S2D 4k vs 64k which one should i choose?

%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-100444%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ES2D%204k%20vs%2064k%20which%20one%20should%20i%20choose%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-100444%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHave%20read%20on%20numerous%20blogs%20a%20potential%20performance%20impact%20when%20using%204k%20block%20size%20for%20volumes%20in%20S2D%20vs%2064k.%20%26nbsp%3BWhat%20does%20microsoft%20recommend%20for%20optimal%20performance%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-100453%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20S2D%204k%20vs%2064k%20which%20one%20should%20i%20choose%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-100453%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EYes%2C%20thank%20you%20for%20the%20quick%20answer.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-100451%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERE%3A%20S2D%204k%20vs%2064k%20which%20one%20should%20i%20choose%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-100451%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EIs%20this%20enough%3F%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fblogs.technet.microsoft.com%2Ffilecab%2F2017%2F01%2F13%2Fcluster-size-recommendations-for-refs-and-ntfs%2F%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fblogs.technet.microsoft.com%2Ffilecab%2F2017%2F01%2F13%2Fcluster-size-recommendations-for-refs-and-ntfs%2F%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-100449%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERE%3A%20S2D%204k%20vs%2064k%20which%20one%20should%20i%20choose%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-100449%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EGood%20question.%20S2D%20will%20work%20with%20either%2C%20but%20storage%20spaces%20is%20optimized%20for%204k.%20It%20does%20many%20operations%20on%20a%20block%20basis%20and%20in%204k%20chunks%20so%20if%20they%20are%2064k%20blocks%20it%20just%20means%20reading%20in%20and%20writing%20more%20data%20than%20necessary.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
New Contributor

Have read on numerous blogs a potential performance impact when using 4k block size for volumes in S2D vs 64k.  What does microsoft recommend for optimal performance?

3 Replies
Good question. S2D will work with either, but storage spaces is optimized for 4k. It does many operations on a block basis and in 4k chunks so if they are 64k blocks it just means reading in and writing more data than necessary.
Yes, thank you for the quick answer.