Forum Discussion
Nashaat Sorial
Dec 23, 2018Copper Contributor
ATP sensor Consume most server CPU (60%)
It is observed after installing ATP sensor, on domain controller, that more than 60 % of 16 cores CPU are consumed by microsoft.tri.sensor.exe component
mesaqee
Mar 03, 2021Copper Contributor
Dear EliOfek ,
The server is based on a VM, attached are the complete hardware specs. The busy packets/sec=511 and max packets/sec=32,295.
Please see below the complete sizing tool output:
DC | Sensor Supported | Failed Samples | Max Packets/sec | Avg Packets/sec | Busy Packets/sec | Busy Packets/sec Start Time | Busy Packets/sec End Time | Min Avail MB | Avg Avail MB | Busy Avail MB | Busy RAM Start Time | Busy RAM End Time | Total MB | Max % CPU Time | Avg % CPU Time | Busy % CPU Time | Busy CPU Start Time | Busy CPU End Time | Logical processors | Processor Groups | Core Count | VM Indicator | AD Site | Time Zone Name | Is DST | OS Caption | OS Build Number | OS Installation Type | OS Server Levels |
XXXXX | Yes, but additional resources required: +1GB; +1 core | 8 | 32,295 | 105 | 511 | 19:51:52 | 20:21:50 | 2,366 | 4,349 | 3,323 | 17:12:16 | 17:42:14 | 8,191 | 100 | 50 | 98 | 2:17:12 | 2:47:30 | 2 | 1 | 2 | VMWare | XXXXX | (UTC+08:00) Beijing, Chongqing, Hong Kong, Urumqi | Microsoft Windows Server 2019 Standard | 17763 | Server | ServerCore; ServerCoreExtended; Server-Gui-Mgmt; Server-Gui-Shell |
EliOfek
Microsoft
Mar 03, 2021Was one core added as suggested?
While the busy packets are low, the max is pretty high...
Is the high CPU you noticed is constant or spikes on certain hours ?
While the busy packets are low, the max is pretty high...
Is the high CPU you noticed is constant or spikes on certain hours ?
- mesaqeeMar 03, 2021Copper ContributorNo, the core hasn't be added as this issue has started coming up since last week only. The spike has been there almost constantly. We are still monitoring that to evaluate if this is intermittent or a consistent issue. Do you have any other suggestions apart from the core addition?
- EliOfekMar 04, 2021
Microsoft
Check the packets/sec on all the nics, or re run the sizing tool, maybe there was an increase of traffic load on this machine, but nothing seems wrong here , especially if the sizing tool asked for another core and it wasn't deployed.- mesaqeeMar 23, 2021Copper Contributor
DearEliOfek ,
The issue is still there even after increasing the server capacity.
We re-ran the sizing tool, and here are the results:
DC Sensor Supported Failed Samples Max Packets/sec Avg Packets/sec Busy Packets/sec Busy Packets/sec Start Time Busy Packets/sec End Time Min Avail MB Avg Avail MB Busy Avail MB Busy RAM Start Time Busy RAM End Time Total MB Max % CPU Time Avg % CPU Time Busy % CPU Time Busy CPU Start Time Busy CPU End Time Logical processors Processor Groups Core Count VM Indicator AD Site Time Zone Name Is DST OS Caption OS Build Number OS Installation Type OS Server Levels XXXXX.local Yes 0 2,264 139 181 09:51:47 10:06:45 4,623 5,193 4,725 04:03:52 04:18:49 10,239 100 11 69 12:58:17 13:13:20 4 1 4 VMWare HXXXX (UTC+08:00) Beijing, Chongqing, Hong Kong, Urumqi Microsoft Windows Server 2019 Standard 17763 Server Remote Registry Query Failed Appreciate if you can provide some more insights around this.
Thanks,
Saqib