From Healthy to Unhealthy: Alerting on Defender for Cloud Recommendations with Logic Apps
In today's cloud-first environments, maintaining strong security posture requires not just visibility but real-time awareness of changes. This blog walks you through a practical solution to monitor and alert on Microsoft Defender for Cloud recommendations that transition from Healthy to Unhealthy status. By combining the power of Kusto Query Language (KQL) with the automation capabilities of Azure Logic Apps, you’ll learn how to: Query historical and current security recommendation states using KQL Detect resources that have degraded in compliance over the past 14 days Send automatic email alerts when issues are detected Customize the email content with HTML tables for easy readability Handle edge cases, like sending a “no issues found” email when nothing changes Whether you're a security engineer, cloud architect, or DevOps practitioner, this solution helps you close the gap between detection and response and ensure that no security regressions go unnoticed. Prerequisites Before implementing the monitoring and alerting solution described in this blog, ensure the following prerequisites are met: Microsoft Defender for Cloud is Enabled Defender for Cloud must be enabled on the target Azure subscriptions/management group. It should be actively monitoring your resources (VMs, SQL, App Services, etc.). Make sure the recommendations are getting generated. Continuous Export is Enabled for Security Recommendations Continuous export should be configured to send security recommendations to a Log Analytics workspace. This enables you to query historical recommendation state using KQL. You can configure continuous export by going to: Defender for Cloud → Environment settings → Select Subscription → Continuous Export Then enable export for Security Recommendations to your chosen Log Analytics workspace. Detailed guidance on setting up continuous export can be found here: Set up continuous export in the Azure portal - Microsoft Defender for Cloud | Microsoft Learn High-Level Summary of the Automation Flow This solution provides a fully automated way to track and alert on security posture regressions in Microsoft Defender for Cloud. By integrating KQL queries with Azure Logic Apps, you can stay informed whenever a resource's security recommendation changes from Healthy to Unhealthy. Here's how the flow works: Microsoft Defender for Cloud evaluates Azure resources and generates security recommendations based on best practices and potential vulnerabilities. These recommendations are continuously exported to a Log Analytics workspace, enabling historical analysis over time. A scheduled Logic App runs a KQL query that compares: Recommendations from ~14 days ago (baseline), With those from the last 7 days (current state). If any resources are found to have shifted from Healthy to Unhealthy, the Logic App: Formats the data into an HTML table, and Sends an email alert with the affected resource details and recommendation metadata. If no such changes are found, an optional email can be sent stating that all monitored resources remain compliant — providing peace of mind and audit trail coverage. This approach enables teams to proactively monitor security drift, reduce manual oversight, and ensure timely remediation of emerging security issues. Logic Apps Flow This Logic App is scheduled to trigger daily. It runs a KQL query against a Log Analytics workspace to identify resources that have changed from Healthy to Unhealthy status over the past two weeks. If such changes are detected, the results are formatted into an HTML table and emailed to the security team for review and action. KQL Query used here: // Get resources that are currently unhealthy within the last 7 days let now_unhealthy = SecurityRecommendation | where TimeGenerated > ago(7d) | where RecommendationState == "Unhealthy" // For each resource and recommendation, get the latest record | summarize arg_max(TimeGenerated, *) by AssessedResourceId, RecommendationDisplayName; // Get resources that were healthy approximately 14 days ago (between 12 and 14 days ago) let past_healthy = SecurityRecommendation | where TimeGenerated between (ago(14d) .. ago(12d)) | where RecommendationState == "Healthy" // For each resource and recommendation, get the latest record in that time window | summarize arg_max(TimeGenerated, *) by AssessedResourceId, RecommendationDisplayName; // Join current unhealthy resources with their healthy state 14 days ago now_unhealthy | join kind=inner past_healthy on AssessedResourceId, RecommendationDisplayName | project AssessedResourceId, // Unique ID of the assessed resource RecommendationDisplayName, // Name of the security recommendation RecommendationSeverity, // Severity level of the recommendation Description, // Description explaining the recommendation State_14DaysAgo = RecommendationState1,// Resource state about 14 days ago (should be "Healthy") State_Recent = RecommendationState, // Current resource state (should be "Unhealthy") Timestamp_14DaysAgo = TimeGenerated1, // Timestamp from ~14 days ago Timestamp_Recent = TimeGenerated // Most recent timestamp Once this logic app executes successfully, you’ll get an email as per your configuration. This email includes: A brief introduction explaining the situation. The number of affected recommendations. A formatted HTML table with detailed information: AssessedResourceId: The full Azure resource ID. RecommendationDisplayName: What Defender recommends (e.g., “Enable MFA”). Severity: Low, Medium, High. Description: What the recommendation means and why it matters. State_14DaysAgo: The previous (Healthy) state. State_Recent: The current (Unhealthy) state. Timestamps: When the states were recorded. Sample Email for reference: What the Security Team Can Do with It? Review the Impact Quickly identify which resources have degraded in security posture. Assess if the changes are critical (e.g., exposed VMs, missing patching). Prioritize Remediation Use the severity level to triage what needs immediate attention. Assign tasks to the right teams — infrastructure, app owners, etc. Correlate with Other Alerts Cross-check with Microsoft Sentinel, vulnerability scanners, or SIEM rules. Investigate whether these changes are expected, neglected, or malicious. Track and Document Use the email as a record of change in security posture. Log it in ticketing systems (like Jira or ServiceNow) manually or via integration. Optional Step: Initiate Remediation Playbooks Based on the resource type and issue, teams may: Enable security agents, Update configurations, Apply missing patches, Isolate the resource (if necessary). Automating alerts for resources that go from Healthy to Unhealthy in Defender for Cloud makes life a lot easier for security teams. It helps you catch issues early, act faster, and keep your cloud environment safe without constantly watching dashboards. Give this Logic App a try and see how much smoother your security monitoring and response can be! Access the JSON deployment file for this Logic App here: Microsoft-Unified-Security-Operations-Platform/Microsoft Defender for Cloud/ResourcesMovingFromHealthytoUnhealthyState/ARMTemplate-HealthytoUnhealthyResources(MDC).json at main · Abhishek-Sharan/Microsoft-Unified-Security-Operations-PlatformOptimize Azure Log Costs: Split Tables and Use the Auxiliary Tier with DCR
This blog is continuation of my previous blog where I discussed about saving ingestion costs by splitting logs into multiple tables and opting for the basic tier! Now that the transformation feature for Auxiliary logs has entered Public Preview stage, I’ll take a deeper dive, showing how to implement transformations to split logs across tables and route some of them to the Auxiliary tier. A quick refresher: Azure Monitor offers several log plans which our customers can opt for depending on their use cases. These log plans include: Analytics Logs – This plan is designed for frequent, concurrent access and supports interactive usage by multiple users. This plan drives the features in Azure Monitor Insights and powers Microsoft Sentinel. It is designed to manage critical and frequently accessed logs optimized for dashboards, alerts, and business advanced queries. Basic Logs – Improved to support even richer troubleshooting and incident response with fast queries while saving costs. Now available with a longer retention period and the addition of KQL operators to aggregate and lookup. Auxiliary Logs – Our new, inexpensive log plan that enables ingestion and management of verbose logs needed for auditing and compliance scenarios. These may be queried with KQL on an infrequent basis and used to generate summaries. Following diagram provides detailed information about the log plans and their use cases: More details about Azure Monitor Logs can be found here: Azure Monitor Logs - Azure Monitor | Microsoft Learn **Note** This blog will be focussed on switching to Auxiliary logs only. I would recommend going through our public documentation for detailed insights about feature-wise comparison for the log plans which should help you in taking right decisions for choosing the correct log plans. At this stage, I assume you’re aware about different log tiers that Azure Monitor offers and you’ve decided to switch to Auxiliary logs for high volume, low-fidelity logs. Let’s look at the high-level approach we’re going to follow to achieve this: Review the relevant tables and figure out which portion of the log can be moved to Auxiliary tier Create a DCR-based custom table which same schema as of the original table. For Ex. If you wish to split Syslog table and ingest a portion of the table into Auxiliary tier, then create a DCR-based custom table with same schema as of the Syslog table. At this point, switching table plan via UI is not possible, so I’d recommend using PowerShell script to create the DCR-based custom table. Once DCR-based custom table is created, implement DCR transformation to split the table. Configure total retention period of the Auxiliary table (this configuration will be done while creating the table) Let’s get started Use Case: In this demo, I’ll split Syslog table