Uh oh. You are probably thinking to yourself, here comes another one of those incredibly long blog posts about sizing. Thankfully, it’s not. If you want to fully understand the sizing process for Exchange 2016, you are certainly welcome to read the previous post that I did for Exchange 2013, as the overall process is effectively the same with one major caveat. Since we have eliminated the CAS role in Exchange 2016, you must follow the process for multi-role deployment sizing. Overall, the inputs to our sizing formulas stay the same from Exchange 2013 to Exchange 2016. This means that our IOPS requirements, memory requirements, and all of the other values provided in the Exchange 2013 sizing guidance should continue to be used for Exchange 2016. We are changing one set of inputs, however.
Processor requirements
We are slightly increasing the processor requirements for Exchange 2016 (compared to Exchange 2013) as this is a very new release, and we are still learning how it performs in production. This slight increase in CPU provides some additional headroom for unanticipated issues, and may be changed in the future as we learn more from our internal deployments as well as customer feedback. The same SPECint_rate2006 baseline value described in the Exchange 2013 guidance should continue to be used (33.75 per-core).
Messages sent or received per mailbox per day | Mcycles per User, Active DB Copy or Standalone | Mcycles per User, Passive DB Copy |
50 | 2.99 | 0.70 |
100 | 5.97 | 1.40 |
150 | 8.96 | 2.10 |
200 | 11.94 | 2.80 |
250 | 14.93 | 3.50 |
300 | 17.91 | 4.20 |
350 | 20.90 | 4.90 |
400 | 23.88 | 5.60 |
450 | 26.87 | 6.30 |
500 | 29.85 | 7.00 |
These changes are reflected in v7.8 and later in the calculator.
System scalability
The previously released guidance on maximum recommended cores and maximum memory size for Exchange 2013 is generally applicable to Exchange 2016 in terms of background and general scalability issues, however we have increased the recommended maximum memory size for currently supported versions of Exchange 2016 to 192GB. We recommend not exceeding the following sizing characteristics for Exchange 2016 servers.
Recommended Maximum Processor Core Count |
24 |
Recommended Maximum Memory |
192 GB |
Note: Version 9.1 and later of the Exchange Server Role Requirements Calculator aligns with this guidance.
Summary
If you are at all familiar with the process for sizing the last couple of Exchange releases, you will be very comfortable with Exchange 2016. As with any new release, you should plan to roll-out in stages and monitor the health and performance of the solution carefully. We do expect that our performance and scalability guidance for Exchange 2016 will evolve over the lifespan of the product so watch the Exchange team blog for future updates.
Jeff Mealiffe
Principal PM Manager Office 365 Customer Experience