Event banner
Microsoft Government CMMC AMA
Event details
We want to hear from our customers and answer their questions around how we can help them achieve CMMC compliance with your Microsoft Azure and Microsoft 365 subscriptions. We will be hosting an "Ask Microsoft Anything" (AMA) session on Tuesday, April 12th from 10:30 AM - 11:00 AM PST here and answering questions in the comments below.
This event is open to all Tech Community members and we'll have members of the Microsoft product experts standing by to provide answers.
Feel free to post your questions about CMMC anytime in the comments below beforehand, if it fits your schedule or time zone better, though questions will not be answered until the live hour.
***Please note : This AMA is only to answer questions in regards to achieving CMMC compliance with our Microsoft products, including Microsoft Azure and Microsoft 365.
98 Comments
- Sarah_GilbertSilver ContributorThank you for joining our AMA today! We appreciate all the great questions and hope you learned something new! I'll be locking this event to new questions and sharing a summary of the questions and answers in this space in a bit. Stay tuned for our next Public Sector AMA in the coming months!
- James LucierCopper ContributorAre their plans to add the ability to backup Compliance Manger in GCC High? I believe that functionality is in commercial now.
- Justin_Orcutt
Microsoft
Hi James - What specifically are you trying to back up in Compliance Manager?- James LucierCopper ContributorThe ability to save an assessment in progress. We had a client that was working one and after an update was pushed they lost everything they had. Is there a way to backup these up to make sure does not happen again?
- MarkShadleCopper ContributorMy apologies if this question was asked previously, but will a transcript of all the questions and answers be made available following this live discussion?
- Sarah_GilbertSilver ContributorHello Mark! This AMA is all text based and we will be leaving this up after the session is over for anyone to view 🙂
- rybo3000Brass ContributorIs there an effective way to cross-map or compare Trusted Internet Connection (TIC 3.0) guidance with CMMC or 800-53 requirements? Agencies and industry are moving quickly towards TIC and zero trust concepts, and we'd love to keep all these initiatives aligned.
- RichardWakeman
Microsoft
Howdy Ryan! Always love your stump da chump! 🙂 Ultimately, our Federal customers must get Agency FedRAMP ATOs for connecting to O365 and Azure with supporting documentation to support the TIC. As it stands, most Federal customers enforce Express Route through their TIC to Azure Gov (incl GCCH & DoD). This is primarily assisted by our MS Federal support teams, but is really the gov't requirement as opposed to MSFT. Check out https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/security/trusted-internet-connections. For the mapping, TJ Banasic just released a Sentinel Solution that does some mapping. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security/zero-trust/integrate/sentinel-solution. We can follow up with TJ on the cross-walk to 171/53. And the MS Federal teams if they can share some info. But my favorite aspect of TIC 3.0 is the ability to use ZTA to connect directly to the cloud. "Dynamic Routing" as we call it. Our whitepaper: https://cortacgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/CMMC-and-Split-Tunnels_Feb2022.pdf
- Kenskens3104Occasional ReaderI was looking at Compliance manager to address CMMC compliance. I see that it follows CMMC version 1 Is there going to be an update for CMMC 2.0 https://compliance.microsoft.com/compliancemanager/assessmenttemplate/5ac960a0-37eb-431c-a4b6-939c39363568?viewid=Controls&templatename=CMMC%20Level%203 and is there a demo available to try / evaluate with
- Paul Meacham
Microsoft
Howdy Ken! Regarding the CMMC Assessment Templates in GCC and GCC High: The Compliance Manager is generally available in all Microsoft 365 cloud offerings, including GCC and GCC High. The Assessment Templates for CMMC are also generally available for your use today. We have made a licensing exception for the CMMC assessment templates in GCC and GCC High. While most other assessment templates require premium template licenses, the CMMC assessment templates do not require the premium template licenses in GCC nor GCC High. You will still need the proper Microsoft 365 SKU to get the rights for a user to access the Compliance Manager. Please see the most up-to-date licensing requirements here and here. At the time of this writing, the CMMC assessment templates are included by default (free of cost) for GCC and GCC High with the following SKUs: Microsoft 365 or Office 365 G5 Microsoft 365 G5/F5 Compliance Microsoft 365 G5/F5 eDiscovery and Audit Microsoft 365 G5/F5 Insider Risk Management Microsoft 365 G5/F5 Information Protection and Governance Please note the CMMC assessment templates do require premium template licenses in Commercial. The licensing exception only applies to GCC and GCC High. As of the time of this writing, there is a 90 day trial for up to 25 premium assessment templates, including CMMC and NIST SP 800-171 in any cloud offering (Commercial, GCC, and GCC High). Please see premium assessment trial for more information. The Secure Score feature is still in preview within Commercial and GCC. Secure Score will not release in GCC High until it becomes Generally Available. As a result, automated testing does not work in GCC High. GCC High customers will need to manually implement and test their improvement actions in the Compliance Manager. For more information, please see Settings for automated testing and user history. The CMMC 2.0 templates will be drifted into Compliance Manager this quarter however, the NIST 800-171 templates are currently available. If you are preparing for a CMMC assessment you should consider taking a look at the Azure Sentinel CMMC 2.0 workbook. Read more here: https://github.com/Azure/Azure-Sentinel/tree/master/Solutions/CybersecurityMaturityModelCertification(CMMC)2.0 - jolenetam
Microsoft
GCC High customers now have access to CMMC 2.0 Levels 1 and 2 assessment templates. By mid-April WWMT, GCC and DoD customers also will have access to Compliance Manager’s updated CMMC Levels 1 and 2 assessments. Once CMMC 2.0 Level 3 regulation is published, the Compliance Manager engineering team will announce general availability for the updated CMMC Level 3 assessment templates.- Sarah_GilbertSilver Contributor
For more information you can check out What's new in Microsoft Compliance Manager
- Shamshul KhaliqCopper ContributorIf we want to migrate from Commercial to GCC High biggest hurdle is the Voice. How is Microsoft looking to address the PSTN involvement via third-party? What is the best recommendation for someone who is on commercial and using Microsoft Team for Calling
- Justin_Orcutt
Microsoft
Hi Shamshul - Thank you for the question. You are correct that as organizations move into GCCH it is important for them to understand how audio-conferencing works. Organizations in GCCH that want to enable audio-conferencing will need to set up direct routing with an external telecommunications company. We have a few partners with GCCH specific offerings including AT&T and Call Tower as an example. I hope this helps.- LisaHaywood
Microsoft
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/audio-conferencing-with-direct-routing-for-gcch-and-dod This documentation might be helpful.
- Joshua1984Copper ContributorCan Co-Op funds be used to help Partners achieve CMMC Compliance?
- MarionRousseau
Microsoft
Hi Joshua, Partner Co-op funds are used for marketing efforts. You can use the "On Site Champion" option to create a solution or offering. This would allow you to hire a CMMC consultant to audit your offerings and make recommendations on how to adapt them to help your customers reach compliance. This could not be used to assess your own CMMC compliance gaps, which we recommend going to a C3PAO for an assessment.
- MRConsultingCopper ContributorHow does Microsoft plan to leverage CMMC for GCCH with customers who are in both GCCH and Commercial. Without cross-sovereign awareness for cloud tenancies, managing multiple tenants becomes cumbersome and overhead costly. While you can attain tenant-specific maturity levels; how does a multi-sovereign-cloud organization do this efficiently and cost-effectively? Example: Using the same tools in both tenants to manage document protection. Today, tenants cannot 'share' protection policies or labels. What is Microsoft's approach to allowing organizations that *have to* span different sovereign clouds a more unified administration and protection model?
- Paul Meacham
Microsoft
Howdy Marcos! Microsoft is in the same position. Microsoft runs a global business with more than 180k people homed in the WW service. In order to meet our contractual commitments to the US Federal Government, Microsoft formed the Microsoft Federal business subsidiary business homed in a US//NOFORN GCC High tenant. Both the WW & FedNet tenants have separate SMTP addresses (@microsoft.com vs @microsoftfederal.com) and separate identities. We provide separate devices (both physical and virtual) to provide data isolation. We have separate administrators and cyber teams. There are some ways to wire up a Commercial tenant and a GCC High tenant such as calendar free busy, file sharing via one-time passcode (OTP) and Teams federation. There is also the idea of an extranet or a "meet me" tenant that can be used as an intermediate data repository and workspace. There is an article here that details some of the available cross-cloud and cross-tenant collaboration modalities: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/public-sector-blog/m365-cross-cloud-and-cross-tenant-collaboration-scenarios/ba-p/2967674 Microsoft is working on cross-cloud B2B (CCB2B) which will allow even more sharing modalities as just about every one of our large, strategic customers operate globally and have some requirement for national cloud use cases (US, China, France, etc.). I hope this helps! Feel free to connect with me to discuss further 🙂 - Bergin2
Microsoft
Marcos, great question we are approaching that problem of CMMC as a common 3rd Party Validated standard that allows us to engage with partners at a common security posture. When we talk about bridging the commercial, or even another GCCH tenant, we have to recognize that not just MIP is an issue but citizenship access restrictions, geographic constraints, or other unique contractual terms. Establishing a DMZ offers one way to address project specific work items. It isn't perfect but it works today and we, like you, have active contracts we need to keep supporting.
- TDS_David_WOccasional ReaderThe John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (NDAA 2019) also specifies restrictions for companies wishing to do business with the Defense De3partment. Products from three specific companies were banned, for example. However, there was also language about not being dependent on services "owned by, controlled by or connected to" the government of China. What does this mean for MS? Are you needing to research company ownership? Are you able to work on systems and data supporting US government data from China?
- Paul Meacham
Microsoft
Howdy David! Regarding the first part of your question: Specific to 889(a)(1)(A), relating to equipment or services produced by Huawei Technologies Co Ltd, ZTE Corporation, Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, and Dahua Technology Company, Microsoft cloud infrastructure teams do not currently purchase from these companies. Additionally, Microsoft Surface devices and accessories do not use any parts or equipment produced by these companies. Regarding the second part of your question: Microsoft Federal is a Microsoft subsidiary that supports the US Federal Government (Federal Civilian, IC, and DOD). This organization is homed in an US//NOFORN GCC High environment. Read more about Microsoft Federal here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/federal/ I hope this helps!
- SamClark2411Copper ContributorWhat are thoughts around CUI and emails? Is email a communication mechanism forbidden to transmit CUI or if the email system (Exchange Online) lives in a GCC High environment, then it could be acceptable (at least transmitting between other like CMMC level qualified entities)? I would assume that CUI should never be transmitted via email (because of the nature of CUI and email), but don't know of anything definitive on this topic.
- SmccartinCopper ContributorThere are some complications with encryption Assuming Microsoft uses FIPS compliant encryption, then you would have to change the default TLS configuration from opportunistic encryption to forced encryption. Transmission of CUI is allowed as long as it is enclosed in FIPS approved encryption. Though TLS only encrypts the transfer between mail servers so something like S/MIME might be needed.
- Kenskens3104Occasional Readermight that not mean that all communication between his mail server and others would all have to have the same encryption settings?