and route “Informational” logs to the Auxiliary table. Creating a DCR-based custom table: Previously a complex task, creating custom tables is now easy, thanks to a PowerShell script by MarkoLauren. Simply input the name of an existing table, and the script creates a DCR-based custom table with the same schema. Let’s see it in action now: Download the script locally. Update the resourceID details in this script and save it. Upload the updated script in Azure Shell. Load the file and enter the table name from which you wish to copy the schema. In my case, it's going to be "Syslog" table. Enter new table name, table type and total retention period, shown below: **Note** We highly recommend you review the PowerShell script thoroughly and do proper testing before executing it in production. We don't take any responsibility for the script. As you can see, Aux_Syslog_CL table has been created. Let’s validate in log analytics workspace > table section. Since the Auxiliary table has been created now, next step is to implement transformation logic at data collection rule level. The next step is to update the Data Collection Rule template to split the logs Since we already created custom table, we should create a transformation logic to split the Syslog table and route the logs with SeverityLevel “info” to the Auxiliary table. Let’s see how it works: Browse to Data Collection Rule blade. Open the DCR for Syslog table, click on Export template > Deploy > Edit Template as shown below: In the dataFlows section, I’ve created 2 streams for splitting the logs. Details about the streams as follows: 1 st Stream: It’s going to drop the Syslog messages where SeverityLevel is “info” and send rest of the logs to Syslog table. 2 nd Stream: It’s going to capture all Syslog messages where SeverityLevel is “info” and send the logs to Aux_Syslog_CL table. Save and deploy the updated template. Let’s see if it works as expected Browse to Azure > Microsoft Sentinel > Logs; and query the Auxiliary table to confirm if data is being ingested into this table. As we can see, the logs where SeverityLevel is “info” is being ingested in the Aux_Syslog_CL table and rest of the logs are flowing into Syslog table. Some nice cost savings are coming your way, hope this helps!Automate MDE Extension Status Checks with PowerShell
In this blog, I will dive into an automated approach for efficiently retrieving the installation status of MDE extensions (MDE.Windows or MDE.Linux) on Azure VMs safeguarded by Defender for Servers (P1 or P2) plans. This method not only streamlines the monitoring process but also ensures that your critical endpoints are continuously protected with the latest Defender capabilities. By leveraging automation, you can quickly identify any discrepancies or gaps in extension deployment, allowing for swift remediation and fortifying your organization’s security posture. Stay tuned as we explore how to seamlessly track the status of MDE extensions across your Azure VMs, ensuring robust and uninterrupted endpoint protection. Before we move forward, I’ll assume you’re already familiar with Defender for Servers’ powerful capability to automatically onboard protected servers to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. This seamless integration ensures your endpoints are swiftly equipped with industry-leading threat protection, providing a crucial layer of defense without the need for manual intervention. With this foundation in place, we can now explore how to automate the process of monitoring and verifying the installation status of MDE extensions across your Azure VMs, ensuring your security remains proactive and uninterrupted. To provide some quick context, when the Defender for Servers (P1 or P2) plan is enabled in Microsoft Defender for Cloud, the "Endpoint Protection" feature is also enabled as per default configuration. With "Endpoint Protection" enabled, Microsoft Defender for Cloud deploys the MDE.Windows or MDE.Linux extension, depending on the operating system. These extensions play a crucial role in onboarding your Azure VMs to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, ensuring they are continuously monitored and protected from emerging threats. However, there may be instances where the extensions fail to install on certain VMs due to various reasons. In these cases, it's crucial to identify the root cause of the failure in order to effectively plan and implement the necessary remediation actions. You can leverage Azure Resource Graph query or PowerShell to fetch this information. In this blog, we will focus on PowerShell approach to get the data. Let’s get started I’ve developed an interactive PowerShell script that allows you to easily retrieve data for MDE.Windows or MDE.Linux extensions. Below are the detailed steps to follow: Download the script locally from the GitHub Repo. Update the output file path as per your environment (line #84 in the script) and save the file. Sign-in to Azure Portal. Launch Cloud Shell. Upload the script in Cloud Shell that you’ve downloaded locally Load the uploaded script and read the “Disclaimer” section. If