Nov 27 2020 06:04 AM
We have had LAPS in our environment for a number of months now, but we have 2 issues with the LAPS usage assessment:
1. Duplicate device entries - we have around 100 devices with 2 or sometime 3 entries in the report.
2. Data doesn't seem up to date - we have devices reported as 'LAPS is not deployed' when the LAPS attributes were updated some weeks ago. I believe from the documentation that the LAPS assessment should run every 24 hours.
Can anyone suggest causes/fixes for these issues?
Many Thanks,
Stuart.
Nov 29 2020 12:15 AM
Hi,
1. Regarding the duplicated devices, can you confirm these are the same devices, not devices from other domains or that have been deleted?
2. If you are certain that these specific devices are indeed LAPS deployed, please open a support ticket as this needs to be verified.
Thanks!
Nov 29 2020 12:32 AM
@StuartSquibb , for the device reported as "laps is not deployed", can you check the value of the ms-Mcs-AdmPwdExpirationTime attribute? is it older than 60 days ?
Nov 30 2020 08:36 AM
@Or Tsemah
Having spent some time digging around in our on-prem environment, it looks as if these are objects the have been tombstoned in our AD, probably with the devices in question having been rebuilt multiple times, so this was a false alarm, sorry for wasting your time .
Would it be at all possible to surface the DeviceObjectId property of devices in the downloadable versions of the LAPS reports? This would really help us in reconciling the data, as it is a common identifier between on-prem AD, Azure AD and MDI/MCAS.
Once again, my apologies for the false alarm.
Stuart.
Dec 01 2020 02:29 AM
@StuartSquibb No worries Stuart,
We are constantly evaluating how to better surface the information presented in the assessments, so I'll add you're suggestion to the list and update
Jan 27 2021 03:09 AM
Hopefully its OK that I jump on this thread.
I have been looking at the LAPS reports this morning and wonder if its possible to get some more fields addded?
A lot of the machines in the report are either disabled or deleted (tombstoned) in AD. I don't see any point in following them up, so it would be good if we could filter them out.
It would also be useful to see if the machine is active or not. Could you add lastLogonTimestamp (the replicated one) so we can see if the machine is worth following up?
Best regards,
Sandy
Jan 27 2021 05:17 AM
Thanks for those suggestion, these are indeed items that we would like to see in the report and we are actively working on making these happen, I'll share an ETA when i have on
Aug 17 2021 02:01 AM
Aug 17 2021 07:01 AM
@PELADANISHAGRO No ETA regarding the added columns, however, tombstoned devices should already be excluded, ping me if they are not