Home

Presence in Outlook when only using Teams

%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-217907%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EPresence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-217907%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHello.%26nbsp%3B%20Is%20there%20currently%20a%20way%20to%20integrate%20Microsoft%20Teams%20presence%20into%20Outlook%20similar%20to%20how%20Skype%20for%20Business%20would%3F%26nbsp%3B%20I've%20noticed%20that%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%2C%20Outlook%20does%20not%20show%20a%20users%20presence.%26nbsp%3B%20However%2C%20if%20i%20switch%20back%20to%20Skype%20for%20Business%20and%20relaunch%20Outlook%20then%20the%20presence%20is%20there.%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-center%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20195px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F38064i92B2FE53B3EEB80A%2Fimage-size%2Fmedium%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D400%22%20alt%3D%22Presence%20available%20when%20using%20SFB.jpg%22%20title%3D%22Presence%20available%20when%20using%20SFB.jpg%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-217907%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EMicrosoft%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EOutlook%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EPresence%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-356763%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-356763%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EAFAIK%20this%20feature%20is%20not%20completed%20yet!%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-334739%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-334739%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EThanks%20Chris!%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-334599%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-334599%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ETeams%20Only%20is%20required%20for%20Teams%20presence%20integration.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-334564%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-334564%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EAny%20updates%20here%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Do%20you%20have%20to%20be%20in%20Teams%20Only%20mode%20for%20this%20to%20work%3F%26nbsp%3B%20I%20have%20an%20on-prem%20SfB%20account%2C%20and%20when%20I%20set%20this%20check%20box%20to%20use%20Teams%20as%20the%20chat%20app%20I%20do%20not%20get%20presence%20in%20Outlook.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-327971%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-327971%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EThis%20is%20for%20windows%2C%20not%20sure%20the%20Mac%20client%20has%20been%20updated%20yet%20to%20use%20Teams%20presence.%20Can%20anyone%20else%20confirm%20I%20no%20longer%20have%20a%20mac%20to%20test%20%3A(.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-327804%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-327804%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHI%20All%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EOutlook%20presence%20issue%20can%20be%20resolved%20by%26nbsp%3B%3CSPAN%3Echecking%20box%20%22Register%20Teams%20as%20the%20chat%20app%20for%20Office%22%20from%20Teams%20client%20--%26gt%3B%20Settings%20--%26gt%3B%20General%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3EThanks%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-320120%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-320120%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3EWe're%20having%20the%20same%20issue%20with%20Outlook%20on%20Macs.%20Now%20that%20we've%20moved%20over%20from%20S4B%20to%20Teams%20(Teams%20Only)%2C%20the%20presence%20indicators%20are%20only%20showing%20up%20if%20you%20have%20the%20S4B%20client%20active.%20Is%20there%20a%20setting%20where%20I%20can%20change%20this%20to%20default%20to%20the%20Teams%20presence%3F%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-320118%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-320118%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWe're%20having%20the%20same%20issue%20with%20Outlook%20on%20Macs.%20Now%20that%20we've%20moved%20over%20from%20S4B%20to%20Teams%20(Teams%20Only)%2C%20the%20presence%20indicators%20are%20only%20showing%20up%20if%20you%20have%20the%20S4B%20client%20active.%20Is%20there%20a%20setting%20where%20I%20can%20change%20this%20to%20default%20to%20the%20Teams%20presence%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-286334%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-286334%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EFrom%20what%20I've%20seen%20this%20setting%20means%20that%20when%20I%20initiate%20a%20new%20chat%20from%20an%20Office%20application%20it%20will%20open%20in%20Teams%20rather%20than%20Skype.%20Hover%20a%20name%20with%20the%20presence%20indicator%20in%20Office%20and%20click%20the%20chat%20symbol%20in%20the%20small%20people%20card%20to%20verify.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-283686%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-283686%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ECan%20anyone%20confirm%2Fdeny%20that%20the%20Outlook%20presence%20will%20only%20work%20if%20the%20user%20is%20using%20Office%20ProPlus%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Will%20presence%20from%20Teams%20not%20work%20on%20the%20perpetual%20licensed%20version%20of%20Office%20(2016%20and%2For%202013)%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAlso%2C%20we%20did%20notice%20that%26nbsp%3Bwhen%20we%20changed%20the%20TeamsUpgradePolicy%20to%20UpgradeToTeams%20that%20it%20enabled%20this%20new%20setting%20in%20Teams%20by%20default%20which%20seems%20to%20control%20the%20presence%20in%20Outlook%2C%20but%20I'm%20not%20sure%20what%20else%20it%20does.