User Profile
Wittycat
Iron Contributor
Joined Aug 09, 2019
User Widgets
Recent Discussions
365 Godaddy and infomaniak/proton mail
Hello, i have a little problem with Microsoft 365 and external domain. Because Microsoft 365 (not business version), require GoDaddy i have to migrate it from infomaniak to GoDaddy, and my other mail aren't moved. But now when i send a mail to infomaniak it never arrive. and infomaniak can't send me a mail (refused). And between Microsoft accounts all work, between Gmail and Microsoft all work, and with the "normal" @outlook account it work from and to infomaniak. So i think it's a domain/DNS problem, but i can't really say. It's the first time i work with domain on Microsoft services mxtoolbox tell me to add a DMARC policy i doesn't think it was that but i have tried anyway and as predicted it doesn't have solved the problem so i have removed all record and redoing the autoconfiguration of Microsoft and … it doesn't worked and redo the config like i have posted (i have replaced number by XX because it seem some of them like the account). I have asked help to infomaniak and Microsoft, but Microsoft send me to GoDaddy (and i don't really in these time have time to stay 3 hour on phone, and have asked microsoft if they can check on their end at least (not replied for now)) and infomaniak doesn't have responded yet so i ask to the tech community in case of someone know, because since some email provider (infomaniak) don't work i'm afraid to miss some mail. Thanks in advance CNAME autodiscover autodiscover.outlook.com 1 heure CNAME _domainconnect _domainconnect.gd.domaincontrol.com 1 heure MX @ XXXX.pamx1.hotmail.com (Priorité : 0) 1 heure NS @ nsXX.domaincontrol.com 1 heure NS @ nsXX.domaincontrol.com 1 heure SOA @ Serveur de noms principal : nsXX.domaincontrol.com. 1 heure TXT @ v=spf1 include:outlook.com -all 1 heure TXT _outlook XXXX 1 heureSolved2.4KViews0likes2CommentsQuestion about password exportability protection
Hello, Since some version we can force to ask authorisation from Windows Hello to have access to password, but i have an important question about that. Does it apply too on external software who read directly the database often in python. So in other word is the database file (stored on the computer) encrypted (or locked) to prevent access from external software ? Thanks for the answer490Views0likes0CommentsQuestion about Microsoft Auth IOS
Hello i acutally use microsoft Auth for passwordless account, but i actually have a solid question. Actually the save are done to Icloud (ios app) for my 2fa OTP account. My question is if i go to android how can i send them from ios to android ? Other question, is it possible on microsoft account to remove the mandatory email connection and replace it with other security than sms (like for instance Yubikey) Because using email or sms as emergency connection weaken a lot the security. ThanksJust to let you know that i don't have any bug
Hello, just to want to tell you that my computer on W11 Pro Beta chanel up to date. Ryzen 2 2700X, NVME SSD as drive (and all other ar NVME or SSD), NVIDIA 2060 Super (with windows 11 driver), ftpm enabled and secureboot enabled. Don't show any bug (at least not i have seen) at all on the beta chanel. I know this post will not help many, but telling the dev if a particular setup work perfectly can maybe help them. That's all ^^400Views1like1CommentSecurity of Extension and Software from GitHub to Store
Hello i want a discuss a thing. I actually have a very Hight level of security rules applied on my network/computer (Hardware and software), but it seem there is a hole in the transparency we can have a software engineer. For instance, i have in my security policy explained how my hardware and software security during development and test of my extension are done and with whom software. But the hole rely in the upload to the Microsoft Store of the code stored on GitHub, i want to know if actually or later is possible to deploy as an update to the partner center (where we upload these extension/software to Microsoft store) directly without having to pass by a zip on the computer, (and add a flags on the store page (or GitHub page) that is done). I ask this to totally eliminate the reliance on trust that the developer has really uploaded the same version on the Store (minus the signature of file added by Microsoft) that the one on GitHub. I actually know that some user/dev will not like that (like any security update (see windows 11 tpm enforcement to understand), but transparency and security is now something very important. Hope to see constructive answer on how i can achieve that even if GitHub / Store don't propose it.850Views0likes0CommentsRe: Exeption of microsoft
