Forum Discussion
Channels not visible for private group videos view-able by all
Abhimanyu Singh - You are right your only options are a new or existing public O365 Group to accomplish most of what you want.
The setting in Stream for making members viewers only, does only apply to Stream not to the other workloads that come with the O365 Group.
With your use case and scenario you can't quite get all the requirements covered. We are going to be doing more research and customer interviews in this new year to come up with plans on how to better address Stream groups/channels/permissions. We may want to reach out to you (and others who are interested) as we start our interviews in the coming weeks.
MicrosoftAbhimanyu Singh - You are right your only options are a new or existing public O365 Group to accomplish most of what you want.
The setting in Stream for making members viewers only, does only apply to Stream not to the other workloads that come with the O365 Group.
With your use case and scenario you can't quite get all the requirements covered. We are going to be doing more research and customer interviews in this new year to come up with plans on how to better address Stream groups/channels/permissions. We may want to reach out to you (and others who are interested) as we start our interviews in the coming weeks.
Marc Mroz thank you for the confirmation. I think we shall continue to stick to dumping videos in a document library for now. Stream as it stands today, doesn't provide any value to us. With Microsoft removing the feature of extracting EXIF/metadata data into columns, and unavailability metadata/columns in Stream; things are already getting more and more constrained.
I would certainly like to participate in the interviews that you are planning. Please count me in. Hoping that would help make Stream useful to our use-case(s).
Somehow, I strongly feel that using O365 Groups as the underpinning for permissions is the root cause of such usability problems not only with Stream but other workloads as well. O365 Groups as a membership construct is great, but as a permission model needs serious re-think.