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-left%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F59262i06BA6C0E85EA087F%2Fimage-size%2Fmedium%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D400%22%20alt%3D%22TeamsDefaultChatApp.png%22%20title%3D%22TeamsDefaultChatApp.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-281721%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-281721%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Steven%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EStill%20floating%20around%2C%20this%20is%20tonight's%20home%20on%20the%20latest%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fsailingdestinationanywhere%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Epost%20on%20FB%3C%2FA%3E.%20I%20got%20a%20little%20brain%20bored%20earlier%20in%20the%20year%20and%20reverted%20to%20my%20Change%20Management%2F365%20thinking%20from%20when%20I%20was%20at%20Msft.%20I%20am%20far%20from%20full%20time%20but%20have%20the%20opportunity%20to%20help%20some%20nice%20people%20out%2C%20and%20obviously%2C%20Teams%20migration%2Fdeployment%20if%20the%20flavour%20of%20the%20month%20given%20the%20enormous%20push%20from%20my%20old%20employer%20%3A)%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThanks%20for%20your%20thoughts%2C%20I'll%20have%20a%20chew%20on%20that.%20New%20ways%20of%20working%20are%26nbsp%3Bobviously%20enabled%20through%20the%20tool%2C%20and%20maybe%20not%20worrying%20about%20presence%26nbsp%3Bis%20a%20good%20thing.%20I%20guess%20the%20'old'%20way%20was%20to%20check%20presence%2C%20and%20if%20they%20were%20there%20to%20send%20a%20message%20expecting%20a%20response%2C%20and%20if%20they%20weren't%20there%20accept%20a%20delayed%20response.%20Now%20perhaps%2C%20the%20conversation%20is%20always%20asynchronous%2C%20like%20email%2C%20but%20with%20the%20difference%20that%20the%201%3A1%2C%20or%20group%2Fchannel%20chats%20are%20always%20persistent.%20Interesting%26nbsp%3Bthought.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20will%20be%20back%20in%20the%20UK%2C%20and%20in%20London%20the%20first%20week%20of%20December%20I%20think%20so%20perhaps%20nearer%20the%20time%20I'll%20ping%20you%20and%20see%20if%20you%20have%20time%20for%20a%20coffee.%20Seems%20an%20awfully%20long%20time%20since%20we%20last%20met%20with%20Mr.%20H.%20%3A)%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-281617%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-281617%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Malc%2C%20back%20on%20solid%20land%3F%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EI%20would%20suggest%20that%20Teams%20makes%20some%20of%20the%20ways%20of%20working%20from%20Skype%20less%20important.%20Knowing%20that%20someone%20is%20available%20is%20really%20less%20important%20when%20messages%20are%20persistent.%20Their%20presence%20is%20there%20and%20shown%2C%20but%20it's%20not%20really%20necessary%20to%20check%20someone%20is%20available%20before%20starting%20a%20conversation.%20You%20shouldn't%20need%20to%20have%20a%20view%20to%20see%20who%20is%20online.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EYou%20should%20have%20contact%20groups%2C%20but%20I%20think%20you%20can%20only%20create%20them%20from%20the%20desktop%2Fbrowser%20client.%20In%20the%20chat%20section%20you%20get%20kind%20of%20tabs%20between%20previous%20chats%20and%20contacts.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EGroup%20chats%20exist%2C%20but%20again%20aren't%20really%20like%20they%20were%20in%20Skype%20throughout%20Teams%20where%20it%20was%20a%20kind%20of%20DL%20type%20experience.%20Create%20a%20team%2C%20that's%20what%20the%20product%20is%20for.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-281534%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-281534%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Steven%20(%26amp%3B%20all)%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAny%20ideas%20about%20the%20mobile%20apps%3F%20My%20preferred%20client%20is%20an%20IPad%20Pro%20and%20the%20IOS%20app%20is%20severely%20lacking%20in%20the%20basic%20functionality%20of%20presence%2C%20groups%2C%20contact%20lists%20etc.%20In%20%E2%80%98Teams%20Only%E2%80%99%20mode%20it%E2%80%99s%20quite%20a%20frustrating%20experience%20when%20compared%20to%20Skype%20for%20Business.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ERegards%2C%20Malc%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-281371%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-281371%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EMan%2C%20I%20just%20noticed%20this%20today%20and%20was%20going%20to%20spread%20the%20good%20news.%20On%20a%20new%20account%20so%20I%20never%20got%20the%20e-mail%20of%20the%20reply%20that%20you%20guys%20updated%20this%20post%20with%20the%20information%20%3A).%20Good%20to%20see%20this%20in%20now!%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-280905%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-280905%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThanks%20for%20that%2C%20Teams%20is%20really%20getting%20there%20now%20and%20our%20users%20are%20grateful%20for%20it!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-280294%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-280294%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EYes%2C%20it%20should%20have%20just%20about%20completed%20rollout%20now.%20There's%20a%20check%20box%20in%20Teams%20settings%20to%20make%20it%20the%20default%20chat%20app%20in%20Office.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-280235%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-280235%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EAfter%20updating%20to%20Office%201810%20today%20I've%20noticed%20that%20presence%20comes%20through%20and%20I%20can%20also%20click%20on%20numbers%20and%20IM%20icons%20to%20initiate%20conversations%20in%20Teams.