We are actively planning content for CU1 for BizTalk Server 2020. If there is anything you like product group to consider for this, please add to this conversation.

SanjivGupta It would be nice to have Send Ports retry interval in seconds rather than minutes, which would be suitable for quickly recovering from transient errors in request-response integration scenarios.

I was surprised that the application restriction was not removed in this version.

Remove the 5 applications limit in Standard Edition, as promised in BizTalk vNext.

SanjivGupta A little bit large "out there" but a method of unit-testing orchestrations individually from a test-framework etc. Windows Admin Centre support

SanjivGupta And you know what, whilst I'm here posting out-landish ideas.- An option to allow administrators (maybe via a database level flag) to export bindings with passwords- A method of overriding/ignoring dependency restrictions when deploying (providing unenlisted). With complex dependencies, it can often be infuriating to have to clear up all instances and remove dozens of applications to release an updated common pipeline.- An entirely programmatic alternative to an Orchestration (e.g. via a .net interface, like pipelines). Along with my previous comment about testing, this is attractive as it is more modular with conventional development tools.- I've not even tried to explore this subject, but how well does BTS play with docker and kubernates, something for the future?

BizTalk Server 2020 CU1 | Microsoft Community Hub

39 Replies

Alastair Grant
Brass Contributor
Mar 13, 2020
SanjivGupta

A little bit large "out there" but a method of unit-testing orchestrations individually from a test-framework etc.

Windows Admin Centre support
NealWalters
Copper Contributor
Mar 12, 2020
SanjivGupta
When you do a Test Map, it looks like SAXON error are not being captured and show in the Visual Studio Output Windows:

https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/4b901a71-0637-430e-9be9-2a043c73e0df/biztalk-2020-visual-studio-2019-bug-report-with-xslt-30?forum=biztalkgeneral
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/4b901a71-0637-430e-9be9-2a043c73e0df/biztalk-2020-visual-studio-2019-bug-report-with-xslt-30?forum=biztalkgeneral

Thanks,
Neal Walters
- SanjivGupta
  Microsoft
  Mar 13, 2020
  NealWalters Noted!
  
  Will look into it.
leoerlandsson
Copper Contributor
Mar 12, 2020
Remove the 5 applications limit in Standard Edition, as promised in BizTalk vNext.
- SanjivGupta
  Microsoft
  Mar 12, 2020
  leoerlandsson
  
  This is a business decision, not a bug. We may not be able to handle such a request in a CU scope. Being familiar with BizTalk, I am sure you are aware of the limitations we have for CU.
  
  I thank you for your response.
hichamveo hichamveo
Copper Contributor
Mar 12, 2020
Add polling interval feature on ASB Adapter. On the fly message consumption is risky and can create a high traffic on Biztalk MessageBox
- SanjivGupta
  Microsoft
  Mar 12, 2020
  hichamveo hichamveo
  
  We will look into it.
  
  Just to be sure, please clarify ASB for me.
  - hichamveo hichamveo
    Copper Contributor
    Mar 12, 2020
    ASB: Azure Service Bus (SB-Messaging connector)
Enrico2103
MCT
Mar 12, 2020
Hi
there is some problems where you try to delete a BizTalk Application with reference to another application by BizTalk Administration Console and/or command line . Sometime show an error that is impossible to do that. See my next blog for workaround https://www.enricozerilli.com/l/delete-biztalk-application-frol-biztalk-mng-db/
Best regards
SanjivGupta
- SanjivGupta
  Microsoft
  Mar 12, 2020
  Enrico2103
  
  We will look into it.
  
  I thank you for your response.
fernandopires
Copper Contributor
Mar 12, 2020
I was surprised that the application restriction was not removed in this version.

Forum Discussion

BizTalk Server 2020 CU1

39 Replies

Resources