MicrosoftI think scrapping AZ-204 needlessly opens a large gap in training needs. A lot of .NET Azure shops are using solutions such as App Service, Blob Storage, using event based and serverless workloads etc to run microservice backends. They're not building AI apps. AZ-204 is well respected among backend developers. AI-200 is not a substitute for this clear need.
MicrosoftHello,
Thanks for your interest in our certifications. Our goal with evolving and launching new certifications to help our learners meet latest skilling needs (and help bridge skilling gaps). AI-200 focuses on the skills developers need to deliver solutions on Azure with demanding performance and responsiveness requirements. The course covers similar ground as AZ-204, but with a greater focus on code and observability. The certification will let developers show they can deliver solutions on Azure with a variety of architectural requirements.
It's the same as they sent all .net Certifications to /dev/null. Makes no sense. Still today I have multiple requests per month for official Microsoft .net courses because the customers want to hear what Microsoft has to say how to use their developer platform! And now with the only class for developers regarding Azure the same thing. I'm a MCT since 2005 and Microsoft certified since 1998, but the last 10 years the trainings have gone worse. There are customer demanding and it seems that there's no interest from Microsoft to fullfill these damands to use their technologies. I don't get it. This is really sad. Regarding to the "new" AI-200: There are missing so much modules which are important for many of my customeres here in Germany and Austria which where included in AZ204 like API Management, Web App Services, AUthentication and Authorization... I really think Microsoft should overthink this decission, because Azure (and also .net) are so cool developer plattforms!
Thanks for the reply PujaA. The blog description states that AI-200 focuses on building, integrating and monitoring 'AI solutions'. This sounds quite different to what you are saying, which is similar ground as AZ-204 but with a greater focus on 'code and observability', which sounds much more reasonable.
I don't agree with MSFT's decision to retire AZ-204 and replace it with AI-200.
Many developers have been renewing the AZ-204 certification through the annual renewal assessment.
When the certification is being renewed every year, what is the purpose of that renewal process if the certification itself is going to be discontinued? From my perspective, this gives me confusion and reduces the perceived value of maintaining the certification through renewals.
If MSFT's concern is that the current exam content is outdated or does not sufficiently reflect modern development practices (especially AI), it might be more effective to improve and update the exam objectives and questions rather than retiring the certification.
AZ-204 has historically covered core Azure developer skills such as compute services, storage, security, integration, and deployment.
These are still fundamental skills for building applications on Azure regardless of whether AI is involved.
In my view, it would make more sense to evolve AZ-204 by modernising its objectives (for example adding better observability, performance engineering, and modern architecture practices) rather than retiring and repositioning it under an "AI" category.