you agree then proceed further, if you disagree then type “no” and the script will terminate. The output is stored in CSV format, which you should download to further review the “Message” column detail. In “Manage Files” section, click on Download and provide the output file path to download the CSV report as shown below: Once the CSV file is downloaded, you can review the detailed information about the failure message of the extensions. Including the PowerShell script for reference: # Disclaimer Write-Host "************************* DISCLAIMER *************************" Write-Host "The author of this script provides it 'as is' without any guarantees or warranties of any kind." Write-Host "By using this script, you acknowledge that you are solely responsible for any damage, data loss, or other issues that may arise from its execution." Write-Host "It is your responsibility to thoroughly test the script in a controlled environment before deploying it in a production setting." Write-Host "The author will not be held liable for any consequences resulting from the use of this script. Use at your own risk." Write-Host "***************************************************************" Write-Host "" # Prompt the user for consent after displaying the disclaimer $consent = Read-Host -Prompt "Do you consent to proceed with the script? (Type 'yes' to continue)" # If the user does not consent, exit the script if ($consent -ne "yes") { Write-Host "You did not consent. Exiting the script." exit } # If consent is given, continue with the rest of the script Write-Host "Proceeding with the script..." # Get all VMs in the subscription $vms = Get-AzVM # Initialize an array to collect the output $outputData = @() # Loop through each VM and check extensions $vms | ForEach-Object { $vm = $_ # Get the VM status with extensions $vmStatus = Get-AzVM -ResourceGroupName $vm.ResourceGroupName -Name $vm.Name -Status $extensions = ($vmStatus).Extensions | Where-Object { $_.Name -eq "MDE.Windows" -or $_.Name -eq "MDE.Linux" } # Get the VM OS type (Windows/Linux) $osType = $vm.StorageProfile.OsDisk.OsType if ($extensions.Count -eq 0) { # If no MDE extensions found, append a message indicating they are missing $outputData += [PSCustomObject]@{ "Subscription Name" = (Get-AzContext).Subscription.Name "VM Name" = $vm.Name "VM OS" = $osType "Extension Name" = "MDE Extensions Missing" "Display Status" = "N/A" "Message" = "MDE.Windows or MDE.Linux extensions are missing." } } else { # Process the extensions if found $extensions | ForEach-Object { # Get the message and parse it into a single line $message = $_.Statuses.Message # Remove line breaks or newlines and replace them with spaces $singleLineMessage = $message -replace "`r`n|`n|`r", " " # If the message is JSON, we can parse it (optional) try { $parsedMessage = $singleLineMessage | ConvertFrom-Json # Convert the JSON back to a single-line string $singleLineMessage = $parsedMessage | ConvertTo-Json -Compress } catch { # If it's not JSON, keep the message as is } # Create a custom object for the table output with the single-line message $outputData += [PSCustomObject]@{ "Subscription Name" = (Get-AzContext).Subscription.Name "VM Name" = $vm.Name "VM OS" = $osType "Extension Name" = $_.Name "Display Status" = $_.Statuses.DisplayStatus "Message" = $singleLineMessage } } } } # Output to the console in a formatted table $outputData | Format-Table -Property "Subscription Name", "VM Name", "VM OS", "Extension Name", "Display Status", "Message" # Specify the CSV file path $csvFilePath = "/home/abhishek/MDEExtReport/mdeextreport_output.csv" # Update the path to where you want to store the CSV # Check if the directory exists $directory = [System.IO.Path]::GetDirectoryName($csvFilePath) if (-not (Test-Path -Path $directory)) { # Create the directory if it doesn't exist Write-Host "Directory does not exist. Creating directory: $directory" New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force -Path $directory } # Check if the file exists and create it if missing if (-not (Test-Path -Path $csvFilePath)) { Write-Host "File does not exist. Creating file: $csvFilePath" } # Save the output to a CSV file locally $outputData | Export-Csv -Path $csvFilePath -NoTypeInformation Write-Host "The report has been saved to: $csvFilePath" Disclaimer: The author of this script provides it 'as is' without any guarantees or warranties of any kind. By using this script, you acknowledge that you are solely responsible for any damage, data loss, or other issues that may arise from its execution. It is your responsibility to thoroughly test the script in a controlled environment before deploying it in a production setting. The author will not be held liable for any consequences resulting from the use of this script. Use at your own risk. I trust this script will significantly reduce the effort required to investigate the root cause of MDE extension installation failures, streamlining the troubleshooting process and enhancing operational efficiency.Ingesting custom application logs Text/JSON file to Microsoft Sentinel
