KC,
Your comment seems quite disingenuous.
Strikingly, after conducting a word for word comparison of the original and modified versions, this was the ONLY material deleted!
WORSE, the text that they "restored" is significantly different from the text they deleted! One has to wonder why they simply didn't paste back the original wording... Here is the NEW wording:
"Licensees of the Exchange ActiveSync protocol can take advantage of these improvements through updates to their messaging applications or devices. The roadmap for those devices is owned and managed by the licensee."
Hmmmm, they LEFT OUT THE NAMES of the EAS licensees. That seems a little strange, doesn't it? Especially since they were there before!
Again, at this point, as I understand it, there are about a million Treo 650s that could utilize Direct Push tomorrow, with just a minor update to their pre-installed VersaMail application.
Why isn't ANYONE talking about THAT?!?!? And by anyone, I mean the numerous professional journalists busy reporting on everything BUT this....
The possible choices:
Microsoft won't let Palm update the Treo 650. (newsworthy?)
Palm "decided on its own" to not update the Treo 650. (newsworthy?)
Either Palm or Microsoft or both of them together ARE going to update the Treo 650. (newsworthy?)