Announcing the availability of unified labeling management in the Security & Compliance Center

Published Sep 26 2018 08:00 AM 52.7K Views
Microsoft

Companies across all different industries and regulatory environments have a need to manage the lifecycle of their data – keeping sensitive data secure and ensuring that their data and records are governed in accordance with compliance requirements – all the while ensuring end-user productivity isn’t hindered. More than ever, users share and move their data across devices, apps, and services. This has made protecting important data even more challenging.

 

In our Information Protection blog we announced a new unified labeling experience in the Security & Compliance Center. With unified labels, you have a single place to manage sensitivity labels that help classify and protect your sensitive data, as well as manage retention labels that help govern the lifecycle of your data (e.g. data retention and expiration). With this update also comes interoperability between Azure Information Protection labels and labels in Office 365. This means, for example, if you have content labeled by Azure Information Protection, you won’t need to reclassify or relabel your content. With unified labels, you can assign multiple labels to a single file, helping ensure your sensitive information is protected while it’s also controlled according to your governance needs.

 

MIPlabelSCC.png

The new unified label management experience in the Security & Compliance Center

 

Getting started with sensitivity labels

Getting started with sensitivity labels is an easy two-step process. First, you want to establish your taxonomy for defining different levels of sensitive content. You should use common names or terms that make sense to your end-users. For example, many customers start with labels such as Personal, Public, General, Confidential, and Highly Confidential. Then, configure the protection settings you want associated with each label. For example, lower sensitivity content (e.g. a “General” label) might have content watermarking or header/footers applied, while higher sensitivity content (e.g. a “Confidential” label) may have access controls and encryption applied to ensure only privileged users can access it. After you define your organization’s labels, you “publish” a label policy that controls which labels users can assign to their content – and this also makes labels available in Office apps and other services. More detailed instructions are available directly in the product help at https://aka.ms/manageMIP.

 

Guidance for customers using Azure Information Protection labels

The new unified labelling is designed to interoperate with Azure Information Protection labels. If you have content that’s already been labeled by Azure Information Protection, you won’t need to re-classify or re-label it. We have made it easy to merge and re-use your existing Azure Information Protection labels with the new unified labelling in the Security & Compliance Center.

 

Azure Information Protection users are currently able to classify and label content on Windows using the Azure Information Protection add-in for Office. Customers have long requested the need for classification and labelling on other platform, and today we’re announcing a public preview for existing Azure Information Protection customers – the ability to migrate Azure Information Protection labels to the unified labeling in the Security & Compliance Center. Get started today with the preview versions of the Office apps that support native labeling (as described in our Information Protection blog). To prevent confusion, we recommend you avoid creating labels in the Security & Compliance Center. Our documentation has important information and some specific caveats – you can find out more on the Azure Information Protection portal. If you are not yet ready to migrate your production tenants to unified labels then there is no cause for concern; for the moment, your users can continue using the Azure Information Protection client and admins can use the Azure portal for management. The new reporting and analytics capabilities in Azure Information Protection are also available in public preview in the Azure portal.

 

Together, these updates for Azure Information Protection represent another step towards a complete data protection strategy. Get started today!

 