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20287px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F58729i3B33C50030A66365%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20alt%3D%22TeamsPresence.PNG%22%20title%3D%22TeamsPresence.PNG%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAnyone%20else%20seeing%20this%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-275818%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-275818%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20agree%2C%20Jonas%20-%20I%20will%20push%20to%20have%20that%20done%20ASAP.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20think%20you'll%20be%20pleased.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-275593%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-275593%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EA%20uservoice%20is%20great.%20Would%20be%20nice%20if%20an%20admin%20in%20Uservoice%20could%20at%20least%20comment%20on%20the%20item%20saying%20%22it's%20on%20the%20roadmap%22%20or%20%22investigating%22%20or%20if%20it%20simply%20is%20so%20long%20down%20the%20priority%20list%20that%20we%20might%20not%20see%20if%20for%20years%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-268888%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-268888%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EPlease%20add%20your%20vote%20to%20the%20User%20Voice%20item.%26nbsp%3B%20We%20regularly%20update%20the%20items%20and%20will%20notify%20once%20this%20is%20available.%26nbsp%3B%20Thank%20you!%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fmicrosoftteams.uservoice.com%2Fforums%2F555103-public%2Fsuggestions%2F34132810-integrate-presence-in-outlook-contacts-from-teams%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fmicrosoftteams.uservoice.com%2Fforums%2F555103-public%2Fsuggestions%2F34132810-integrate-presence-in-outlook-contacts-from-teams%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-268886%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-268886%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThere%20are%20many%20Skype%20to%20Teams%20migration%20resources%20here%3A%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fskypeandteams.fasttrack.microsoft.com%2F%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fskypeandteams.fasttrack.microsoft.com%2F%3C%2FA%3E%20-%20I%20urge%20you%20to%20let%20us%20know%20what%20might%20be%20useful%20in%20addition%20to%20what%20you%20find%20there%20to%20support%20your%20upgrade.%26nbsp%3B%20Thank%20you!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-268870%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-268870%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F178440%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Steven%20Collier%3C%2FA%3EGreat%20to%20see%20when%20this%20becomes%20available%2C%20any%20ideas%20on%20timeframes.%20For%20our%20users%20who%20have%20migrated%20to%20Teams%20it%20is%20a%20much%20missed%20feature%20along%20with%20being%20able%20to%20call%20or%20IM%20people%20with%20a%20few%20mouse%20clicks.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-265204%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-265204%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F5941%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Joe%20Stocker%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bis%20correct%2C%20the%20integration%20between%20Teams%20and%20Outlook%20is%20a%20separate%20deliverable%20that%20hasn't%20been%20made%20generally%20available%20yet.%20It's%20not%20far%20away%20now.%20Unified%20Presence%20means%20that%20Skype%20and%20Teams%20show%20the%20correct%20presence%20depending%20on%20the%20interop%20modes.%20These%20things%20end%20up%20being%20quite%20complicated.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-265033%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-265033%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EWhen%20Microsoft%20uses%20the%20term%20%22Unified%20Presence%22%20they%20are%20talking%20about%20between%20Skype%20and%20Teams.%20I%20am%20going%20to%20coin%20a%20term%20%22Super%20Unified%20Presence%22%20to%20refer%20to%20Skype%2C%20Teams%2C%20*and*%20the%20Outlook%20client.%20%3D)%3C%2Fimg%3E%20As%20of%2010%2F1%2F2018%20in%20my%20tenant%2C%20Super%20Unified%20Presence%20is%20not%20available%20yet.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-264993%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-264993%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI%20tested%20it%20today%20in%20%22Teams%20Only%22%20mode.%20Presence%20still%20doesn't%20work%20in%20Outlook.%20It%20works%20great%20between%20Teams%20and%20Skype.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-264990%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-264990%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20heard%20%22Unified%20presence%22%20while%20at%20Ignite%20several%20times%20last%20week%2C%20but%20they%20didn't%20go%20into%20great%20detail%20about%20how%20it%20works.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20even%20went%20to%20an%20architecture%20session%20and%20all%20they%20said%20is%20Teams%20has%20unified%20presence%20and%20that's%20it.%26nbsp%3B%20No%20mention%20of%20controlling%20presence%20in%20Outlook.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-264908%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-264908%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThis%20says%20that%20it's%20%22Available%20today%22...am%20i%20reading%20it%20correctly%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fskypeandteams.blob.core.windows.net%2Fartefacts%2FSkype%2520for%2520Business%2520to%2520Teams%2520Capabilities%2520Roadmap.pdf%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fskypeandteams.blob.core.windows.net%2Fartefacts%2FSkype%2520for%2520Business%2520to%2520Teams%2520Capabilities%2520Roadmap.pdf%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20915px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F55158iF32867521F0593C5%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20alt%3D%22Snag_a15535.png%22%20title%3D%22Snag_a15535.