Forum Discussion
Introducing guest access for Office 365 Groups!
Does https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/active-directory-create-users/ help?
I see the settings (still in Preview) by going to the portal, selecting the AAD instance for my tenant, and then selecting the Configure tab. The User Access settings are towards the end. I don't think you need to go near these settings because the default values should allow guest access.
Thanks TOny, I have that all set - as you said they were already set. I could not find those settings in the new portal, only the old portal.
(side note - thanks for the screen shot you attached. I only noticed it when coming back to reply. They don't feature very prominently do they.... Attached images should really show a thumbnail)
I am seeing 'All/Owners/Guests' in the group I've set up, but still get a warning that only individuals from within the organisation can be added when I try to add someone external.
I realise it might be a number of days away. Is there any visual indication to know external group membership is active on your tenant, or do we just keep trying until it works?
- Sahil AroraSep 18, 2016Former Employee
Thanks David Rosenthal for the feedback! We take this feedback and include this datapoint in our planning.
- David RosenthalSep 16, 2016
Microsoft
Thanks TonyRedmond and Sahil Arora !
While having the PowerShell is nice, there is still some exposure there if a user shares something externally to a domain we do not allow. During that time period between the share occurring and some sort of automated job or utility running to scan all guest users to identify their domains and remove the ones we don't want, whatever was shared is exposed to the outside world. This will scare many IT departments into turning guest access off completely, or at best putting data sensitivity restrictions on what a Group is allowed to be used for. I'm assuming either of those scenarios is not the ultimate goal of Groups.
It would be much simpler, more effective, and less risky to simply query the tenant level whitelist or blacklist when the guest access sharing action occurs to see if the domain is allowed or not. If allowed, proceed as normal. If not allowed, throw the same error message that SharePoint does now when you attempt to share to a domain that is not allowed. I'm obviously not familiar with the exact inner workings of everything on your side of the fence, but this seems like a fairly simple and straighforward requirement that functionality already exists for - the connection is just not being made right now.
I personally love Groups, and I clearly see the vision of where it is headed and how it will make things better across the board in Office 365. Not having this sort of integration from the start makes this almost a non-starter to large enterprises that have a risk averse security department, which is becoming almost the norm these days. Even if added later, then it becomes a Change issue since I'll then have a huge battle to relocate teams who started using other solutions since Groups was not ready yet to fit their needs.
- Sahil AroraSep 14, 2016Former Employee
Thanks David for the feedback! Currently we don't honour Sharepoint Allow-List, that list for external sharing of SharePoint items not linked with Guests in groups, but as TonyRedmond has mentioned you should be able to remove the guests with black-listed domains with the Powershell script.
- TonyRedmondSep 14, 2016MVP
Those whitelists (defined in the Sharing section of the SharePoint Online Admin Center) control invitations for individual SharePoint items and not the addition of guest members to Office 365 Groups. However, it's easy to scan the membership of groups to find guests from forbidden domains and remove them. I have the PowerShell code to do that and will talk about it at Ignite (but you can figure it out yourself)!
- David RosenthalSep 14, 2016
Microsoft
Does Guest Access respect the tenant-level Allowlist (whitelist)?
We are seeing evidence that it does not, which our security team will not love at all. :(
- Brian MatherSep 13, 2016Brass ContributorAnd how about when you click and nothing happens so you click again and then you get a duplicate post !! ;)
- LizP1Sep 13, 2016Iron Contributor
This is VERY helpful - thanks darrellaas. I was getting a little tired of downloading every pic... :smileyhappy:
And while I'm here, back onto the thread topic - we've hit the ground running and have set up private Outlook Groups with external members for about four projects just today. Conversations are flowing, files are being saved into the group folder and plans are being made in Planner. Loving. It.
- TonyRedmondSep 13, 2016MVP
The stupid avatar makes my ear look pretty though...
- Sep 12, 2016LOL
- Sep 12, 2016How about when it screws up profile circles so they create a beautiful oval frame of your ear Tony?
- Sep 12, 2016How about when it screws up profile circles so they create a beautiful oval frame of your ear Tony?
