Forum Discussion
Any potential problems with mixed OS versions for Active Directory PDC?
The other new functionalities - such as PAM (Server 2016 but with forest functional level 2012 R2) or Protected Users (domain functional level 2012 R2) - have to be explicitly lit up by deliberately increasing the functional levels. Until that happens, no behavioural changes occur.
Exchange Server manages its own settings, including schema extensions and permissions on the default and configuration naming contexts.
There's no danger to Exchange Server in this scenario. There's anecdotally (as much as you can gauge such things from forums such as these) more danger to Exchange from Exchange itself when running cumulative updates.
Cheers,
Lain
- LainRobertsonMay 12, 2022Silver Contributor
Yes, you're 100% correct about that, but that doesn't explicitly preclude mixing Active Directory operating system versions carte blanche.
While we don't know Ted_Mittelstaedt's client's Exchange 2016 cumulative update level, if it's within the supported range of [n] to [n-1] (i.e. CU23 or 22) ) then they're supported to work against Windows Server 2019 domain controllers, which is as far as the client can go for now from what Ted said anyway.
That being the case, there's no formal (with the caveat on us not knowing the Exchange CU level) reason to limit the replacement of the 2008 R2 DC to Server 2016. The only outcome would be cutting down platform supportability by years.
So long as everything lines up within the supportability matrix (included below for Ted's benefit), mixed domain controllers is fully supported.
Exchange Server supportability matrix | Microsoft Docs
Cheers,
Lain