The Microsoft Information Protection team

34 Comments
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-262492%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EAnnouncing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Center%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-262492%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ECompanies%20across%20all%20different%20industries%20and%20regulatory%20environments%20have%20a%20need%20to%20manage%20the%20lifecycle%20of%20their%20data%20%E2%80%93%20keeping%20sensitive%20data%20secure%20and%20ensuring%20that%20their%20data%20and%20records%20are%20governed%20in%20accordance%20with%20compliance%20requirements%20%E2%80%93%20all%20the%20while%20ensuring%20end-user%20productivity%20isn%E2%80%99t%20hindered.%20More%20than%20ever%2C%20users%20share%20and%20move%20their%20data%20across%20devices%2C%20apps%2C%20and%20services.%20This%20has%20made%20protecting%20important%20data%20even%20more%20challenging.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EIn%20our%20Information%20Protection%20%3CSPAN%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2FMIP-Ignite2018%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Eblog%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%20we%20announced%20a%20new%20unified%20labeling%20experience%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Center.%20With%20unified%20labels%2C%20you%20have%20a%20single%20place%20to%20manage%20sensitivity%20labels%20that%20help%20classify%20and%20protect%20your%20sensitive%20data%2C%20as%20well%20as%20manage%20retention%20labels%20that%20help%20govern%20the%20lifecycle%20of%20your%20data%20(e.g.%20data%20retention%20and%20expiration).%20With%20this%20update%20also%20comes%20interoperability%20between%20Azure%20Information%20Protection%20labels%20and%20labels%20in%20Office%20365.%20This%20means%2C%20for%20example%2C%20if%20you%20have%20content%20labeled%20by%20Azure%20Information%20Protection%2C%20you%20won%E2%80%99t%20need%20to%20reclassify%20or%20relabel%20your%20content.%20With%20unified%20labels%2C%20you%20can%20assign%20multiple%20labels%20to%20a%20single%20file%2C%20helping%20ensure%20your%20sensitive%20information%20is%20protected%20while%20it%E2%80%99s%20also%20controlled%20according%20to%20your%20governance%20needs.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-center%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20999px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F54522i0F44650E23AA8658%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20alt%3D%22MIPlabelSCC.png%22%20title%3D%22MIPlabelSCC.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CEM%3EThe%20new%20unified%20label%20management%20experience%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Center%3C%2FEM%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CH2%20id%3D%22toc-hId-1650185983%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId-1704615936%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId-1704615936%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId-1704615936%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId-1704615936%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId-1704615936%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId-1704615936%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId-1704615936%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId-1704615936%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FH2%3E%0A%3CH2%20id%3D%22toc-hId--901970978%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId--847541025%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId--847541025%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId--847541025%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId--847541025%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId--847541025%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId--847541025%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId--847541025%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId--847541025%22%3EGetting%20started%20with%20sensitivity%20labels%3C%2FH2%3E%0A%3CP%3EGetting%20started%20with%20sensitivity%20labels%20is%20an%20easy%20two-step%20process.%20First%2C%20you%20want%20to%20establish%20your%20taxonomy%20for%20defining%20different%20levels%20of%20sensitive%20content.%20You%20should%20use%20common%20names%20or%20terms%20that%20make%20sense%20to%20your%20end-users.%20For%20example%2C%20many%20customers%20start%20with%20labels%20such%20as%20Personal%2C%20Public%2C%20General%2C%20Confidential%2C%20and%20Highly%20Confidential.%20Then%2C%20configure%20the%20protection%20settings%20you%20want%20associated%20with%20each%20label.%20For%20example%2C%20lower%20sensitivity%20content%20(e.g.%20a%20%E2%80%9CGeneral%E2%80%9D%20label)%20might%20have%20content%20watermarking%20or%20header%2Ffooters%20applied%2C%20while%20higher%20sensitivity%20content%20(e.g.%20a%20%E2%80%9CConfidential%E2%80%9D%20label)%20may%20have%20access%20controls%20and%20encryption%20applied%20to%20ensure%20only%20privileged%20users%20can%20access%20it.%20After%20you%20define%20your%20organization%E2%80%99s%20labels%2C%20you%20%E2%80%9Cpublish%E2%80%9D%20a%20label%20policy%20that%20controls%20which%20labels%20users%20can%20assign%20to%20their%20content%20%E2%80%93%20and%20this%20also%20makes%20labels%20available%20in%20Office%20apps%20and%20other%20services.%20More%20detailed%20instructions%20are%20available%20directly%20in%20the%20product%20help%20at%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2FmanageMIP%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2FmanageMIP%3C%2FA%3E.