Hi @SecPmCj thank you for your valueable article. Would you like to add
words on nartac IIS crypt? It helps to understand Windows Server Crypto,
cipher, orders and read and configure these. Of not limited to IIS but
also Windows Server and Client in General and Server products such as
Exchange Serve...
Sorry to hijack these comments but would like to ask the crowd here if
they noticed these two phenomenon about Search-MailboxAuditLog,
particularly in my case for Shared mailboxes, but I'm not sure that has
any bearing on the issue. 1.) When you use Recover Deleted Items (i.e.,
items are in the Reco...
@Eric_Lawrence Thank you for the clarification and the excellent
reference article. I had forgotten that strong naming and Authenticode
are different things. I was not strong naming the assembly, only
Authenticode signing which was definitely successful.
@Thehetz What steps specifically did you use to strong name the file?
Strong Naming is a different sort of signature than Authenticode; you
can Authenticode-sign binaries without Strong Naming them. (Fiddler does
this, for example).
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4469646/net-strong-naming-vs-au...
After successful signing, running sn -v on the signed files returns
"<Filename> does not represent a strongly named assembly." The signtool
reports that the assembly was signed successfully, and my service is
setup correctly as far as I can tell. What could be the reason for this?
Latest Comments