Is Power Automate Becoming the New Technical Debt in Dynamics 365 Projects?

Power Automate has transformed how organisations build automation within Dynamics 365 and the Power Platform. Teams can automate processes quickly, reduce manual effort, and deliver business value without extensive custom development. At the same time, I have noticed an interesting challenge in some organizations as Power Platform adoption matures.

Over time, hundreds of flows can be created by different teams, often with varying levels of governance, documentation, and ownership. Business logic may become distributed across multiple automations, making troubleshooting, maintenance, and long-term support more complex. On the other hand, many organisations have successfully scaled Power Automate by implementing strong governance practices and automation standards.

I'm interested in hearing different perspectives from the community.

Have you seen Power Automate become difficult to manage at scale, or has it reduced technical debt in your organization?

What governance, architecture, or operational practices have worked best for balancing innovation with maintainability?