This blog is in continuation to my previous blog on Demystifying Log Ingestion API where I discussed on ingesting custom log files to Microsoft Sentinel via Log Ingestion API approach. In this blog post I will delve into ingesting custom application logs in Text/JSON format to Microsoft Sentinel. Note: For my demo purposes I will use the log in JSON format. First, lets start with WHY is this important. Many applications and services will log information to a JSON/Text files instead of standard logging services such as Windows Event log or Syslog. There are several use cases where custom application logs are mandatory to be monitored and that’s why this integration becomes crucial part of SOC monitoring. How to implement this integration? Custom application logs in Text/JSON format can be collected with Azure Monitor Agent and stored in a Log Analytics workspace with data collected from other sources. There are two ways to do it: Creating DCR-based custom table and link it with Data Collection Rule and Data Collection Endpoint. Leverage Custom logs via AMA content hub solution. I will discuss both approaches in this blog. Let’s see it in action now. Leveraging DCR-based custom table to ingest custom application logs Using this approach, we will first create a DCR-based custom table and link it with DCR and DCE. Prerequisites for this approach: Log Analytics workspace where you have at least contributor rights. A data collection endpoint (DCE) in the same region as the Log Analytics workspace. See How to set up data collection endpoints based on your deployment for details. Either a new or existing DCR described in Collect data with Azure Monitor Agent. Basic Operations: The following diagram shows the basic operation of collecting log data from a json file. The agent watches for any log files that match a specified name pattern on the local disk. Each entry in the log is collected and sent to Azure Monitor. The incoming stream defined by the user is used to parse the log data into columns. A default transformation is used if the schema of the incoming stream matches the schema of the target table. Detailed steps as follows: Browse to Log Analytics Workspace > Settings > Tables > New custom log (DCR-based) Enter the table name, please note the suffix _CL will be automatically added. Use existing or create a new DCR and link a DCE. Upload the sample log file in JSON format to create table schema In my use case, I’ve created few columns like TimeGenerated, FilePath and Computer using the transformation query mentioned below: source | extend TimeGenerated = todatetime(Time), FilePath = tostring('C:\\Custom Application\\v.1.*.json'), Computer = tostring('DC-WinSrv22') Review and create the table. Go to the Data Collection Rule > Resources and Add the Application Server and link it with the DCE. If all configurations are correct, then in few minutes the data should populate in the custom table as shown below: Note: Ensure that the Application Server is reporting to the correct Log Analytics Workspace and the DCR, DCE are linked to the Server. Details of DCRs associated with a VM can be fetched from the following PowerShell Script: Get-AzDatacollectionRuleAssociation -TargetResourceId {ResourceID} Please note, 'Custom JSON log' data source configuration is currently unavailable through the Portal, you can use Azure CLI or ARM template for the configurations. However, ‘Custom Text Logs’ data source can be configured from Azure Portal (DCR>Data Sources) Leveraging Custom logs via AMA Data Connector We’ve recently released a content hub solution for ingesting custom logs via AMA. This approach is straightforward as the required columns like TimeGenerated and RawData gets created automatically. Detailed steps as follows: Browse to Microsoft Sentinel > Content Hub > Custom Logs AMA and install this solution Go to Manage > Open the connector page > Create Data Collection Rule Enter the Rule name, target VM and specify if you wish to create a new table. If so, provide a table name. You’ll also need to provide the file pattern (wildcards are supported) along with transformation logic (if applicable). In my use case, I am not using any transformation. Once DCR is created, wait for some time and validate if logs are streaming or not. If all the configurations are correct, then you’ll see the logs in the table as shown below: Please note, since we have used DCR-based custom tables we can switch the table plan to Basic if needed. Additionally, DCR-based custom tables support transformation so irrelevant data can be dropped or the incoming data can be split to multiple tables. References: Collect logs from a JSON file with Azure Monitor Agent - Azure Monitor | Microsoft Learn Collect logs from text files with the Azure Monitor Agent and ingest to Microsoft Sentinel - AMA | Microsoft Learn Demystifying Log Ingestion API | Microsoft Community Hub Save ingestion costs by splitting logs into multiple tables and opting for the basic tier! | Microsoft Community Hub Workspace & DCR Transformation Simplified | Microsoft Community HubBreak the 30,000 Rows Limit with Advanced Hunting API!