- TonyRedmondSep 10, 2016MVP
So I shall chalk my frustrating experience with Photos to the list of other issues with this new network.... Tant pis.
- darrellaasSep 10, 2016MVP
I'm using Chrome too and it has happily eaten the photos I spoon-fed it. Your screenshot wasn't too big a mouthful for Chrome to swallow.
- TonyRedmondSep 10, 2016MVP
Good theory, but I tried to add the screenshot as a photo and the browser (Chrome) barfed. So I didn't.
- darrellaasSep 10, 2016MVP
Hi Brian Mather and TonyRedmond. Here's a tip aside of the conversation topic that will help when sharing screenshots. Add "Photos" rather than "Choose Files". Photos will appear in the the body of the post. "Choose Files" is more suited to attaching documents.
(I'm catching up with the conversation and wanted to offer this to help future conversations.)
- VasilMichevSep 10, 2016MVP
Thanks Tony, definitely not happy about that bit though. We did indeed discuss it back on the OTN in the context of "every user in the company being able to delete files from any Public Group". Now it's the same all over, even though the MSFT folks seemed to agree at the time that some changes might be for the best...
- David SlightSep 10, 2016Iron ContributorYes, either you are on the "team" or you are not. Nothing slows things down across collaboration than finding out a team member did not have access or didn't see something that was shared. If you need sub levels of guest then I would use another construct and lets keep groups for highly effective teams.
- SanthoshB1Sep 10, 2016Bronze ContributorIMHO, Since Groups files is maintained in Shared Documents, that portion won't be changed. Whereas the other parts of the site can have SharePoint style permissions and also we can use Office 365 Groups for assigning permissions.
- TonyRedmondSep 10, 2016MVP
While standardization is good, Office 365 Groups are a rather special construct where a central idea is that all members of a group - including guest users - share a common level of access to group resources. Now this isn't strictly true for guest users because they don't have direct access to the group mailbox, but it holds valid for the SharePoint resources. Unlike permissions that are granted to an individual user who has a specific and recognizable identity, you'd have to be able to go to a lower level and support different permissions within members who hold a common identity - and that is where the problem lies.
- Salvatore BiscariSep 10, 2016Silver Contributor
I appreciate your careful approach and I agree with you.
Nevertheless, as pointed out by VasilMichev, I think that, for example, restricting guests to be visitors and not full members, will be a common requirement.
Hence I hope that with the introduction of Group team sites MS will eliminate any "specialness" from Group access, rendering it completely "standard" as in SharePoint.
- TonyRedmondSep 10, 2016MVP
I don't want to avoid answering the question, but I do think that we need to wait and see what is possible after the full roll-out of team sites for groups is completed. The issue right now is that group access is "special" and very different to SharePoint-style access. When groups have the full functionality of team sites available, it might be possible to play with permissions. So I think we have to wait a little while longer and then see whether it is possible to assign different document-level permissions to different members within a group.
- Salvatore BiscariSep 10, 2016Silver Contributor
Tony, I remember that some time ago (still in the Yammer network) you advised against fiddling with permissions in a Group doclib. Do you still think the same?
IMHO, with the introduction of guests and team sites to Groups, in many cases it will be really necessary to customize the permissions. Don't you think so?
- TonyRedmondSep 10, 2016MVP
Delighted to clarify... A guest user is a group member. Apart from group owners, who can administer the group, there is no distiction between the rights of different group members. A guest user has exactly the same level of access to group files and the notebook as possessed by other group members. And yes, this means that a guest user can delete files from the library should they feel so inclined. Basically, don't invite guest users whom you don't trust - or segregrate documents that guest users need to access into specific groups.
- VasilMichevSep 09, 2016MVP
The Guests tab appeared in my tenant, but now I get error saying to ask my admin for help :) Guests are enabled in the settings, guess I have to wait a bit more.
In the meantime, can anyone clarify what kind of access Guests get to Files, and are we able to modify this? By default I mean, so we can avoid the "Guest deleted all the group files" scenario.
- David SlightSep 09, 2016Iron Contributor
I think I am half way there - see attached screenshot - am seeing the SHARING panel in Security & Privacy but still getting an error when I try ro add someone. Wait a bit more I suppose ...