http connection
2 TopicsPnP and HTTP - Sharepoint 2016 OnPremise
Hi all, I work with a bunch of pnp scripts in a sharepoint 2016 on premise intranet. These scripts are complex but they are working fine for several months. I use https protocol for all my site collections and web application. Recently, I tried to deploy these scripts over an HTTP site collection but I always get several, and random, time out errors. My question is, could be that PNP doesn't work ok with HTTP and HTTPS is required? Thanks!1.3KViews0likes1CommentAzure app service - http performance
Hi, as part of a project we have multiple app services running on azure. These services communicate with each other via http. As part of this project, we started running load tests and noticed surprisingly slow results even with, in our opinion, small number of requests. In order to identify performance issues, I created 2 small web apps, 1 using .net and 1 using node.js. Both apps provide a REST API that is called from our load tests running in VS Online. The apps call a single azure function that does a simple Thread.Sleep(1000) and returns, no other processing is done. Trying both vertical and horizontal scaling, I got the following results: Single B1 instance # of requests Avg. response in s .net Node.js 100 1.5 1.7 300 3.1 6.6 500 7.1 23.4 Single B3 instance # of requests Avg. response in s .net Node.js 100 1.7 1.5 300 5.3 4 500 6.5 10.2 3 B1 instances # of requests Avg. response in s .net Node.js 100 1.4 3.5 300 4.6 4.9 500 6.7 15.1 3 B3 instances # of requests Avg. response in s .net Node.js 100 1.4 3.5 300 4.6 4.9 500 7.5 7.2 Looking at these results, it seems like the choice of technology (.net or node.js) does not have a big impact on performance. Generally however, the avg. response times seem very long, especially since there is no real processing or business logic in the applications itself. Of course e.g 500 concurrent requests equals a much larger number of users on the platform but it seems like this should still take a lot less time than is seen in the test results. The configuration of both applications is completely default, so I am wondering if there is anything we should consider to improve performance. This is a rather important issue because we have a strong requirement of response times of less than 3 seconds. Thanks and best regards, Juergen Ziegler1.3KViews0likes0Comments