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CH2%20id%3D%22toc-hId-840839357%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId-895269310%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId-895269310%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId-895269310%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId-895269310%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId-895269310%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId-895269310%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId-895269310%22%20id%3D%22toc-hId-895269310%22%3EGuidance%20for%20customers%20using%20Azure%20Information%20Protection%20labels%3C%2FH2%3E%0A%3CP%3EThe%20new%20unified%20labelling%20is%20designed%20to%20interoperate%20with%20Azure%20Information%20Protection%20labels.%20If%20you%20have%20content%20that%E2%80%99s%20already%20been%20labeled%20by%20Azure%20Information%20Protection%2C%20you%20won%E2%80%99t%20need%20to%20re-classify%20or%20re-label%20it.%20We%20have%20made%20it%20easy%20to%20merge%20and%20re-use%20your%20existing%20Azure%20Information%20Protection%20labels%20with%20the%20new%20unified%20labelling%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Center.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EAzure%20Information%20Protection%20users%20are%20currently%20able%20to%20classify%20and%20label%20content%20on%20Windows%20using%20the%20Azure%20Information%20Protection%20add-in%20for%20Office.%20Customers%20have%20long%20requested%20the%20need%20for%20classification%20and%20labelling%20on%20other%20platform%2C%20and%20today%20we%E2%80%99re%20announcing%20a%20public%20preview%20for%20existing%20Azure%20Information%20Protection%20customers%20%E2%80%93%20the%20ability%20to%20migrate%20Azure%20Information%20Protection%20labels%20to%20the%20unified%20labeling%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Center.%20Get%20started%20today%20with%20the%20preview%20versions%20of%20the%20Office%20apps%20that%20support%20native%20labeling%20(as%20described%20in%20our%20Information%20Protection%20%3CSPAN%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2FMIP-Ignite2018%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Eblog%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E).%20To%20prevent%20confusion%2C%20we%20recommend%20you%20avoid%20creating%20labels%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Center.%20Our%20%3CA%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Faipmigration%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Edocumentation%3C%2FA%3E%20has%20important%20information%20and%20some%20specific%20caveats%20%E2%80%93%20you%20can%20find%20out%20more%20on%20the%20Azure%20Information%20Protection%20portal.%20If%20you%20are%20not%20yet%20ready%20to%20migrate%20your%20production%20tenants%20to%20unified%20labels%20then%20there%20is%20no%20cause%20for%20concern%3B%20for%20the%20moment%2C%20your%20users%20can%20continue%20using%20the%20Azure%20Information%20Protection%20client%20and%20admins%20can%20use%20the%20Azure%20portal%20for%20management.%20The%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fazure%2Finformation-protection%2Freports-aip%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Enew%20reporting%20and%20analytics%20capabilities%3C%2FA%3E%20in%20Azure%20Information%20Protection%20are%20also%20available%20in%20public%20preview%20in%20the%20Azure%20portal.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ETogether%2C%20these%20updates%20for%20Azure%20Information%20Protection%20represent%20another%20step%20towards%20a%20complete%20data%20protection%20strategy.%20Get%20started%20today!%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EThe%20Microsoft%20Information%20Protection%20team%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-353924%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-353924%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3EThanks%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F65194%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Mas%20Libman%3C%2FA%3E%3CSPAN%3E%20that%20is%20good%20news%2C%20no%20we%20are%20not%20yet%20using%20retention%20labels%20and%20therefore%20not%20using%20tips%20in%20SharePoint%2C%20they%20are%20however%20very%20useful%20and%20we%20have%20plans%20to%20use%20them%20in%20the%20near%20future%20although%20I%20think%20our%20users%20would%20prefer%20to%20set%20retention%20within%20the%20document%20like%20sensitivity.%26nbsp%3B%20We%20do%20use%20DLP%20rules%20which%20are%20great%20with%20mail%20tips%20(bit%20slow%20to%20appear%20sometimes!).%26nbsp%3B%20We%20currently%20do%20not%20allow%20sharing%20externally%20with%20SharePoint%20so%20tips%20in%20SharePoint%20have%20been%20less%20important%20again%20we%20may%20look%20to%20change%20this%20in%20the%20future.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-353649%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-353649%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThanks%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F65194%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Mas%20Libman%3C%2FA%3E.%20I've%20been%20advised%20that%20there%20will%20be%20another%20preview%20of%20the%20unified%20labelling%20client%20(Windows)%20in%20Fed-March%20with%20GA%20around%20April.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EStill%20awaiting%20the%20rest%20of%20the%20features%20that%20are%20yet%20to%20come%20to%20make%20it%20a%20uniform%20experience.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAlso%20noticed%20that%20content%20that%20has%20been%20labelled%20isn't%20being%20picked%20up%20in%20the%20Data%20Governance%20dashboard%20-%20How%20labels%20were%20applied.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-353628%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-353628%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Shane%20-%20Office%20on%20Mac%2C%20iOS%20and%20Android%20is%20with%20native%20labeling%20capabilities%20are%20currently%20available%20in%20%22Prod%22!