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-261709%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-261709%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EIt%20is%20coming%2C%20I%20don%3Bt%20think%20it's%20very%20far%20away%20from%20release%20but%20I%20think%20will%20rely%20on%20you%20being%20in%20Teams%20only%20mode.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-261598%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-261598%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI'm%20now%20having%20the%20same%20issue.%20Initially%20it%20was%20working%20and%20now%20the%20presence%20in%20Outlook%20is%20not%20showing.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-261391%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-261391%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3Ein%20our%20case%2C%20having%20the%20old%20skype%20client%20running%20did%20not%20bring%20presence%20back%20into%20outlook.%20restarting%20outlook%20did%20not%20help%20either.%20Tried%20all%20combinations%2C%20restarting%20Skype%20while%20Outlook%20is%20open%2C%20restarting%20Outlook%20while%20Skype%20is%20open%2C%20etc%2C%20etc.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F54273i58B63258392204F1%2Fimage-size%2Fmedium%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D400%22%20alt%3D%22Teams%20Presence.png%22%20title%3D%22Teams%20Presence.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-260703%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-260703%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EWell%20I%20guess%20there%20is%20always%20that%20%3Aface_with_tears_of_joy%3A%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-260695%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-260695%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ESo%20for%20everyone%20that%20is%20interested.%26nbsp%3B%20After%20you%20switch%20to%20Teams%20Only%20mode%2C%20you%20can%20still%20have%20Skype%20running%20to%20handle%20presence%20in%20Outlook.%26nbsp%3B%20It%20just%20minimizes%20and%20gives%20you%20a%20message%20to%20use%20Teams.%20%3A)%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20251px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F54093i737832F219A43E1C%2Fimage-size%2Fmedium%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D400%22%20alt%3D%22teamsonly.JPG%22%20title%3D%22teamsonly.JPG%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-260693%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-260693%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI'll%20be%20at%20Ignite%20too.%20Looking%20forward%20to%20it!%20%3A)%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-260691%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-260691%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ENo%20they%20haven%E2%80%99t%20said.%20I%20think%20they%20forgot%20about%20it.%20But%20I%E2%80%99ll%20ping%20around%20at%20ignite%20if%20I%20don%E2%80%99t%20see%20anything%20in%20the%20early%20sessions%20and%20see%20if%20I%20can%E2%80%99t%20find%20out.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-260688%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-260688%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThanks%2C%20Christopher.%26nbsp%3B%20Is%20there%20a%20date%20when%20Presence%20functionality%20between%20Teams%20and%20Outlook%20will%20be%20delivered%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-260687%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-260687%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ETeams%20screenshare%20without%20a%20call%20is%20coming%20but%20your%20right%20you%20can%E2%80%99t%20do%20yet.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EThere%20is%20no%20federation%20of%20teams%20you%20can%20invite%20other%20tenants%20users%20via%20guest.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EPer%20previous%20message%20no%20outlook%20integration%20for%20teams%20presence.%20Teams%20only%20mode%20will%20not%20work.%20Only%20islands%20when%20using%20s4b%20client%20will%20work%20with%20outlook%20and%20presence%20and%20possibly%20one%20of%20the%20future%20coexistence%20settings%20but%20it%20still%20requires%20the%20s4b%20client%20to%20be%20running%20currently%20to%20have%20outlook%20presence%20work.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-260686%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-260686%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EPresence%20in%20outlook%20is%20not%20yet%20a%20feature%20yet%20so%20it%E2%80%99s%20not%20going%20to%20work%20regardless%20of%20the%20mode%20your%20in%20unless%20your%20using%20Skype%20for%20business%20client%20which%20had%20the%20add%20in%20that%20talks%20to%20outlook%20presence.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-260685%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-260685%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI%20confirmed%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20is%20still%20not%20working%20when%20in%20Coexistence%2FTeams%20only%20mode.%20Maybe%20it%20will%20take%20a%20bit%20to%20provision%20on%20the%20backend%20since%20I%20made%20the%20change%2010%20minutes%20ago.%20I%20will%20check%20later.%20This%20functionality%20is%20critical%20to%20moving%20from%20SfB%20to%20Teams.%20The%20presence%20in%20Outlook%20relied%20upon%20in%20Business%20environments.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-260684%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-260684%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThat%20article%20covers%20everything%20you%20need%20from%20a%20guidance%20perspective.