In this blog post, I will explain how to utilize advanced hunting APIs to bypass the 30,000 rows limit in Defender XDR's advanced hunting feature. Before we delve into the topic, let’s understand what is an Advanced Hunting in Defender XDR and what problem we are trying to solve. Advanced Hunting in Defender XDR (Extended Detection and Response) is a powerful feature in Microsoft Defender that allows security professionals to query and analyse large volumes of raw data to uncover potential threats across an organization's environment. It provides a flexible query interface where users can write custom queries using Kusto Query Language (KQL) to search through data collected from various sources, such as endpoints, emails, cloud apps, and more. Key features of Advanced Hunting in Defender XDR include: Custom Queries: You can create complex queries to search for specific activities, patterns, or anomalies across different security data sources. Deep Data Analysis: It allows for deep analysis of raw data, going beyond the pre-defined alerts and detections to identify potential threats, vulnerabilities, or suspicious behaviours that might not be immediately visible. Cross-Platform Search: Advanced Hunting enables users to query across a wide range of data sources, including Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Defender for Identity, Defender for Office 365, and Defender for Cloud Apps. Automated Response: It supports creating automated response actions based on the findings of advanced hunts, helping to quickly mitigate threats. Integration with Threat Intelligence: You can enrich your hunting queries with external threat intelligence to correlate indicators of compromise (IOCs) and identify malicious activities. Visualizations and Insights: Results from hunting queries can be visualized to help spot trends and patterns, making it easier to investigate and understand the data. Advanced Hunting is a valuable tool for proactive threat detection, investigation, and response within Defender XDR, giving security teams more flexibility and control over the security posture of their organization. Advanced Hunting quotas and service limits To keep the service performant and responsive, advanced hunting sets various quotas and usage parameters (also known as "service limits"). By design, each Advanced Hunting query can fetch up to 30,000 rows. Refer our public documentation for more information about the service limitations in Advanced Hunting. In this blog, we will focus on leveraging Advanced Hunting APIs to bypass the 30,000 rows service limit of Advanced Hunting. Usually when the query result exceeds 30,000 rows it’s recommended to: Try refining/optimizing the query by introducing filters to separate it into distinct segments, and then merge the results into a comprehensive report. Leverage Advanced Hunting API as it can fetch up to 100,000 rows: Advanced Hunting API - Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Microsoft Learn We’re going to focus on the second approach here. Let's dive deeper into the process of fetching up to 100,000 records using the Advanced Hunting API. Login to Microsoft Defender XDR (https://security.microsoft.com/) Browse to Endpoints > Partners and APIs > API Explorer Submit a POST query along with the JSON with the Advanced Hunting query. POST https://api.securitycenter.microsoft.com/api/advancedqueries/run Let’s take an example of an AH query to fetch details about devices with open CVEs details. Sample Advanced Hunting query: DeviceTvmSoftwareVulnerabilities | join kind=inner ( DeviceTvmSoftwareVulnerabilitiesKB | extend CveId = tostring(CveId) // Cast CveId to string in the second leg of the join | project CveId, VulnerabilitySeverityLevel, CvssScore, PublishedDate, VulnerabilityDescription ) on CveId | project DeviceName, OSPlatform, OSVersion, CveId, VulnerabilitySeverityLevel, CvssScore, PublishedDate, VulnerabilityDescription, RecommendedSecurityUpdate Note: The advanced hunting query in the JSON template should be written in a single line. Let’s see it in action now. My JSON template is as follows: { "Query":"DeviceTvmSoftwareVulnerabilities| join kind=inner (DeviceTvmSoftwareVulnerabilitiesKB | extend CveId = tostring(CveId) | project CveId, VulnerabilitySeverityLevel, CvssScore, PublishedDate, VulnerabilityDescription) on CveId | project DeviceName, OSPlatform, OSVersion, CveId, VulnerabilitySeverityLevel, CvssScore, PublishedDate, VulnerabilityDescription, RecommendedSecurityUpdate" } Execute the query and it returns a response (as shown below) Copy the response; save it as a JSON file locally Use PowerShell to convert JSON to CSV format. For Ex: Following PowerShell script can be used to convert the JSON file to CSV report: Get-Content "<Location of JSON file>" | ConvertFrom-Json | select -Expand Results | ConvertTo-Csv -NoTypeInformation | Out-File "<Location to save CSV file>" -Encoding ASCII The CSV report should have up to 100,000 records. I would also recommend going through the limitations of Advanced Hunting APIs as well: Advanced Hunting API - Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Microsoft Learn References: Advanced Hunting APIs: Advanced Hunting API - Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Microsoft Learn Advanced Hunting Overview: Overview - Advanced hunting - Microsoft Defender XDR | Microsoft Learn