%20here's%20a%20link%20to%20the%20blog%20announcement%3A%26nbsp%3B%3CFONT%20style%3D%22background-color%3A%20%23ffffff%3B%22%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2FSecurity-Privacy-and-Compliance%2FNew-labeling-capabilities-in-Office-apps-helps-you-protect%2Fba-p%2F325771%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2FSecurity-Privacy-and-Compliance%2FNew-labeling-capabilities-in-Office-apps-helps-you-protect%2Fba-p%2F325771%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FFONT%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-353624%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-353624%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThanks%20Andrea%20-%20our%20goal%20is%20to%20allow%20you%20to%20use%20labels%20in%20DLP%20consistently%2Funiformly%20across%20Office%20365%2C%20and%20our%20upcoming%20investments%20will%20address%20your%20asks%20around%20visibility%20-%20who%5Cwhen%20is%20labeled%20content%20shared%20-%20as%20well%20as%20the%20ability%20to%20trigger%20tips%20in%20Outlook.%20Are%20you%20using%20Retention%20labels%20to%20show%20Policy%20tips%20in%20SPO%20currently%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-352964%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-352964%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EAs%20i%20can%20see%2C%20currently%20unified%20labels%20do%20support%20auto%20classification%20for%20retention%20labels.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIs%20there%20any%20update%20on%20when%20the%20%22Auto%20Classification%20feature%22%20will%20be%20available%20for%20%3CSTRONG%3E%3CU%3Esensitivity%3C%2FU%3E%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20labels%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EFor%20a%20client%20we%20consider%20to%20make%20use%20of%20the%20unified%20labels%2C%20but%20only%20when%20auto%20classification%20on%20sensitivity%20labels%20is%20general%20available....%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-341223%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-341223%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThanks%20Mas%20that%20is%20good%20news!%20We%20have%20migrated%20our%20AIP%20labels%20to%20O365%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20and%20have%20been%20testing%20with%20the%20Unified%20Client.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20was%20thinking%20that%20I%20could%20then%20create%20a%20DLP%20policy%20using%20them.%26nbsp%3B%20For%20example%20on%20a%20'Secret'%20sensitivity%20label%20it%20would%20be%20great%20to%20have%20a%20Mail%2FPolicy%20tip%20warning%20that%20a%20document%20(word%2C%20excel%2C%20pdf)%20is%20being%20emailed%2Fshared%20externally%20or%20internally%20and%20either%20being%20able%20to%20prevent%20it%20being%20sent%20or%20have%20the%20option%20to%20override.%26nbsp%3B%20Therefore%20also%20having%20a%20log%20of%20who%20shared%20what%20and%20when.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20notice%20I%20could%20create%20a%20retention%20label%20with%20no%20retention%20to%20achieve%20this%20for%20OneDrive%20and%20SharePoint%20but%20then%20I%20would%20have%20duplicate%20labels%20that%20have%20to%20be%20applied%20in%20OneDrive%20and%20SharePoint%20online%20and%20not%20through%20Word%20or%20Excel%20and%20it%20does%20not%20support%20emails.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-340689%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-340689%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Andrea%20-%20thanks%20for%20the%20feedback.%20Yes%2C%20we%20have%20DLP%20support%20for%20Sensitivity%20labels%20on%20our%20roadmap!%20Can%20you%20expand%20a%20bit%20on%20your%20top-scenarios%20for%20Sensitivity%20label%20support%20in%20DLP%3F%20What%20kind%20of%20content%2C%20and%20where%20is%20it%20stored%2Fshared%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-339394%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-339394%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3EIt%20is%20a%20shame%20that%20DLP%20policy%20cannot%20use%20the%20Sensitivity%20labels%20in%20the%20same%20way%20retention%20labels%20can%2C%20are%20there%20any%20plans%20for%20this%3F%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-331421%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-331421%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EAny%20idea%20on%20when%20the%20client%20will%20move%20from%20Preview%20to%20production%3F%20ETA%20would%20be%20great!%20%3A)%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-320059%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-320059%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3EAre%20there%20any%20plans%20to%20implement%20the%20advanced%20features%20of%20AIP%20to%20Unified%20Labelling%3F%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CSPAN%3EWe%20have%20enabled%20Unified%20Labelling%20for%20our%20tenant%20and%20migrated%20our%20AIP%20labels%20to%20SCC%20but%20some%20features%20such%20as%20the%20Automatic%2Frecommended%20classification%20of%20files%20based%20on%20PPI%20in%20document%20aren%E2%80%99t%20working%3F%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CSPAN%3EI%20am%20currently%20using%20the%20Azure%20Information%20Protection%20unified%20labelling%20client%20for%20Windows%20on%20client%20devices.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CSPAN%3EI%20know%20that%20Unified%20Labelling%20cannot%20be%20disabled%20currently%20but%20we%20were%20very%20impressed%20by%20the%20automatic%20features%20of%20AIP%20labels%20and%20disappointed%20that%20the%20functionality%20is%20missing.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CA%20title%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fazure%2Finformation-protection%2Fconfigure-policy-migrate-labels%23considerations-for-unified-labels%22%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fazure%2Finformation-protection%2Fconfigure-policy-migrate-labels%23considerations-for-unified-labels%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noreferrer%20noopener%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fazure%2Finformation-protection%2Fconfigure-policy-migrate-labels%23considerations-for-unified-labels%3C%2FA%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CSPAN%3EThanks%2C%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CSPAN%3EMark.