%26nbsp%3B%20It%20would%20be%20great%20to%20have%20a%20walkthrough%20document%20on%20how%20to%20migrate%20from%20SfB%20to%20Teams.%26nbsp%3B%20My%20tenant%20is%20set%20to%20Islands%20through%20the%20web%20interface.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20will%20test%20out%20the%20PowerShell%20cmdlet%20by%20switching%20my%20account's%20upgrade%20policy%20mode%20to%20Team's%20Only%20and%20see%20if%20I%20can%20just%20use%20Teams%20without%20having%20Skype%20running.%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CUL%3E%3CLI%3EI%20noticed%20with%20Teams%20is%20that%20it's%20not%20straightforward%26nbsp%3Bto%20just%20do%20a%20screen%20share%26nbsp%3Bwithout%20a%20call.%3C%2FLI%3E%3CLI%3EIf%20you're%20federated%20with%20another%20Tenant%2C%20does%20that%20allow%20the%20federated%20tenant%20users%20to%20join%20Teams%20within%20both%20tenants%3F%3C%2FLI%3E%3CLI%3EWill%20presence%20in%20Outlook%20get%20controlled%20by%20Teams%20once%20I%20switch%20to%20Teams%20Only%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Is%20this%20the%20only%20mode%20that%20will%20allow%20Teams%20to%20control%20presence%20info%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FLI%3E%3C%2FUL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-218483%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-218483%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20have%20the%20Contacts%20tab%20in%20Chats%20yes.%20I%20am%20on%20a%20Mac%26nbsp%3Bso%20I%20don't%20know%20if%20my%20experience%20would%20reflect%20what%20others%20get.%20I%20currently%20run%20both%20Teams%20(20%25%20of%20chats)%20and%20Skype%20(80%25%20of%20chats).%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-218462%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-218462%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EHave%20the%20presence%20updates%20been%20pushed%20to%20your%20tenant%20yet%3F%20You%20can%20usually%20tell%20by%20the%20chat%20tab%2C%20if%20you%20have%20the%20tabs%20for%20Recent%20and%20Contacts%20at%20the%20top%2C%20vs.%20just%20saying%20favorites.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-218381%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-218381%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20am%20not%20positive%20if%20they%20will%20eventually%20show%20all%20of%20the%20available%20modes%20in%20the%20Teams%20Upgrade%20section%20for%20coexistence%20mode%20or%20not%2C%20but%20you%26nbsp%3Bshould%20have%20them%20available%20to%20you%20through%20Powershell.%26nbsp%3B%20This%20article%20should%20help%20you%20with%20setting%20different%20modes%20for%20the%20entire%20tenant%20or%20individual%20users%3A%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fmicrosoftteams%2Fmigration-interop-guidance-for-teams-with-skype%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fmicrosoftteams%2Fmigration-interop-guidance-for-teams-with-skype%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-218373%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-218373%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EMaybe%20the%20options%20are%20changing%2C%20but%20I%20can't%20select%20Teams%20Only.%20(the%20screen%20shot%20is%20the%20Organization%20Wide%2C%20but%20for%20individual%20users%20there%20is%20no%20option%20either).%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22blob%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2F1382760b-32c3-4942-b8ea-aa19d5c47114%22%20border%3D%220%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-218203%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-218203%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EThanks%2C%20I%20had%20not%20explored%20those%20interop%20modes%2C%20just%20what%20we%20needed!%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-218111%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-218111%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F3786%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Rob%20O'Keefe%3C%2FA%3E%20this%20interop%20will%20depend%20on%20the%20mode%20your%20user%20account%20is%20set%20for%20in%20Teams%20admin%20portal.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EIn%20Islands%20mode%2C%20teams%20messages%20go%20to%20teams%20and%20skype%20messages%20go%20to%20skype%2C%20no%20interop.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3BIf%20you%20can%20set%20your%20self%20to%20Teams%20Only%20then%20skype%20and%20teams%20messages%20will%20come%20to%20you%20in%20Teams.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EThere%20are%20some%20limitations%2C%20interop%20won't%20support%20all%20scenarios%20for%20example%20multiparty%20federated%20chats%2C%20but%20it's%20largely%20enough.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-218064%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-218064%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EIt%20would%20be%20good%20to%20understand%20when%20MSFT%20recommends%20moving%20off%20of%20Skype%20to%20full-time%20Teams.%20We%20don't%20use%20and%20telephony%20and%20limited%20video%2C%20mostly%201-1%20chat%20in%20skype%20(instant%26nbsp%3Bmessaging).%20If%20someone%20skype%20messages%20me%20and%20I%20only%20have%20Teams%20running%2C%20I%20do%20not%20get%20the%20message.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIt%20seems%20skype%20messaging%20interoperability%20and%20presence%20interoperability%26nbsp%3Bare%20the%20two%26nbsp%3Bhold%20ups%20of%26nbsp%3Bcompanies%20moving%20off%20Skype%20and%20onto%20Teams.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-217977%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-217977%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EThis%20isn't%20exactly%20the%20same%20thing%20%3Ap.%20I%20don't%20know%20if%20the%20presence%20updates%20are%20100%25%20rolled%20out%2C%20they%20should%20be%2C%20but%20you%20can%20check%20if%20you%20have%20contact%20groups%20in%20your%20chat%20tab.