Forum Discussion
VM Disk Size
tdickieson - One thing that I want to point out is that there is a general paradigm shift when you switch from a physical lab to using Azure Lab Services. A key difference is that Azure Lab Services is designed to spin up and tear down labs quickly as your needs change - typically, we recommend that you have 1 lab per class so that you only need to install the software for that one particular class and then when the class is over, you tear it down again. This is different compared to a physical lab that is shared by multiple classes and that requires all classes' software be installed at the same time. In most cases, if you create 1 lab per class, this typically reduces the amount of software that must be installed at one time within the lab and then reduces disk size needs. However, there are sometimes exceptions that a particular piece of software requires a larger disk size - if you have this situation, let us know.
Microsofttdickieson - One thing that I want to point out is that there is a general paradigm shift when you switch from a physical lab to using Azure Lab Services. A key difference is that Azure Lab Services is designed to spin up and tear down labs quickly as your needs change - typically, we recommend that you have 1 lab per class so that you only need to install the software for that one particular class and then when the class is over, you tear it down again. This is different compared to a physical lab that is shared by multiple classes and that requires all classes' software be installed at the same time. In most cases, if you create 1 lab per class, this typically reduces the amount of software that must be installed at one time within the lab and then reduces disk size needs. However, there are sometimes exceptions that a particular piece of software requires a larger disk size - if you have this situation, let us know.
Thanks for the response. I do understand the paradigm shift, and I'm all for it! I guess for one we do run into these "edge case" exceptions with very large software packages. Especially as some of these applications require a substantial data set to ingest or export and there insufficent space on the disk. I understand there are work arounds for this, which we are leveraging (i.e. file shares, blob storage, etc.). It's just that it would certainly be much more efficient in some cases to just have a slightly larger disk or ability to attach a second disk.
In the higher education context, another situation we run into is when one professor, teaching one course, requires multiple applications for remote instruction. We end up having to create multiple VMs for each student (even though they are in one course) and make sure the students use the correct VM per application. When they need to feed the output from one application as input for another application, well, you see how this starts to get overly complicated.
Again, I appreciate the response. We are using various work arounds right now. I just thought it might be helpful to just leave some feedback on our particular use cases as I figured there may be others in the same situation. Having the option would certainly help sell this solution to more audiences in our space.