Forum Discussion
Server 2012R2 and Server 2016 not reporting WDATP sensor data
- Jul 16, 2019
Dave Elerick This functionality is a part of the Threat & Vulnerability Management feature.
Currently, only Windows 10/2019/1903 are supported. I'm led to believe the functionality will be backported into 2012R2/2016 at some point in the future
Dave Elerick This functionality is a part of the Threat & Vulnerability Management feature.
Currently, only Windows 10/2019/1903 are supported. I'm led to believe the functionality will be backported into 2012R2/2016 at some point in the future
Ok DannyC_Gamma , I understand. I guess that MSFT was a bit confusing then with their information and tools. Why would one even want to on-board 2012/2016 servers at this time then? They offer the tool (MMA agent). The current info and tools available on their on-boarding page would make sense if they plan to back-port that functionality, at least to 2016 given Defender is baked in. Odd, but now explainable. Thank you very much.
- fedecharoskyJul 17, 2019Copper Contributor
Just wondering if you have checked the ASC functionality for Server is not what you are looking for?
As far as I know WDATP is focused on Endpoint and when you install MMA on a Server, that ends up reporting to ASC for the three main panels (Compliance, Hygene and Threat Protection).
You will still benefit from the EDR side of it - but all the "other stuff" should be available in ASC, not WDATP.
- Dave ElerickJul 17, 2019Copper Contributor
I understand, but it looks like ASC is at additional cost correct? Right now we have O365 E5/EMS+E5/WDATP purchased. The WDATP Dashboard indicates yes, you can on-board systems via ASC or WDATP directly. When 2012R2/2016 is selected, it gives those two options. While I understand the function of ASC, it seems like the information is confusing as to how much of the WDATP you get with 2012R2/2016 servers. This is prelim work, as we are slated to have FastTrack services engaged in the coming month or so.
- fedecharoskyJul 20, 2019Copper ContributorI'm probably not the best person to answer, but AFAIK yes - ASC and WDATP have separate costs.
ASC charges you either consumption based (GB/Day which is the model Microsoft is unifying on) or node based (which is from the OMS days with Security & Compliance Tile, which I loved but I believe sadly we are losing).
WDATP charges you per Identity I believe.
- DannyC_GammaJul 16, 2019Copper ContributorYou still benefit from the EDR functionality so still very much worth deploying across your server estate, in my opinion. The Threat & Vulnerability stuff wasn't part of the original functionality and was seen as being very much a bonus for us.
I will agree that information wasn't great. Also, I seem to recall that, going back to late last year, the MMA wasn't required for 2016 Server. Shows that Microsoft are moving quickly with this product - the evolution has been fairly rapid.- Dave ElerickJul 16, 2019Copper Contributor
This is good info, I really appreciate your reply and your point on the EDR does make sense. Thanks again.