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-303086%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-303086%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Ali%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EFor%20the%20scenario%20where%20the%20customer%20wants%20to%20assign%20a%20classification%20that%20persists%20with%20their%20data%2C%20I%20would%20advocate%20using%20our%20Unified%20Labeling%20solution%20instead%20of%20Exchange%20Data%20Classifiers.%20Unified%20labels%26nbsp%3Bprovide%20a%20more%20holistic%20approach%20thats%26nbsp%3Bsupport%20a%20broader%20set%20of%20content%20types%20(docs%2C%20emails%2C%20data)%20and%26nbsp%3Bwe%20will%20continue%20to%20invest%20in%26nbsp%3Bthe%20apps%20and%20services%26nbsp%3Bthat%20can%26nbsp%3Binterop%20with%20our%20Unified%20Labeling%20solution.%20Of%20course%2C%20customers%20can%20continue%20to%20use%20Data%20Classifiers%20-%20e.g.%20if%20they%20have%20a%20technical%20need%20that%20is%20not%20yet%20supported%20with%20unified%20labels.%20(And%20if%20there%20are%20gaps%20preventing%20them%20from%20moving%20to%20Unified%20Labels%20-%20please%20do%20share%20the%20feedback%20with%20us!)%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3Ethanks%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%2FMas%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-302447%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-302447%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHey%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F65194%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Mas%20Libman%3C%2FA%3E%20-%20Would%20you%26nbsp%3Bbe%20so%20kind%20and%20provide%20an%20update%20for%20us%20about%20how%20Unified%20Labeling%20vs.%20Data%20Classification%20is%20being%20positioned%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIs%20it%20safe%20to%20assume%20that%20data%20classification%26nbsp%3Bproperty%20is%20less%20significant%20to%20use%20now%2C%20since%20it%20was%20just%20a%20%22string%22%20field%2C%20while%20with%20MIP%20labels%20-which%20I%20am%20guessing%20that%20will%20replace%20Data%20Classification%20labels-%20will%20be%20actionable%20labels.%20I%20don't%20want%20to%20assume.%20Please%20let%20us%20know!%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-290660%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-290660%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EGood%20call%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F304%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Ali%20Salih%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BI%20have%20now%20watched%20BRK2137%26nbsp%3B%20a%20couple%20of%20times%20and%20getting%20used%20to%20Christophe's%20speed%20talking!%26nbsp%3B%20Interesting%20about%20the%20use%20of%20labels%20in%20groups%20which%20seems%20to%20do%20that%20they%20described%20ealier%20custom%20jobs%20as%20in%20if%20Category%20%3D%26nbsp%3B%20Highly%20confidential%20then%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CPRE%3ESet-SPOSite%20-Identity%20%24siteUrl%20-SharingCapability%20Disabled%3C%2FPRE%3E%3CP%3EI%20think%20we%20will%20want%20this%20even%20for%20internal%20team%20members%20as%20we%20would%20rather%20they%20were%20participating%20in%20the%20team%20site%20from%20within%20-%20another%20reason%20not%20to%20mirror%20departments%20but%20to%20represent%20cross-team%20business%20functions..%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EJust%20got%20the%20sequel%20lined%20up%20to%20watch%3A%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fmyignite.techcommunity.microsoft.com%2Fsessions%2F66487%22%20target%3D%22_self%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3E%26nbsp%3Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fmyignite.techcommunity.microsoft.com%2Fsessions%2F66487%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-288766%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-288766%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F5701%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Daniel%20Westerdale%3C%2FA%3E-%20I%20checked%20with%20couple%20folks%20and%20re-watched%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fmyignite.techcommunity.microsoft.com%2Fsessions%2F64267%3Fsource%3Dsessions%23ignite-html-anchor%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3EBRK2137%20-%20Embrace%20Office%20365%20Groups%3A%20What's%20new%20and%20how%20to%20get%20started%3C%2FA%3E%2C%20and%20the%20Unified%20Labeling%20is%20definitely%20in%20the%20works%20for%20Office%20365%20Groups%20classification.%20You%20can%20see%20it%20in%20action%20towards%20the%20end%20of%20the%20video%20as%20well.%20However%2C%20no%20ETA%20yet.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-288761%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-288761%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F304%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Ali%20Salih%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BI%20also%20have%20the%20same%20question%20given%20the%20above%20settings%20are%20only%20for%20%22Unified%26nbsp%3B%20Groups%22.%26nbsp%3B%20Surely%20we%20want%20to%20do%20something%20similar%20for%20our%20newly%20provisioned%20Hub%20and%20Communication%20sites%3F%20Why%20can't%20all%20this%20be%20in%20done%20in%20a%20Site%20Design%20on%20PnP%20Provisioning%20template%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-286821%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-286821%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHello%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F65194%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Mas%20Libman%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B-%20Are%20there%20any%20plans%20to%20apply%20unified%20labels%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%3F%20I%20recently%20migrated%20my%20AIP%20labels%20to%20Office%20365%20Security%20and%20Compliance%20Center%20and%20now%20they%20are%20in-sync%20(in%20preview%20feature).