Folks over on Clustering and High Availability blog have decided to (re)start their blog. Seems like they have lined up some good content which they should start posting soon (January 2008 is here ...
Updated Jul 01, 2019
Version 2.0
Blog Post
Question,
Since the release of server 2008 and Exchange 2007 Sp1
I am looking into the CCR solution but seperating the Active and Passive MB servers. I understand that you still have a single witness file service running on one hub transport.
And that failover may still have a split brain issuse.
But for clarification,
Site A - MS, CAS, HUB with WF Router Site B - MB, CAS, HUB
I would use a Exchange Server CName Record to point to site A active MB server.
During fail-over the CNAME would be updated to point to Site B MB server.
I would manually have to bring site A back up, once network connectivity was re-established.
ALso, I am assuming all of this is done over the public network with no private network required? Or do I need a public and private network to make this work?
thanks
Darrin
Since the release of server 2008 and Exchange 2007 Sp1
I am looking into the CCR solution but seperating the Active and Passive MB servers. I understand that you still have a single witness file service running on one hub transport.
And that failover may still have a split brain issuse.
But for clarification,
Site A - MS, CAS, HUB with WF Router Site B - MB, CAS, HUB
I would use a Exchange Server CName Record to point to site A active MB server.
During fail-over the CNAME would be updated to point to Site B MB server.
I would manually have to bring site A back up, once network connectivity was re-established.
ALso, I am assuming all of this is done over the public network with no private network required? Or do I need a public and private network to make this work?
thanks
Darrin