%20If%20you%20do%20then%20this%20should%20work.%20What%20are%20your%20calendar%20entries%3F%20They%20have%20to%20be%20marked%20as%20busy%20to%20be%20reflected%20in%20your%20status%2C%20and%20you%20had%20to%20have%20had%20them%20created%2C%20you%20can't%20just%20add%20them%20now%20and%20expect%20it%20to%20change%2C%20it%20runs%20in%20like%20a%20timer%20job%20to%20check%20them%20so%20it%20has%20to%20be%20there%20when%20that%20check%20occurs%20for%20updates%20to%20happen%20to%20presence.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-217973%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-217973%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EThey%20haven't%20added%20the%20presence%20integration%20yet%20to%20Outlook%20for%20Teams.%20Not%20sure%20if%20it's%20being%20worked%20on%20or%20not.%20Going%20to%20ask%20on%20the%20Teams%20AMA%20coming%20up%20in%20the%20near%20future%20%3A).%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-217958%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-217958%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EPresence%20in%20Office%20is%20in%20the%20plans%2C%20but%20not%20quite%20ready%20yet.%20I%20would%20suggest%20giving%20it%20a%20couple%20of%20months.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-217938%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-217938%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20have%20the%20similar%20problem%20and%20vice%20versa%3A%20My%20Teams%20doesn't%20sync%20with%20my%20Outlook%20calendar.%20Even%20I'm%20reserved%20in%20my%20calendar%2C%20Teams%20shows%20that%20I'm%20available.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-422799%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-422799%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThanks%2C%20Adam%20-%20I%20was%20hoping%20that%20by%20the%20end%20of%20the%20entire%20thread%20we'd%20have%20some%20progress%2C%20but%20I'll%20have%20to%20wait%20a%20little%20longer%20for%20Teams%20on%20macOS%20integration.%20Will%20you%20help%20to%20let%20us%20know%20when%20it's%20ready%3F%20Thanks%20in%20advance...%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-562594%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-562594%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EFinally%2C%20the%20solution%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fblogs.technet.microsoft.com%2Ftip_of_the_day%2F2019%2F03%2F04%2Ftip-of-the-day-teams-status-in-outlook%2F%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fblogs.technet.microsoft.com%2Ftip_of_the_day%2F2019%2F03%2F04%2Ftip-of-the-day-teams-status-in-outlook%2F%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-781414%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-781414%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThat's%20still%20just%20a%20Windows%20only%20solution%2C%20no%20such%20settings%20in%20the%20MacOS%20teams%20Client.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESkype%20For%20Business%20is%20still%20required.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-783919%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-783919%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F158352%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Bryan%20Revelle%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BI%20finally%20found%20the%20solution%20to%20this-%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3COL%3E%3CLI%3EOpen%20Teams%3C%2FLI%3E%3CLI%3EAccess%20Settings%20through%20your%20profile%20button%20in%20the%20top%20right%3A%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F125282iCF08FE4BBB3D14F2%2Fimage-size%2Fmedium%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D400%22%20alt%3D%22clipboard_image_0.png%22%20title%3D%22clipboard_image_0.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FLI%3E%3CLI%3E%3CSPAN%3EUnder%20the%20General%20tab%2C%20locate%20and%20select%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3CSTRONG%3ERegister%20Teams%20as%20the%20chat%20app%20for%20Office%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%3C%2FLI%3E%3CLI%3ERestart%20Outlook%3C%2FLI%3E%3C%2FOL%3E%3CP%3ENow%20your%20teams%20status%20will%20be%20in%20sync%20with%20Outlook.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-838802%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-838802%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F158352%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Bryan%20Revelle%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BEnsure%20that%20Office%20and%20Teams%20are%20both%20on%20either%2032%20or%2064%20bit.%20If%20they%20are%20on%20different%20versions%2C%20the%20presence%20will%20not%20work.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThis%20worked%20for%20us.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1004161%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1004161%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F385751%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40lokesh142%3C%2FA%3Eis%20there%20a%20way%20to%20do%20this%20Organization%20wide%20instead%20of%20client%20by%20client%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-356760%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Presence%20in%20Outlook%20when%20only%20using%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-356760%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20all%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20managed%20to%20set%20the%20presence%20on%20outlook%20and%20its%20great!%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI'm%20checking%20out%20here%20if%20its%20possible%20to%20do%20so%20also%20on%20MAC%20devices%20as%20I%20can't%20find%20the%20option%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThanks!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Bryan Revelle
Occasional Contributor