%20However%2C%20I%20still%20see%20that%20my%20Office%20365%20Group%20classification%20labels%20are%20standalone%20settings%20and%20disconnected%20from%20the%20unified%20labeling.%20And%20I%20do%20not%20see%20anything%20on%20the%20road%20map%2C%20is%20this%20something%20in%20the%20works%20still%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EProviding%20a%20sample%20screenshot%20to%20be%20clear%20of%20which%20classification%20I%20am%20talking%20about.%26nbsp%3B%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-center%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20999px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F59807i59EC61F010868F9E%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20alt%3D%22O365%20Group%20Data%20Classification.jpg%22%20title%3D%22O365%20Group%20Data%20Classification.jpg%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAli.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-277006%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-277006%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F155588%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Ben%20Harris%3C%2FA%3E%20I%20suggest%20taking%20a%20look%20at%20our%20product%20documentation%20that%20should%20answer%20most%20of%20your%20questions%3A%20%3CA%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fmanagemip%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttp%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fmanagemip%3C%2FA%3E%3CFONT%3E%20as%20well%20as%20further%20details%20on%20Office%20client%20behavior%20here%3A%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fsupport.office.com%2Fen-us%2Farticle%2Fapply-sensitivity-labels-to-your-documents-and-email-within-office-2f96e7cd-d5a4-403b-8bd7-4cc636bae0f9%20%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fsupport.office.com%2Fen-us%2Farticle%2Fapply-sensitivity-labels-to-your-documents-and-email-within-office-2f96e7cd-d5a4-403b-8bd7-4cc636bae0f9%3C%2FA%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3C%2FFONT%3E%3CFONT%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3C%2FFONT%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-276768%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-276768%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F65194%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Mas%20Libman%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BHi%20Mas%2C%20a%20couple%20of%20questions%20if%20that's%20OK%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWill%20published%20labels%20appear%20in%20OWA%3F%20under%20the%20Encrypt%20button%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWill%20published%20labels%20appear%20in%20Outlook%20under%20the%20Encrypt%20%2F%20Permissions%20button%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWill%20the%20watermark%20option%20for%20content%20apply%20to%20emails%20as%20well%3F%20or%20just%20documents%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThanks%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EBen.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-276666%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-276666%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHey%20everyone%20-%20circling%20back%20real%20quick%20to%20confirm%20that%20all%20regions%20are%20now%26nbsp%3Benabled%20for%20Sensitivity%20labels!!%20Just%20open%20the%26nbsp%3BSecurity%20and%20Compliance%26nbsp%3BCenter%2C%20click%26nbsp%3BClassification%20--%26gt%3B%20Labels%2C%20and%20look%20for%20the%20%22Sensitivity%20tab%22.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F57226%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Eric%20Schrader%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BWe're%20working%20on%20GCC%2Fetc%20rollout%20as%20quickly%20as%20we%20can%2C%20but%20don't%20have%20an%20ETA%20yet%20when%20it%20will%20be%20ready.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F5409%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tommy%20Clarke%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B-%26nbsp%3BYes%2C%20that's%20the%20expected%20process.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-271218%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-271218%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EIs%20this%20available%20in%20the%20GCC%20or%20GCC%20High%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-269214%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-269214%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F65194%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Mas%20Libman%3C%2FA%3E%20so%20once%20i%20see%20the%20Sensitivity%20tab%20in%20my%20EU%20tenants%20i%20should%20be%20able%20to%20go%20in%20to%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fportal.azure.com%2F%3FActivateMigration%3Dtrue%23blade%2FMicrosoft_Azure_InformationProtection%2FDataClassGroupEditBlade%2FmigrationActivationBlade%22%20data-linktype%3D%22external%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fportal.azure.com%2F%3FActivateMigration%3Dtrue%23blade%2FMicrosoft_Azure_InformationProtection%2FDataClassGroupEditBlade%2FmigrationActivationBlade%3C%2FA%3E%20and%20activate%20unified%20labeling%3F%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-268559%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-268559%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThanks.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ELooking%20forward%20to%20announcing%20from%20you.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-268557%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-268557%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Akio%20-%20we'll%20post%20an%20update%20as%20soon%20as%20its%20available%2C%20I%20assure%20you!%20Just%20a%20few%20more%20days%20....