Hypervisor Footprint Debate Part 3: Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V & VMware ESXi 3.5
First published on TECHNET on Aug 17, 2009 In my last two blog posts (Part 1 & Part 2), I started an in depth analysis tackling VMware's claims head on that because their disk footprint is smaller and ESX/ESXi are single purpose hypervisors, they are therefore more secure.Hyper-V Cloud Fast Track Architecture Brief
First published on TECHNET on Feb 10, 2011 So you heard about the Hyper-V Cloud Fast Track program and wonder … what exactly is it? Is it marketecture or is there some meat to it? What do these “pre-architected, pre-validated” solutions consist of, and how were those decisions arrived at? What was the architecture and validation methodology? Well my friend, this post is for you.Virtualization for Server Workloads: Avanade Case Study, NetApp Whitepaper
First published on TECHNET on Mar 08, 2010 Our customers often deploy Microsoft server workloads, such as SQL Server, SharePoint and Exchange, on Microsoft Hyper-V and System Center, and want to know how other customers have deployed these workloads and if there are deployment guidelines from specific solution partners that can help optimize for scale and business continuity.