Hello.  Is there currently a way to integrate Microsoft Teams presence into Outlook similar to how Skype for Business would?  I've noticed that when only using Teams, Outlook does not show a users presence.  However, if i switch back to Skype for Business and relaunch Outlook then the presence is there.Presence available when using SFB.jpg

57 Replies

I have the similar problem and vice versa: My Teams doesn't sync with my Outlook calendar. Even I'm reserved in my calendar, Teams shows that I'm available.

Presence in Office is in the plans, but not quite ready yet. I would suggest giving it a couple of months.

 

They haven't added the presence integration yet to Outlook for Teams. Not sure if it's being worked on or not. Going to ask on the Teams AMA coming up in the near future :).
This isn't exactly the same thing :p. I don't know if the presence updates are 100% rolled out, they should be, but you can check if you have contact groups in your chat tab. If you do then this should work. What are your calendar entries? They have to be marked as busy to be reflected in your status, and you had to have had them created, you can't just add them now and expect it to change, it runs in like a timer job to check them so it has to be there when that check occurs for updates to happen to presence.

It would be good to understand when MSFT recommends moving off of Skype to full-time Teams. We don't use and telephony and limited video, mostly 1-1 chat in skype (instant messaging). If someone skype messages me and I only have Teams running, I do not get the message. 

 

It seems skype messaging interoperability and presence interoperability are the two hold ups of companies moving off Skype and onto Teams.

@Rob O'Keefe this interop will depend on the mode your user account is set for in Teams admin portal.

 

In Islands mode, teams messages go to teams and skype messages go to skype, no interop.

 If you can set your self to Teams Only then skype and teams messages will come to you in Teams.

 

There are some limitations, interop won't support all scenarios for example multiparty federated chats, but it's largely enough.

Thanks, I had not explored those interop modes, just what we needed!

Maybe the options are changing, but I can't select Teams Only. (the screen shot is the Organization Wide, but for individual users there is no option either). 

 

I am not positive if they will eventually show all of the available modes in the Teams Upgrade section for coexistence mode or not, but you should have them available to you through Powershell.  This article should help you with setting different modes for the entire tenant or individual users:  https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/migration-interop-guidance-for-teams-with-skype

Have the presence updates been pushed to your tenant yet? You can usually tell by the chat tab, if you have the tabs for Recent and Contacts at the top, vs. just saying favorites.

I have the Contacts tab in Chats yes. I am on a Mac so I don't know if my experience would reflect what others get. I currently run both Teams (20% of chats) and Skype (80% of chats).

That article covers everything you need from a guidance perspective.  It would be great to have a walkthrough document on how to migrate from SfB to Teams.  My tenant is set to Islands through the web interface.  I will test out the PowerShell cmdlet by switching my account's upgrade policy mode to Team's Only and see if I can just use Teams without having Skype running.  

 

  • I noticed with Teams is that it's not straightforward to just do a screen share without a call.
  • If you're federated with another Tenant, does that allow the federated tenant users to join Teams within both tenants?
  • Will presence in Outlook get controlled by Teams once I switch to Teams Only?  Is this the only mode that will allow Teams to control presence info? 
I confirmed Presence in Outlook is still not working when in Coexistence/Teams only mode. Maybe it will take a bit to provision on the backend since I made the change 10 minutes ago. I will check later. This functionality is critical to moving from SfB to Teams. The presence in Outlook relied upon in Business environments.
Presence in outlook is not yet a feature yet so it’s not going to work regardless of the mode your in unless your using Skype for business client which had the add in that talks to outlook presence.
Teams screenshare without a call is coming but your right you can’t do yet.

There is no federation of teams you can invite other tenants users via guest.

Per previous message no outlook integration for teams presence. Teams only mode will not work. Only islands when using s4b client will work with outlook and presence and possibly one of the future coexistence settings but it still requires the s4b client to be running currently to have outlook presence work.

Thanks, Christopher.  Is there a date when Presence functionality between Teams and Outlook will be delivered?

No they haven’t said. I think they forgot about it. But I’ll ping around at ignite if I don’t see anything in the early sessions and see if I can’t find out.
I'll be at Ignite too. Looking forward to it! :)

So for everyone that is interested.  After you switch to Teams Only mode, you can still have Skype running to handle presence in Outlook.  It just minimizes and gives you a message to use Teams. :)

 

teamsonly.JPG

Well I guess there is always that :face_with_tears_of_joy:

in our case, having the old skype client running did not bring presence back into outlook. restarting outlook did not help either. Tried all combinations, restarting Skype while Outlook is open, restarting Outlook while Skype is open, etc, etc.

Teams Presence.png

I'm now having the same issue. Initially it was working and now the presence in Outlook is not showing.

It is coming, I don;t think it's very far away from release but I think will rely on you being in Teams only mode.

I heard "Unified presence" while at Ignite several times last week, but they didn't go into great detail about how it works.  I even went to an architecture session and all they said is Teams has unified presence and that's it.  No mention of controlling presence in Outlook.

I tested it today in "Teams Only" mode. Presence still doesn't work in Outlook. It works great between Teams and Skype.
When Microsoft uses the term "Unified Presence" they are talking about between Skype and Teams. I am going to coin a term "Super Unified Presence" to refer to Skype, Teams, *and* the Outlook client. =) As of 10/1/2018 in my tenant, Super Unified Presence is not available yet.

@Joe Stocker is correct, the integration between Teams and Outlook is a separate deliverable that hasn't been made generally available yet. It's not far away now. Unified Presence means that Skype and Teams show the correct presence depending on the interop modes. These things end up being quite complicated.

