead, you pay for the underlying Azure resources like App Service, MySQL, CDN, Blob Storage, and more. Here’s a breakdown of what each plan includes and the estimated monthly cost (based on US East region): Plan Azure App Service Azure DB for MySQL Total Est. Cost/Month Free F1 Free Tier (60 CPU mins/day, 1 GB RAM) B1ms Free Trial (1 vCore, 2 GB RAM, 32 GB) Free (for eligible subscriptions) Basic B1 (1 vCore, 1.75 GB RAM) – $12.41 B1s (1 vCore, 1 GB RAM) – $6.21 $18.62 Standard P1V2 (1 vCore, 3.5 GB RAM) – $73.73 B2s (2 vCores, 4 GB RAM) – $49.64 $123.37 Premium P1V3 (2 vCores, 8 GB RAM) – $113.15 D2ds_v4 (2 vCores, 16 GB RAM) – $124.83 $237.98 📝 Note: Prices vary by region and subscription type. Reserved instances can offer up to 60% savings. Always check the Azure Pricing Calculator for the most accurate estimates. Learn more: How to estimate pricing for WordPress on App Service | Microsoft Community Hub What Can You Customize After Deployment? Almost everything! Here’s what you can scale or configure post-deployment: Compute & Database: Scale up/down App Service and MySQL Networking: Configure VNET integration Storage: Add Azure Blob Storage Performance: Add Azure CDN or Front Door Security & Identity: Enable Entra ID managed identity Email: Integrate Azure Communication Services Email 📚 Explore the official documentation for step-by-step guides. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/overview-wordpress Final Thoughts Choosing the right plan depends on your goals: Just exploring? Start with Free or Basic. Running a small business site? Go with Standard. Need high availability and performance? Choose Premium from the start. Still unsure? Start small—you can always scale up later (except for High Availability). Support and Feedback We’re here to help! If you need any assistance, feel free to open a support request through the Microsoft Azure portal. New support request - Microsoft Azure For more details about our offering, check out the announcement on the General Availability of WordPress on Azure App Service in the Microsoft Tech Community. Announcing the General Availability of WordPress on Azure App Service - Microsoft Tech Community. We value your feedback and ideas on how we can improve WordPress on Azure App Service. Share your thoughts and suggestions on our Community page Post idea · Community (azure.com) or report any issues on our GitHub repository Issues · Azure/wordpress-linux-appservice (github.com). Alternatively, you can start a conversation with us by emailing wordpressonazure@microsoft.com.