%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-265498%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-265498%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWhen%20will%20it%20become%20available%20in%20Japanese%20version%3F%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EI%20can%20find%20them%20on%20Home%20tabs%2C%20but%20cannot%20click%20them%20now.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-265492%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-265492%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EAgain%20with%20that%20NA%20stuff...%20annoying%20%3A)%3C%2Fimg%3E%20Guess%20I'll%20wait%2C%20and%20thanks%20for%20clarifying.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-265367%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-265367%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CDIV%3EHi%20Vasil%2C%20thanks%20for%20your%20interest%20in%20our%20new%20unified%20labeling%20capabilities!%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FDIV%3E%0A%3CDIV%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FDIV%3E%0A%3CDIV%3EAll%26nbsp%3B%3CFONT%20size%3D%223%22%3E%3CSPAN%3ENorth%20America%20customers%26nbsp%3Bshould%20now%20have%20access%20to%20the%20feature%20from%20the%20Office%20365%20Security%20and%20Compliance%20Center.%20Is%20your%20tenant%20in%20North%20America%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FFONT%3E%3C%2FDIV%3E%0A%3CDIV%3E%3CFONT%20size%3D%223%22%3E%3CSPAN%3EIf%20not%2C%20it%20may%20take%20(at%20most)%20a%20few%20weeks%20before%20the%20rollout%20completes%20saturation%20for%20all%20regions.%20We're%20anxious%20to%20see%20this%20released%2C%20and%20will%20plan%20to%20post%20an%20update%20to%20this%20blog%20as%20soon%20as%20the%20WW%20roll%20out%20completes.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FFONT%3E%3C%2FDIV%3E%0A%3CDIV%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FDIV%3E%0A%3CDIV%3E%3CFONT%20size%3D%223%22%3E%3CSPAN%3EThanks%2C%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FFONT%3E%3C%2FDIV%3E%0A%3CDIV%3E%3CFONT%20size%3D%223%22%3E%3CSPAN%3E%2FMas%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FFONT%3E%3C%2FDIV%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-264961%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-264961%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EAhem%2C%20we've%20been%20waiting%20for%20this%20for%20an%20year%20now%2C%26nbsp%3Bwe%20can%20wait%20few%20more%20days%2Fweeks%2C%20but%20maybe%20you%20should%20be%20a%20bit%20more%20specific%20as%20to%20when%20it's%20expected%20to%20be%20rolled%20out.%20As%20it%20is%20NOT%20currently%20available%20in%20any%20of%20the%20dozen%20or%20so%20tenants%20I%20work%20with.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-680847%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-680847%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EIn%20the%20case%20of%20tenants%20who%20are%26nbsp%3B%20currently%20using%26nbsp%3B%20AIP%20classic%20labelling%20and%20want%20to%20move%20to%20the%20new%20AIP%20unified%20labelling%3A%20Is%20it%20mandatory%20to%20%3CSTRONG%3EActivate%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%26nbsp%3B%20the%20Unified%20labelling%20status%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20999px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F117636iA0AE93AC4962EC96%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20alt%3D%22Activate%20Unfied%20labelling.PNG%22%20title%3D%22Activate%20Unfied%20labelling.PNG%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-681255%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-681255%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F5701%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Daniel%20Westerdale%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B-%20yes%2C%20you%20must%20activate%20unified%20labeling%20before%20you%20can%20use%20the%20new%20unified%20labeling%20plugin%20with%20your%20existing%2Fclassic%20AIP%20labels.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-681523%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-681523%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EUnderstood%2C%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F65194%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Mas%20Libman%3C%2FA%3E.%20Finally%2C%20can%20I%20also%20simply%20add%20new%20sensitivity%20labels%20in%20Office%20365%20to%20work%20with%20the%20new%20UL%20client%20as%20an%20early%20pre%20test%20prior%20to%20activation.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-681987%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-681987%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F5701%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Daniel%20Westerdale%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BYes%2C%20you%20could%20postpone%20activation%20and%20create%20%22test%22%20labels%20in%20SCC%2C%20however%20I%20suggest%20activating%20first%2C%20and%20then%20create%20test%20labels.%20This%20assures%20you%20don't%20create%20inadvertent%20conflicts%2C%20and%20you%20can%20test%20the%20labels%20across%20all%20supported%20clients.%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fazure%2Finformation-protection%2Fconfigure-policy-migrate-labels%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fazure%2Finformation-protection%2Fconfigure-policy-migrate-labels%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-682733%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-682733%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F65194%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Mas%20Libman%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%20Thanks%20for%20your%20reply%20which%20is%20timely%2C%20as%20I%20have%20just%20been%20given%20the%20go%20ahead%20to%20Activate%20in%20our%20test%20Azure%20environment%20.%20Once%20I%20have%20migrated%20the%20labels%20and%20policies%2C%20I%20will%20be%20repeating%20the%20usability%20testing%20on%20behalf%20or%20our%20users.