Forum Discussion
ThatsSecurity
May 28, 2019Copper Contributor
Azure Advanced Threat Protection Licensing for who
Someone can answer to this problem ? If the company X have YK employees (ex 4000) how many license and of which type you mentioned are needed ? So for example a single forest, single domain with...
Nicholas DiCola (SECURITY JEDI)
Microsoft
May 29, 2019Hi,
AATP is licensed in several ways. you can purchase AATP standalone licenses, EMS E5 licenses, M365 E5 licenses.
You need to license each user account for real people you have. in your example 4000 employees would mean 4000 licenses.
- angelnclMay 30, 2019Copper Contributorand what happens if I have 5000 users of active directory (local) and only 3000 users synchronized to office 365?
- Nicholas DiCola (SECURITY JEDI)May 30, 2019
Microsoft
Hi
the # of users sync't to O365 is irrelevant. AATP enumerates the entities from on-prem AD. if you have 5000 user accounts, and 4000 employees, i assume you have 1000 service accounts? if so, than you are fine. if the other 1000 are real humans you need to license them.
- ThatsSecurityMay 29, 2019Copper Contributor
Thanks for answering
You need to license each user account for real people you have. in your example 4000 employees would mean 4000 licenses.
can you please provide a link to the standalone license? I cant find anywhere in internet
- Nicholas DiCola (SECURITY JEDI)May 30, 2019
Microsoft
it is mentioned here. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure-advanced-threat-protection/atp-technical-faq#where-can-i-get-a-license-for-azure-advanced-threat-protection-atp
you likely need to work with your microsoft seller / re-seller.
- squickerJan 13, 2020Copper Contributor
Nicholas DiCola (SECURITY JEDI)
Hi apologies for the necro but I'd like to clarify this point.
If the AD has 20000 user objects (some admin accounts, some generic accounts, some service accounts) but only 11000 actual users, do we have to licence every user account in AD (both admin and user but not service accounts), or only the 11000 user accounts pertaining to real people?
i.e. some users have two accounts due to admin privileges, the assumption is we must licence both accounts as it is accounts that we are protecting?