...that we blogged about here. What's new, you ask? Quite a bit... we've been busy. We have changed the way you input transaction log growth. In the previous versions you had to enter how ...
Updated Jul 01, 2019
Version 2.0
Blog Post
2 MIN READ
We updated the Exchange 2007 Mailbox Storage Requirements Calculator (again)...
In the storage calculator, can someone validate and explain why having a dedicated restore LUN reduces the size of the database disk store? For example:
1000 Mailboxes
100MB Size
No to Cont. Replication
and then depending on Yes or No to dedicated restore lun you have either:
YES...
Database Disk 270GB
Total Log 120GB
Restore LUN 392GB
Total = 782GB
or NO to dedicated restore lun
Database Disk 522GB
Total Log 277GB
Restore LUN = 0
Total = 799GB
so, disabling dedicated restore increases total storage needed per server?
1000 Mailboxes
100MB Size
No to Cont. Replication
and then depending on Yes or No to dedicated restore lun you have either:
YES...
Database Disk 270GB
Total Log 120GB
Restore LUN 392GB
Total = 782GB
or NO to dedicated restore lun
Database Disk 522GB
Total Log 277GB
Restore LUN = 0
Total = 799GB
so, disabling dedicated restore increases total storage needed per server?