%20Thanks%20again%20for%20your%20responses%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-839673%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-839673%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F65194%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Mas%20Libman%3C%2FA%3E-%20Thank%20you%20for%20keeping%20this%20thread%20alive.%20One%20of%20my%20customers%20is%20having%20a%20problem.%20They%20are%20GCC%20(not%20High)%20and%20we%20are%20helping%20this%20test%20things%20in%20a%20small%20tenant%20where%20all%20users%20have%20G5%20and%20EMS%20G5%20licensed.%20UL%20Sensitivity%20Labels%20are%20available%20in%20S%26amp%3BC%2C%20and%20have%20been%20configured.%20They%20work%20correctly%20on%20Windows%20machines%20with%20the%20UL%20client%20loaded%2C%20but%20they%20do%20not%20work%20correctly%20on%20Mac%20machines.%20Below%20is%20are%20some%20(I%20hope)%20relevant%20bits%20of%20information%20that%20lead%20me%20to%20ask%3A%20Are%20UL%20labels%20supposed%20to%20be%20working%20in%20GCC%3F%20-%20The%20Unified%20Labeling%20activation%20(for%20label%20sync%20between%20classic%20and%20UL)%20is%20not%20present%20in%20the%20Azure%20portal.%20We've%20been%20told%20that%20the%20sync%20is%20not%20available%20for%20GCC%2C%20yet%2C%20but%20that%20UL%20sensitivity%20labels%20should%20work%20fine.%20-%20Every%20UL%20label%20that%20is%20not%20set%20for%20user%20permissions%20shows%20up%20in%20the%20Protection%20Templates%20in%20Azure%20(not%20in%20the%20labels%2C%20of%20course%2C%20as%20there%20is%20no%20sync%20running).%20I%20hope%20what%20I'm%20trying%20to%20say%20makes%20sense.%20For%20example%2C%20we%20have%20a%20head%20label%20called%20%22Sensitive%20Information%22.%20A%20sub-label%20under%20that%20called%20%22Sensitive%20Information%20-%20Company%20Users%22%20that%20applies%20encryption%20allowing%20anyone%20in%20our%20company%20access%20to%20the%20file.%20We%20have%20another%20sub-label%20called%20%22Sensitive%20Information%20-%20Custom%22%20that%20lets%20the%20user%20choose%20the%20permissions%20when%20they%20apply%20the%20label.%20All%20of%20this%20is%20configured%20in%20UL.%20The%20%22Sensitive%20Information%20-%20Company%22%20label%20shows%20up%20as%20a%20Protection%20Template%20in%20Azure%20(the%20name%20shows%20up%20as%20a%20combination%20of%20the%20head%20label%20and%20the%20sub-label.%20%22Sensitive%20Information%20-%20Sensitive%20Information%20-%20Company%20Users%22%20in%20this%20example).%20The%20%22Custom%22%20label%20in%20UL%20does%20NOT%20show%20up%20in%20the%20Azure%20AIP%20Protection%20Template%20section.%20-%20There%20are%20no%20labels%20configured%20in%20Azure%20(there%20*were*%20labels%2C%20but%20we%20deleted%20them%20before%20configuring%20the%20UL%20labels)%20-%20In%20Mac%20Office%20apps%2C%20there%20is%20no%20Sensitivity%20button%20on%20display%20at%20all.%20We%20have%20even%20signed%20out%20of%20Office%20and%20signed%20back%20in%20(multiple%20Macs%20are%20experiencing%20this%2C%20all%20have%20Office%202019%20pointed%20to%20the%20tenant).%20-%20In%20Mac%20Office%20apps%2C%20the%20%22Protection%22%20button%20will%20show%20what's%20contained%20in%20the%20Azure%20AIP%20Protection%20Template%20section%20(which%20lists%20the%20non-custom%20labels%20we%20defined%20in%20UL).%20We%20have%20a%20premier%20ticket%20open%2C%20but%20the%20going%20has%20been%20slow.%20I%20thought%20I%20would%20post%20here%20and%20just%20ask%20the%20general%20question%20around%20whether%20or%20not%20UL%20was%20supposed%20to%20be%20working%20in%20GCC.%20Thanks%20in%20advance.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-876767%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Announcing%20the%20availability%20of%20unified%20labeling%20management%20in%20the%20Security%20%26amp%3B%20Compliance%20Cent%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-876767%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CDIV%20class%3D%22lia-message-author-with-avatar%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22UserName%20lia-user-name%20lia-user-rank-Microsoft%20lia-component-message-view-widget-author-username%22%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F65194%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Mas%20Libman%3C%2FA%3E%2C%20you%20mentioned%20in%20feb%202019%20that%20sensitivity%20labels%20is%20on%20the%20roadmap%2C%20however%20looking%20for%20it%2C%20it%20is%20not%20there.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FDIV%3E%3CDIV%20class%3D%22lia-message-author-with-avatar%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22UserName%20lia-user-name%20lia-user-rank-Microsoft%20lia-component-message-view-widget-author-username%22%3EAs%20we%20migrated%20recently%20to%20Unified%20Labels%2C%20to%20be%20able%20to%20use%20them%20across%20the%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FDIV%3E%3CDIV%20class%3D%22lia-message-author-with-avatar%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22UserName%20lia-user-name%20lia-user-rank-Microsoft%20lia-component-message-view-widget-author-username%22%3Eplatform%2C%20it%20is%20a%20big%20pity%20that%20DLP%20still%20cannot%20handle%20it.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FDIV%3E%3CDIV%20class%3D%22lia-message-author-with-avatar%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FDIV%3E%3CDIV%20class%3D%22lia-message-author-with-avatar%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FDIV%3E%3CDIV%20class%3D%22lia-message-author-with-avatar%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22UserName%20lia-user-name%20lia-user-rank-Microsoft%20lia-component-message-view-widget-author-username%22%3E%26nbsp%3BAny%20ETA%20known%3F%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FDIV%3E%3CDIV%20class%3D%22lia-message-author-with-avatar%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FDIV%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Version history
Last update:
‎Oct 12 2018 01:35 PM
Updated by: