Forum Discussion
Guidance on multiple window 10 builds and baselines
Good Afternoon,
I am wondering if anyone out there has some guidance on managing multiple baselines. Meaning, I have Windows 10 1803, 1809, 1903 and 1909 versions. What is the best way to manage baselines with multiple version of Windows 10? Same question might apply to Microsoft 365 suite as well as Edge Browser (80, 81).
A. Do I have a baseline for each OS? (WMI filtering?)
B. Do I have a baseline for each with delta changes only?
C. Do I have a single baseline with deltas added for each version of Windows 10
What are enterprises doing to manage this?
Thanks
20 Replies
- Chad BrowerCopper Contributor
I plan to add 21h2 baselines to our env. It is actually very simple, because there are very little amount of changes from 21h1 to 21h2.
Basically my plan was to create a new policy for the new settings > Test > merge into production policy. - traxelotl_Copper Contributor
A design focused on functionality, not so much organization.
Need to decide how many builds / versions to support, but it's managable.
Loopback policy processing replace -- UsersGPO's doesn't matter this way
(Can still be managed with group filtering)
GPO's are merged (user/computer), so one GPO per function.
MSFT - Clean import from MSSec
CustomSecurity - Security related settings for that specific component
CustomSettings - NonSecuritySettings related to that specific component
OU Structure:
Computers\Standard\Portable
Computers\Standard\Stationary
Computers\OtherFunction\Portable
Computers\OtherFunction\Stationary
GPOs
Above the below, comes group filtered GPO's for exceptions etc.
(WMI Appver, Authenticated users)
Client-Edge 80-CustomSettings
Client-Edge 80-CustomSecurity
Client-Edge 80-MSFT
(WMI Appver, Authenticated users)
Client-Office 1908-CustomSettings
Client-Office 1908-CustomSecurity
Client-Office 1908-ExcelDDE-MSFT
Client-Office 1908-LegacyFileBlock-MSFT
Client-Office 1908-RequireMacro
Client-Office 1908-MSFT
(WMIOSVer, Authenticated users)
Client-Windows 10 1909-InternetExplorer11-CustomSettings
Client-Windows 10 1909-InternetExplorer11-CustomSecurity
Client-Windows 10 1909-InternetExplorer11-MSFT
Client-Windows 10 1909-DomainSecurityCustomSettings
Client-Windows 10 1909-DomainSecurityCustomSecurity
Client-Windows 10 1909-DomainSecurity-MSFT
Client-Windows 10 1909-Defender-CustomSettings
Client-Windows 10 1909-Defender-CustomSecurity
Client-Windows 10 1909-Defender-MSFT
Client-Windows 10 1909-CredentialGuard-CustomSettings
Client-Windows 10 1909-CredentialGuard-CustomSecurity
Client-Windows 10 1909-CredentialGuard-MSFT
Client-Windows 10 1909-BitLocker-CustomSettings
Client-Windows 10 1909-BitLocker-CustomSecurity
Client-Windows 10 1909-BitLocker-MSFT
Client-Windows 10 1909-CustomSettings
Client-Windows 10 1909-CustomSecurity
Client-Windows 10 1909-MSFT
- Rick_Munck
Microsoft
Hi Chad Brower and thanks for the post! Brian Steingraber is pretty much spot on but please let me expand just a little. If we had the time we would absolutely go back and adjust the previous baselines but we have to continue to move forward and handle other new baselines from Office, Edge and soon some additional products on top of that. With that being said part of the reason we release the blog post on what we are changing is so consumers of the baseline can make informed decisions if they decide to run multiple baselines (per OS version). We of course encourage baseline consumer to always test the latest baseline before applying them to an older OS version but generally speaking the latest is always the greatest. However with that being said we do have a few customers that will WMI filter the baselines to the OS version (lot of work).
- Brian SteingraberCopper ContributorGreat question! I asked a similiar question quite a while ago and if memory serves, the newest/most recent baseline superseeds all previous baseline versions.
- Chad BrowerCopper Contributor
Brian Steingraber I am trying to remember where I might have read that before? I seem to remember maybe reading that before. Any doco out there for this?
Rick_Munck Same question then? Or perhaps a future blog post?
Thanks for the reply's guys!
- Brian SteingraberCopper Contributor
It wasn't in the specific posting, rather in the comments as I had ask a followup question in the comments of the original posting.
I think Aaron M w/Microsoft was the one that replied (also the original poster)