MicrosoftI posted this in Uservoice too, but I've found that feature parity may not be there quite yet (vs. MMC-base Perfmon). A few things I've run into:
1. Seems like some objects are missing (where is "SMB Client Shares"?)
2. I'd expect to be able to add counters with the same unit to the same line graph panel. However in Physical Disk when I attempt to add both disk sec/read and disk sec/write to the same panel the line graph shifts to a report format.
3. It seems like the workspace export has limited portability. The JSON file very specifically defines what's in-scope for the workspace. If I select all instances and the system where I'm defining the workspace has drives C and E the JSON file shows those instances. What happens if/when I try to import that into a system with drives C and S?
Am I just missing something/somethings? Is there a list that defines where feature parity doesn't exist? TIA!