 

@Steven CollierGreat to see when this becomes available, any ideas on timeframes. For our users who have migrated to Teams it is a much missed feature along with being able to call or IM people with a few mouse clicks.

There are many Skype to Teams migration resources here: https://skypeandteams.fasttrack.microsoft.com/ - I urge you to let us know what might be useful in addition to what you find there to support your upgrade.  Thank you!

Please add your vote to the User Voice item.  We regularly update the items and will notify once this is available.  Thank you! 

 

https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/34132810-integrate-presence-in...

A uservoice is great. Would be nice if an admin in Uservoice could at least comment on the item saying "it's on the roadmap" or "investigating" or if it simply is so long down the priority list that we might not see if for years?

I agree, Jonas - I will push to have that done ASAP.  I think you'll be pleased.

After updating to Office 1810 today I've noticed that presence comes through and I can also click on numbers and IM icons to initiate conversations in Teams.

 

TeamsPresence.PNG 

 

Anyone else seeing this?

Yes, it should have just about completed rollout now. There's a check box in Teams settings to make it the default chat app in Office.

Thanks for that, Teams is really getting there now and our users are grateful for it!

Man, I just noticed this today and was going to spread the good news. On a new account so I never got the e-mail of the reply that you guys updated this post with the information :). Good to see this in now!

Hi Steven (& all),

Any ideas about the mobile apps? My preferred client is an IPad Pro and the IOS app is severely lacking in the basic functionality of presence, groups, contact lists etc. In ‘Teams Only’ mode it’s quite a frustrating experience when compared to Skype for Business. 

 

Regards, Malc

Hi Malc, back on solid land?

 

I would suggest that Teams makes some of the ways of working from Skype less important. Knowing that someone is available is really less important when messages are persistent. Their presence is there and shown, but it's not really necessary to check someone is available before starting a conversation. You shouldn't need to have a view to see who is online.

 

You should have contact groups, but I think you can only create them from the desktop/browser client. In the chat section you get kind of tabs between previous chats and contacts.

 

Group chats exist, but again aren't really like they were in Skype throughout Teams where it was a kind of DL type experience. Create a team, that's what the product is for.

 

 

Hi Steven,

Still floating around, this is tonight's home on the latest post on FB. I got a little brain bored earlier in the year and reverted to my Change Management/365 thinking from when I was at Msft. I am far from full time but have the opportunity to help some nice people out, and obviously, Teams migration/deployment if the flavour of the month given the enormous push from my old employer :)

 

Thanks for your thoughts, I'll have a chew on that. New ways of working are obviously enabled through the tool, and maybe not worrying about presence is a good thing. I guess the 'old' way was to check presence, and if they were there to send a message expecting a response, and if they weren't there accept a delayed response. Now perhaps, the conversation is always asynchronous, like email, but with the difference that the 1:1, or group/channel chats are always persistent. Interesting thought.

 

I will be back in the UK, and in London the first week of December I think so perhaps nearer the time I'll ping you and see if you have time for a coffee. Seems an awfully long time since we last met with Mr. H. :)

 

Can anyone confirm/deny that the Outlook presence will only work if the user is using Office ProPlus?  Will presence from Teams not work on the perpetual licensed version of Office (2016 and/or 2013)?

 

Also, we did notice that when we changed the TeamsUpgradePolicy to UpgradeToTeams that it enabled this new setting in Teams by default which seems to control the presence in Outlook, but I'm not sure what else it does.

TeamsDefaultChatApp.png

 

 

From what I've seen this setting means that when I initiate a new chat from an Office application it will open in Teams rather than Skype. Hover a name with the presence indicator in Office and click the chat symbol in the small people card to verify.

We're having the same issue with Outlook on Macs. Now that we've moved over from S4B to Teams (Teams Only), the presence indicators are only showing up if you have the S4B client active. Is there a setting where I can change this to default to the Teams presence?

We're having the same issue with Outlook on Macs. Now that we've moved over from S4B to Teams (Teams Only), the presence indicators are only showing up if you have the S4B client active. Is there a setting where I can change this to default to the Teams presence?

HI All

 

Outlook presence issue can be resolved by checking box "Register Teams as the chat app for Office" from Teams client --> Settings --> General

 

Thanks

This is for windows, not sure the Mac client has been updated yet to use Teams presence. Can anyone else confirm I no longer have a mac to test :(.

Any updates here?  Do you have to be in Teams Only mode for this to work?  I have an on-prem SfB account, and when I set this check box to use Teams as the chat app I do not get presence in Outlook.

Teams Only is required for Teams presence integration.
Thanks Chris!
Related Conversations
Extentions Synchronization
Deleted in Discussions on
3 Replies
Tabs and Dark Mode
cjc2112 in Discussions on
38 Replies
flashing a white screen while open new tab
Deleted in Discussions on
14 Replies
Stable version of Edge insider browser
HotCakeX in Discussions on
35 Replies
Security Community Webinars
Valon_Kolica in Security, Privacy & Compliance on
13 Replies