Actually (for now), computer in some services even not allowed to access to internet. But here is more for the "test" services, with this feature it let them access to Bing, Outlook, Teams. and do their test with all cookie disabled with a simple GPO (if accepted). It's why i tell it's a low priority feature because it's very specific, but if we do it, some other maybe to it too. But it can be useful to people who don't want to check cookie and authorise manually like you have explained me on the other post. some user want just to disable cookie autorise microsoft and don't modify anything else so for these too very specific user it can be a good feature.1.3KViews0likes1CommentRe: Exeption of microsoft
yes i know here i only ask a switch to manually activate it for thowe (like me on my work computer) who totally disable cookie to have a way to uncheck cookie but check "microsoft" cookie only. (like that an admin sys can forbid all cookie and let microsoft services work normally. without to manually add any exeption in the browser Edit of course it's a very low priority request but it will certainly be welcome in entreprise.1.4KViews0likes5CommentsRe: Encrypted SNI feature request
HotCakeX @Neil Haskett @Elliot Kirk Actually ESNI will never be implemented in chromium since there is a "new" version who try to stantardise ESNI by close collaboration, facilitated by the IETF, between academics and Cloudflare, Fastly, Mozilla. Is name is ECH (link is the anouncement by Cloudflare).7KViews1like3CommentsExeption of microsoft
Hello, I have feedbaked to ask a way in cookie configuration, to let us disable cookie (or third patie cookie) but add a third switch to easily whitelist Microsoft cookie. Because in my configuration i often have a problem with edge who block sso of microsoft. And i ask a switch to let choice to the user/admin sys. If you think it's a good idea. Like and feedback it too to ask the function to microsoft DEV1.5KViews0likes7CommentsRe: Slow release of extension updates
DavidGB yes i have reinstalled my laptop and forgot this feature (auto translate). in this case i think it must be the complexity of the extension who slow down the process, but do not forget, edge store is in beta state. And on the "old" edge update was taken by Microsoft store so, i think (maybe) they are for now understaffed and (since now it's chrome extension) not as fast as chrome and firefox who does that for years now. So i pretty sure it will be better with time so all we can do it's waiting. But you speak truth (even 3 day in my case is still pretty slow if we compare with other). HotCakeX It's more complex, my answer is more : i think some do not do update as fast a the dev (if it's a maintainer (like i maintain css exfil protection), if the dev update firefox and chrome, even if i see it immediately, and upload it 1 hour after him the 3 day will do that the update will arrive after chrome/firefox. And on the other and an extension like ublock is very complex so it must take some times to review each update since they don't have a bot like Google (since Google have updated the detection bot for year event if Microsoft have one it's news so not as useful).1.6KViews0likes0CommentsRe: Slow release of extension updates
Good evening, The problem does not come from microsoft or edge (I have myself an extension on the edge store and the validation usually takes 3 working days. The only time when the delay is longer (about a week) is during the first submission. I have two extensions and the delays are always the ones mentioned above (now the time can be increased depending on the complexity of the code). And since google scans the extensions by a bot, at microsoft it seems to me that it's totally manual (human).1.7KViews0likes3CommentsDeployement feature
Hello, I think microsoft have to implement a switch in confidentiality, ... To let (from stable to canary) a user decide he want to have last feature enabled asap. to bypass the controlled rollot feature. Because many people prefer to have this kind of thing. For instance two type of people (adventurous but who don't want tu use beta). Admin Sys (who want to try if these feature are buggy or not (to eventually prevent their activation with GPO)). For these two kinds of people they have to wait that you enable these feature in their country and it's very very annoying to not let us the choice. I already have reported it, if you have the same through as me, report it too (feedback) and tell here you want it 🙂523Views0likes0CommentsWill Microsoft Follow Apple on Private Click Measurement ?
Hello, I know chrome's blink is the fork of the webcore component of webkit so it's technically possible to follow with edge too (even if difficult to implemnt). I really hope to see Microsoft follow Apple on this Private Clic Measurement. Because if Microsoft and Apple do someting to help anonymous tracking only (while agressively blocking invasive tracking), it will be good for all. What's your thoughts on this ? Source : Private Tracking Measurements (cyber-reports)781Views0likes0Comments
Recent Blog Articles
No content to show