Conditional Access - Block all M365 apps private Mobile Device
Hello, Ive try to block all private mobile phone from accessing all apps from m365, but it wont work. Im testing it at the moment with one test.user@ I create a CA rule: Cloud Apps Include: All Cloud Apps Exclude: Microsoft Intune Enrollment Exclude: Microsoft Intune Conditions Device Platforms: Include: Android Include: iOS Include: Windows Phone Filter for Devices: Devices matching the rule: Exclude filtered devices from Policy device.deviceOwnership -eq "Company" Client Apps Include: All 4 points Access Controls Block Access ----------------------- I take a fresh "private" installed mobile android phone. Download the Outlook App and log in with the test.user@ in the outlook app and everything work fine. What im doing wrong? Pls help. PeterRestrict some devices
Hi All I hope you are well. Anyway, I'm looking for some advice. We have identified some Intune enrolled, Entra ID joined devices that may be security risks (malware) and would like to restrict these devices from accessing things like M365 apps, Azure VPN etc etc. What's the best way to achieve this? Conditional Access and target a group with the devices as members? Info appreciated
Exclusion of Copilot App (for O365) from Conditional Access Policies does not work
Hi, we've built a Conditional Access Policy in EntraID that forces MFA for all Cloud Apps. We want to exclude "Microsoft 365 Copilot"/ "Copilot App" so no Reauthentication is necessary for Copilot in the frame of accessing O365 content. Exclusion has been made for a range of identified Copilot applications that are shown in Sign-in logs. However, reauthentication still pops up. No other conditional access policy is applied. It's this specific policy that requires reauthentication. What's the reason why the exclusion does not work? Is there something else necessary to be taken into consideration so the exclusion works fine? Many thanks in advance!Exclusion of Microsoft Edge Browser from Conditional Access Policies does not work
Hi, we've built a Conditional Access Policy in EntraID that forces MFA for all Cloud Apps. We want to exclude Microsoft Edge Browser so no Reauthentication is necessary for MS Edge Browser. Exclusion has been made for the "Microsoft Edge" application with the following App ID: ecd6b820-32c2-49b6-98a6-444530e5a77a However, reauthentication still pops up. No other conditional access policy is applied. It's this specific policy that requires reauthentication. What's the reason why the exclusion does not work? Is there something else necessary to be taken into consideration so the exclusion works fine? Many thanks in advance!Microsoft Entra Internet Access for iOS in Public Preview!
With the latest update to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint on iOS, Organisations licensed for Microsoft Entra Suite or Microsoft Entra Internet Access will have access to Microsoft's Secure Web Gateway (SWG) and traffic forwarding for HTTP/HTTPS traffic, with support for Web-Content Filtering. This has been a huge win for iOS Mobile Security. Previously, Defender for Endpoint on iOS has supported Phishing Protection, M365 Traffic, and Entra Private Access Traffic. Combined with Global Secure Access Threat Intelligence, which consumes indicators from Microsoft Intelligent Security Graph (ISG), Organisations can implement granular internet access controls on iOS devices with integrated, context aware protection against malicious threats. Excited to hear what you think! Release notes are available here👉 Microsoft Entra in Action: From Conditional Access to Identity Protection
One of the areas I’m most passionate about is identity-driven security. Microsoft Entra makes it possible to apply Zero Trust principles directly at the identity layer. ⚡ Conditional Access – the backbone of modern access policies. 👤 Privileged Identity Management (PIM) – ensuring just-in-time, least privilege for admins. 🛡️ Identity Protection – risk-based policies to stop compromised sign-ins in real time. In my labs, I’ve seen how these features transform security posture without adding friction for users. Coming soon: - Step-by-step breakdown of a risky user detection scenario. - A visual guide to Conditional Access controls for critical apps. Would love to exchange insights with others experimenting in this space — what Entra features are you finding most impactful? #MicrosoftEntra | #ConditionalAccess | #IdentityProtection | #MicrosoftLearn | #PerparimLabs
Unable to add Azure Virtual Desktop Client Enterprise App to Conditional Access
We currently use conditional access to allow certain contractors to sign into VMs, and from these VMs, access other MS Apps. Currently we block all applications from outside the VM ip range, but exclude the Virtual desktop applications to allow the users to do the initial signin to the VM. When contractors are using the Virtual Desktop app, it seems to work ok. However, recently when signing in via the browser only and launching from there, the conditional access rule is blocking them as the application ID isn't in the exclude list, and we are unable to add it: a85cf173-4192-42f8-81fa-777a763e6e2c The documentation: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-desktop/set-up-mfa?tabs=avd shows that web signins may originate from this application ID, but without the ability to add this to the exclusion apps, we cannot find another workaround that allows access via the browser. I also tried adding this app in to the policy via GraphAPI, but I get an error saying that this first party application isn't allowed. I need to know if there is another workaround or if Microsoft are planning to add this to the CA compatibility list? I'm not sure why some of the Virtual desktop apps are there but this one is not.Microsoft Intune Company Portal for Linux and Conditional Access Issue
Greetings everyone, I have the following scenario implemented regarding conditional access: Rule#1: For pilotuser1, for all cloud apps, for all platforms --> require MFA Rule#2: For pilotuser1, for all cloud apps except Microsoft Intune Enrollment and Microsoft Intune, for all platforms --> Require Device marked as compliant This should allow me to enroll to Intune successfully a non-enrolled device and require the device compliance for the other workloads. For Windows it works just fine. The problem lies with Linux. Following the instructions on Enroll a Linux device in Intune | Microsoft Learn & Get the Microsoft Intune app for Linux | Microsoft Learn I installed Intune App and Edge (Version 109.0.1518.52 (Official build) (64-bit)) on a VM with Ubuntu 22.04. I open the Intune App and try to sign in: First step is to Register the Device on Azure AD, it goes without a problem --> On the next stage I get the following and press continue: At this stage Microsoft Edge opens and I sign in successfully but the Intune App throws an error: The sign in logs on Azure AD show that even though I excluded Intune Enrollment from the CA policy, it is not enough. Sign-in error code: 530003 Failure reason: Your device is required to be managed to access this resource. Additional Details: The requested resource can only be accessed using a compliant device. The user is either using a device not managed by a Mobile-Device-Management (MDM) agent like Intune, or it's using an application that doesn't support device authentication. The user could enroll their devices with an approved MDM provider, or use a different app to sign in, or find the app vendor and ask them to update their app. More details available at https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/active-directory/active-directory-conditional-access-device-remediation Application: Microsoft Intune Company Portal for Linux Application ID: b743a22d-6705-4147-8670-d92fa515ee2b Resource : Microsoft Graph Resource ID: 00000003-0000-0000-c000-000000000000 Client app: Mobile Apps and Desktop clients Client credential type: None Resource service principal ID: 01989347-a263-48ef-a8d7-583ee83db9a2 Token issuer type: Azure AD Apparently something is different in the enrollment process of Linux because I had no issues with Windows 10 enrollment . Any thoughts on the subject would be appreciated. Kind Regards, Panos
Conflict status after having 2 Local user group membership Policy
Hello, I have an issue with applying two "Local User Group Membership" policies on a PC. The Intune policy report shows a conflict between having two "Local User Group Membership" policies despite having different configurations. For example, one is a Global Policy, which applies an admin privilege to all PCs, and the other one is more specific to a certain group, and it is just about giving remote access to the PCs on this group. So, my question is, why does Intune mark these two policies as a conflict of each other? If it is not possible to have two "Local User Group Membership" policies applying to the PC. Is there a way to have a global policy for admin users on the PC and one more private policy for remote user access using "Local User Group Membership"?
