I think you will find I was one of the earliest responders to this thread and switched to insiders to test it out and had a good go at testing it out for a vhd boot to insiders.
That was over a year ago. 4 years after it should have been.
The issue you do not seem to appreciate is this feature only available on fast (Dev) ring insiders which keeps moving forward with new features and breaks often.
In that entire year this feature has not moved from fast ring (Dev) to slow ring (beta) or the early release ring. It's just stick in Dev ring for 1 year plus.
I've been following this thread since this feature announcement waiting for it to move out of Dev branch for a very very long time.
I'm not sure I agree with you about wanting the max features needing to pay top whack, or wanting a basic spec paying the lower cost of AMD. There is such a thing as a group of people who want the best bang for buck. Pay a fair price for a fair product and expect it to work.
While you may or may not consider use cases for nested HV as important for AMD users, AMD clearly disagrees. AMD sees this feature as important enough to include it within the CPU package. The only problem here is Microsoft.
So I'm glad we both agree there are no alternatives outside of switching to Intel hardware to get nested virtualization on HV. And I'm glad you accept that there are no other reasnoble alternatives and AMD processors are gimped under windows for no good reason.
(Your response to buy Intel if you want that feature makes it clear).
So let me get this right. Your professional advice is to replace my hardware in order to use features that the CPU supports and the OS does not purely because Microsoft is dragging their feet?
Ok man. Whatever.
And by the way monkey/child/rude comments,. Thanks very much a appreciate your responses. The fact that you cannot answer me with a decent alternative reply other than to go out and buy an Intel CPU proves my point entirely.
./thread I guess.
The end of the Nested AMD on hyperv in windows question is: go out and buy an Intel instead or shut up and wait.
You will only receive respect and high effort messages from me if I do not determine you to be a total retard.
The fact that you told me to go and buy another CPU/motherboard/system/laptop only to get passthrough virtualization extensions to vm os's and believe that's fair and reasnoble and not anti-competitive behaviour by Microsoft tells me everything I need to know.
Thanks very much for your professional advice.
Brb I'm about to burn my Ryzen 3600 desktop and my Ryzen 4800u laptop and go out and buy brand new replacement hardware right now due to your brilliant advice telling me to go and get Intel instead, and somehow that is not anti competitive.
I also note I am an unprofessional monkey for thinking that is wrong.
Thanks for your advice man 🙂 it's brilliant.