We’ve heard your concerns and take them seriously. We’re looking into what we can do to improve this situation for you, nothing definitive yet but be assured we’re working on it and will post an up...
Updated Jul 01, 2019
Version 2.0
Blog Post
@Bharat - yes we noticed this isn't the first time you have changed documentation on us, but this is the first time you have given us the opportunity to voice our frustration on this action in a single location.
No that you are, but please don't take the approach of "you didn't complain last time" because if you had made a post such as this the last time we certainly would have.
And just to be clear, we are asking that you NOT change the topic of your published articles (Exchange 2013 versus Exchange 2010) any more than you would a technet artcile, white paper, or even published book. Revisions, tweaks, clarifications are fine and encouraged, but changing the source topic on a published artcile is like trying to change the Exchange version in a book you have already published and people have purchased. You wouldn't do it in that case, so why do it in all of the other cases where people use the electronic published versions of data?
Links to new product version articles in existing articles = yes, changing existing articles to be the new product version and then providing a new link to the older data = no.