it nice that you are making it easier to manage in bulk. but shame it was not taken into account the full impact. like it was not did not consider how much customization may have been done to the rule, across customers. even just in terms of rule naming e.g adding a reference number. that gets wiped out when using the solutions or updating, or additional mapping made from UEBA as well as how for regulated environments this could create issue in documented flows for change control and auditing.
there is feature missing e.g in the filters looking by data source e.g azure AAD, techniques or tactic, can confirming what rules were pertinent to the environment, that was available as filters under rule templates,
it would have been nice to have a count on the solution tile to how any of the rules are already in use.
so from an audit point we are back to exporting items in the backend and using excel to check. before the auditor could just look at the rule template list or via the connector and next steps could confirm via the GUI that Due diligence was in place.
its a shame as this change comes across more like a money grab from MS to open it up as a market place for vendors to sell there module. when before it was very much innovated from the community so could undermine one of the main market leading feature in the platform. as it only as good as its logs and detections