Forum Discussion

EricBBB's avatar
EricBBB
Copper Contributor
Jul 10, 2024
Solved

Entra OU sync vs group filtering

Hello, Currently, we are utilising Microsoft 365 Business Standard with a free Entra ID, but we also have a trial version of M365 Business Premium that I would like to test for a couple of users and...
  • LainRobertson's avatar
    Jul 10, 2024

    EricBBB 

     

    Hi, Eric.

     

    There's no categorically right or wrong answer here, but since you've mentioned "testing", I'd recommend using the group filtering option.

     

    You mentioned that AAD Connect is not destructive, and to some extent that is true. But it has to be noted that if through normal Active Directory administration, you scope someone out of synchronisation, they do get soft-deleted by AAD Connect, and under default conditions, that means they will be permanently deleted 30 days after the soft delete.

     

    Once you're ready to exit your test phase, you can readily re-run the configuration wizard (or PowerShell, if you're comfortable with the command line) to no longer use group filtering.

     

    Just make sure you're matching of the on-premise identities to the existing Azure AD identities is solid, or you might face some interesting outcomes if they end up mismatching. This is where group filtering can pay off, since it's harder to "accidentally" scope too many people in or out of synchronisation, and high importance identities - such as executives - can remain confidently immune from such accidents while you're testing.

     

    There's nothing complicated about selecting the organisational units. Just select the ones (a tick will be displayed in their checkbox) you wish to make eligible for synchronisation in the tree. Any that you do not select - or later deselect - will not feature in the synchronisation (where deselection post synchronisation leads back to what I mentioned above about falling out of scope, soft- and permanent deletion).

     

    Cheers,

    Lain

Resources